That’s beside the point. My understanding is that many schools are treating 5% to women’s basketball as a “best practice” (quasi industry standard), presumably for Title IX purposes and because there is some “safety in numbers” element to adopting the 75/10/5/5 split. (In theory, Title IX could be interpreted much more onerously.)
FYI - if Title IX becomes an issue it will either:
1. Blow the whole system to bits because the work of football players (and to a much lesser extent men's basketball players) carries/funds all athletic departments and most athletic departments don't turn any profit whatsoever; or
2. The accountants will "do the math" and determine (a) how much revenue is generated by each sport for tickets, merchandise, tv contracts, cokes and popcorn; (b) the expenses of each sport (and I mean every line item); (c) that no sport other than perhaps football and men's basketball actually turn a profit.
This analysis could ultimately result in revenue sharing for only football and men's basketball ---- that is the true reality.
Oh and LSU baseball has been a profit sport for many years and I have heard that Arkansas baseball may also be profitable but TN women's basketball never actually turned a profit even under Pat's incredible run ---- the multi-million dollar annual transfer payment to the women's basketball program is how they "cooked the books" for women's basketball.....
Revenue sharing is an interesting concept when most athletic departments around the country actually lose money (or have large infusions of state money) annually because most college sports can't pay their own freight - the freight here again is carried by football and to lesser extend men's basketball.
If title IX ever really became a true issue for revenue sharing then under title IX every college athlete on scholarship should arguably receive the same amount of revenue share regardless of the sport -
that is unless you do the math -
then only profitable sports would receive any revenue sharing.
The House settlement has been appealed due to Title IX issues but the House settlement does not address future revenue sharing. I'm actually surprised that some bright young female college scholarship athlete has not already filed a Title IX suit because she and every other female schollie athlete (and non football playing male scholarship athlete) are not receiving the same amount of revenue share. You must remember that title IX is all about equality - equal number of scholarships for women's sports as men's sports! That suit will arrive eventually and blow the whole revenue sharing model to heck.