No Kings

[FLVOL_79]

Kudos to you for managing to remain (relatively) sane working for the .gov

"Sane". Its weird working for free. Trumps henchmen are all like " we need people who are all in paycheck or not"! That's no one in the history of the world who isn't a slave.

 

[Peradox1K]

You think that would be protected under free speech?

Why not? Just make sure it isn't named.

 

[RavinDave]

"Sane". Its weird working for free. Trumps henchmen are all like " we need people who are all in paycheck or not"! That's no one in the history of the world who isn't a slave.

Don’t try to pull the wool over my eyes. You’re making bank.

 

[Ritzwatch]

Kudos to you for managing to remain (relatively) sane working for the .gov

well, it is easier for him than you might think. He practices self-care by spending most of his working day here on VN.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

“3 consecutive times”… maybe you’re the problem.

Effin’ maybe …he got 3 white kids st GA Tech and tellin us we the problem with white privilege. AND refuses to tell us what he tolt them kids ‘bout locker room sanctuaries…he favors the perverts obviously. Honestly, does anyone take this fool seriously anymore?
Can we all see now how the skewlhouse counselor effed up our kids minds with their sickness?

 

[RavinDave]

well, it is easier for him than you might think. He practices self-care by spending most of his working day here on VN.

He ain’t doin’ much but sh1t-postin’ durin’ this here shutdown, any fool can see that.

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

No, it could be implied I am working for his opposition.

I mean I have spent 2 days telling you what is obvious to a non-loon.

Maybe he gave you and attaboy and rubbed your belly for all that free work you did looking at the Michigan Sec of State site....

We sure know he didnt pay you

 

[LSU-SIU]

Maybe he gave you and attaboy and rubbed your belly for all that free work you did looking at the Michigan Sec of State site....

We sure know he didnt pay you

Its very obvious you don't know me. Most of this isn't worth much at all to a sane person - mostly obvious observations. (Water is wet, there you go free labor)

 

[C-south]

Effin’ maybe …he got 3 white kids st GA Tech and tellin us we the problem with white privilege. AND refuses to tell us what he tolt them kids ‘bout locker room sanctuaries…he favors the perverts obviously. Honestly, does anyone take this fool seriously anymore?

No doubt he’s the poster child for “privilege.” Recognizes it. Lives it. Doesn’t want anyone else to have it. But damn sure isn’t giving it up. Like the time he said he’s all for everyone paying more in taxes but he isn’t going to voluntarily or unless everyone else has to.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

No doubt he’s the poster child for “privilege.” Recognizes it. Lives it. Doesn’t want anyone else to have it. But damn sure isn’t giving it up. Like the time he said he’s all for everyone paying more in taxes but he isn’t going to voluntarily or unless everyone else has to.

Charlatan he is…he preach but won’t tell about the innocent minds he effed up…guilt is a heavy burden. He bought hook line and sinker into Barry Soteros philosophy…won’t never own up though.
Where’s his records at Luther?
All these losers go missin when I come asking fer truth.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Speaking of Kings. There is no statute of limitations for treason.

 

[McDad]

trump didn't run against Hillary or Kamala in the primaries.

I think we are all aware of that. I don't understand your post.

 

[luthervol]

I think we are all aware of that. I don't understand your post.

It was in response to this part of your post.......something to which we were all also aware

The voters found him to be less of a bad choice than they found Hillary and Kamala.

I don't understand what it is you do not understand.
My whole point has been about the importance of the primaries. You're really just proving my point.

 

[LSU-SIU]

It was in response to this part of your post.......something to which we were all also aware


I don't understand what it is you do not understand.
My whole point has been about the importance of the primaries. You're really just proving my point.

There isn't one part of your postings that make sense in the context of the discussion. Its void of reality.

 

[McDad]

Now hang on a dang minute. Those Libertarians are at least open to a third option outside of the two main parties whom continually produce absolutely horrible candidates. Why isn’t it valid to point that out?

It is valid. I support more options; better options.

I just think it's low level mentality when the voters are blamed when the candidate doesn't resonate with voters.

 

[NorthDallas40]

It was in response to this part of your post.......something to which we were all also aware


I don't understand what it is you do not understand.
My whole point has been about the importance of the primaries. You're really just proving my point.

It’s rather poor form to attack the primary results of the other team when your team merely inserts the candidate of choice and skip primaries all together don’t you think? Stones and glass houses and what not.

 

[McDad]

It was in response to this part of your post.......something to which we were all also aware


I don't understand what it is you do not understand.
My whole point has been about the importance of the primaries.

I see. I pivoted from primaries to the election of candidates. Sorry for the confusion. We already had agreement in the primary process is messed up. I am unable to see the value in discussing something the same way, we've already agreed on.

 

[Orangeburst]

nm

 

[luthervol]

It’s rather poor form to attack the primary results of the other team when your team merely inserts the candidate of choice and skip primaries all together don’t you think? Stones and glass houses and what not.

Not really.
The dems had some never before seen circumstances......and they handled them horribly.

That has nothing to do with the 2016, 20, and 24 repub primaries and the choices those voters made.

 

[McDad]

It’s rather poor form to attack the primary results of the other team when your team merely inserts the candidate of choice and skip primaries all together don’t you think? Stones and glass houses and what not.

This is the nature of partisan politics. And Luther is vehemently partisan.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Not really.
The dems had some never before seen circumstances......and they handled them horribly.

That has nothing to do with the 2016, 20, and 24 repub primaries and the choices those voters made.

What, where they don't care how you vote? Let me see, your vote wasn't counted but you don't care about that. You only care about some other group's process that ultimately picked the best candidate?

It would seem like some part of your strategy isn't working, no?

 

[NorthDallas40]

Not really.
The dems had some never before seen circumstances......and they handled them horribly.

That has nothing to do with the 2016, 20, and 24 repub primaries and the choices those voters made.

Ah got it. Excuse away the choices of your team and hold the other team accountable. The Dems actually had primaries in 16, 20, and 24 (well a convention in 24 anyway and I couldn’t type that without laughing out loud) also and got just as horrible results as the Republicans did.

 

[luthervol]

I see. I pivoted from primaries to the election of candidates. Sorry for the confusion. We already had agreement in the primary process is messed up. I am unable to see the value in discussing something the same way, we've already agreed on.

Your statement seemed to more about the primary process.
My stance is the problem isn't with the process as much as with the poor choices of the voters.

 

[NorthDallas40]

This is the nature of partisan politics. And Luther is vehemently partisan.

Indeed. His response was laughable. As usual.

 

[hog88]

"Sane". Its weird working for free. Trumps henchmen are all like " we need people who are all in paycheck or not"! That's no one in the history of the world who isn't a slave.

Or business owner.