No Kings

#601
#601
Are super delegates kinda like a tactic used by a tyrant party?

Superdelegates are party leaders and elected officials in the Democratic Party who are automatically granted delegate status at the national convention and can vote for any candidate, regardless of primary results. They make up about 15% of the total delegates and were created to ensure that experienced party members have a say in the nomination process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and RavinDave
#603
#603
appvol said:
Dude your guy keeping the government shutdown tried to make it look like he was grilling hamburgers raw with cheese on it.
View attachment 783371
Click to expand...
Who controls the Presidency? Who controls the house? Who controls the senate? Here is your orange Jesus explaining what he would do..and its foxnews so it has to be right!



" The President has to be a leader" -Trump.
 
#606
#606
hog88 said:
How is Trump not a moderate?
Click to expand...
depends on how you define a moderate doesn't it? Trump won the R primaries because he was the most extreme of them all.

attacks on the Constitution
anti-green measures
appointing an un-elected official to run this country during Covid (probably the most actually fascist thing he has done and the left never complains about it)
anti-immigration without any type of reforms to "balance" it.
His extreme funding of ICE, larger budget than the rest of the federal "police" agencies combined.
DOGE cuts were extremely one sided.
nothing close to moderate about his foreign policy, its about the most extreme FP we have ever seen, both in good and bad ways.
He makes everything personal and never about the actual policy differences, little to no compromises.

I guess extreme spending is about the only "moderate" thing in his play books.
his extra judicial killings is also sadly pretty "moderate" considering both sides do it.

and by moderate, I just mean both sides do it.

tariffs I guess are pretty politically moderate, it neither respects the free market interests of conservatives, and doesn't comply with the globalized economy of the progressives.
 
#610
#610
luthervol said:
WTH??
Not even close.

Click to expand...

Luther, you shouldn't be listening to those. I said last summer that the real numbers were given to the real people in charge, not you. And the numbers were bad for anyone they replaced with Joe.

You are going to have to find a good candidate, but the problem is they don't care what you think.

https://www.economist.com/interactive/us-2024-election/prediction-model/president

On the final day, Kamala Harris moves into a narrow lead​


Last updated on November 5th 2024
Click to expand...

Trump isn't going to be running, so I guess your problem with be solve but not by your doing.

Trump and Vance would like you to think your strategy is working? So, I guess you think it's working. Well, get back to work for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peradox1K and Orange_Crush
#613
#613
LouderVol said:
not really. unless you maintained your vote in the general election too.

otherwise its "all about the primaries" until you are told to fall in line behind the appointed candidate. you are all about the primaries, when its politically convenient, not when it matters.

heck the Democrats have actively manipulated their primaries twice now. They lied about Joe and appointed Kamala, and kicked out Bernie to make sure Hillary got the support. if you actually cared about the primaries there is no way you would ever vote alongside the party with the worst manipulation of the system.

at least Trump actually won his primaries. Even as the "incumbent" he faced more resistance than Biden or Kamala did.
Click to expand...
Some nonsensical conclusions in there. (highlighted)

The rest of your post proves my point; which is people need to be smarter with their votes in the primaries.

The people have failed more than the system.
 
#614
#614
FLVOL_79 said:
Who controls the Presidency? Who controls the house? Who controls the senate? Here is your orange Jesus explaining what he would do..and its foxnews so it has to be right!



" The President has to be a leader" -Trump.
Click to expand...

Clean CR that’s been passed 13 times before. Who is scared that AOC will take him out
 
#619
#619
Carp said:
In that case, it's still a tie at 269.
Click to expand...
Yeah .... the 2 most hotly contested states were Georgia and Arizona ..... Even if Trump had won both of those states, he still loses the election. Is that better? LOL.

Michigan and Pennsylvania were not very close as I recall. Biden won Michigan by well over 100,000 votes and Biden won Pennsylvania by about 70,000 votes.
 
#621
#621
luthervol said:
Some nonsensical conclusions in there. (highlighted)

The rest of your post proves my point; which is people need to be smarter with their votes in the primaries.

The people have failed more than the system.
Click to expand...

No, they didn't count your vote.

You are a very confused person.
 
#624
#624
luthervol said:
So your statement was untrue.

No need to apologize or admit it......simply par for the course.
Click to expand...
I am convinced that Trump's popularity--on the mean--is on the upswing, especially in comparison to the popularity of the Dems, which was the context of the statement that you cherry-picked.

Last I looked, which wasn't long ago at all, the Dems are experiencing a MASSIVE loss of voter registrations while the Rs are experiencing massive gains. THAT is the context of the statement, independent of the polls that lied to us about Hillary's/Kamala's campaign leads.

The proof of the statement will be in the pudding, so...

Again, it will be shown in the midterms. I'll see you there, and I'll be gracious. I'll bring you tissues.
 
#625
#625
luthervol said:
Some nonsensical conclusions in there. (highlighted)

The rest of your post proves my point; which is people need to be smarter with their votes in the primaries.

The people have failed more than the system.
Click to expand...
nonsensical but backed by two real world cases. really speaks to your mindset when it requires ignoring real life evidence.

can you remind me when the Rs appointed a candidate?
or used super delegates to change the results of the primary?
because I gave examples of my claims.

or at the least when Rs manipulated the primaries worse than those two cases?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top