President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

Should the US not be trying to get more favorable deals as well?

I get that Trump is a choad and his approach is brash and haphazard at best, but who has given any other route that doesn't include us using the confiscated Diddy lube?
Of course!

But you are missing the point of my sarcasm. Donald Trump is verbally attacking the Canadian government for doing the same thing that he is doing ..... looking out for their own financial best interests, at the potential expense of a trade-partner relationship with a long-standing ally.
 
Of course!

But you are missing the point of my sarcasm. Donald Trump is verbally attacking the Canadian government for doing the same thing that he is doing ..... looking out for their own financial best interests, at the potential expense of a trade-partner relationship with a long-standing ally.
Is that all there is to it?
 
The same way we will survive the tragic loss of the White House Calligrapher’s office.

At least, that is what I keep telling myself.
.... and a $300 million dollar White House ballroom can be demolished just as easily as a White House Calligrapher's office can. That just takes a change in power. Something to remember, for those donating all of this money.
 
.... and a $300 million dollar White House ballroom can be demolished just as easily as a White House Calligrapher's office can. That just takes a change in power. Something to remember, for those donating all of this money.

I think they're all aware at this point that Trump will have to be King for the next 100 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
.... and a $300 million dollar White House ballroom can be demolished just as easily as a White House Calligrapher's office can. That just takes a change in power. Something to remember, while all of this is being done.
But how will I ever survive?

Seriously, who gives a rat’s ass about these blowhards and their pomp and circumstance.

It does nothing, either way, to make my life better or worse, it just strokes their egos.

I could not care less; except for the joyous posting distraction it provides in an otherwise unremarkable day.
 
.... and a $300 million dollar White House ballroom can be demolished just as easily as a White House Calligrapher's office can. That just takes a change in power. Something to remember, for those donating all of this money.
Yea….all the previous presidents preferred a tent in the yard.

All presidents have wanted it, Trump is the only one who is taking the effort and spending the money to do it.
 
Such as who? That is so stupid. LOL!!!!

AI Overview

Yes, many previous presidents have wanted a ballroom; Trump stated that presidents have wanted one for over 150 years to accommodate large events like state dinners, and other administrations worked around the lack of a proper ballroom by using tents or dividing guests into separate rooms. Former First Lady Anita McBride confirmed that previous administrations were hindered by the size of existing rooms for events and felt a dedicated ballroom was long overdue.

 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
Spending taxpayer money on a ballroom is a dumb ****ing thing to celebrate
It's privately funded .... but to say that "all presidents" have wanted an ostentatious White House ballroom is ridiculous. @Buddy’s Bandit is a devoted Trump cult of personality member. He will unconditionally defend Trump for anything.
 
AI Overview

Yes, many previous presidents have wanted a ballroom; Trump stated that presidents have wanted one for over 150 years to accommodate large events like state dinners, and other administrations worked around the lack of a proper ballroom by using tents or dividing guests into separate rooms. Former First Lady Anita McBride confirmed that previous administrations were hindered by the size of existing rooms for events and felt a dedicated ballroom was long overdue.


That does not prove that any former Presidents have wanted such a thing.
 
It's retarded to think it could be done in one bite. And I know you aren't an idiot despite your left leanings. So what pray tell would be an acceptable number to be able to celebrate? Less is better, but in your eyes, less isn't good enough. So please spell it out so I will know when to cheer.

I discussed it with @CobbVol yesterday but I wanted to see a continuation of what we saw in June.....

That month broke a historic trend but we've largely reverted back to same historic trendline since then because of OBBBA....
 
It's retarded to think it could be done in one bite. And I know you aren't an idiot despite your left leanings. So what pray tell would be an acceptable number to be able to celebrate? Less is better, but in your eyes, less isn't good enough. So please spell it out so I will know when to cheer.

Legitimate question - What is left leaning by wanting a tiny, efficient federal government with limited govt regulation and interference?
 
The White House stated in July 2025 that the idea of a large ballroom has been desired for "at least 150 years," suggesting a long-standing interest across many administrations, though Trump is the one actively building it now.
 
I guess we are just supposed to believe that everything Trump says is the truth .... because Trump's cult of personality members such as yourself believe everything he says?
No guessing…The White House stated in July 2025 that the idea of a large ballroom has been desired for "at least 150 years," suggesting a long-standing interest across many administrations, though Trump is the one actively building it now.
 
The White House stated in July 2025 that the idea of a large ballroom has been desired for "at least 150 years," suggesting a long-standing interest across many administrations, though Trump is the one actively building it now.
In other words, Trump's White House said it .... so that makes it true? LOL!!!!!

Do you know how stupid that is?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top