No Kings

#530
#530
Not surprisingly Luther's thoughts are a figment of imagination. I searched for:
+ No Kings protest purpose.
+ No Kings protest meaning.
+ No Kings protest intent.

Every hit was about Trump and Trump Admin. It's hard to reconcile the protest to voting more moderately especially because DJT isn't running again.

Google summary:
The No Kings protests, also known internationally as the No Dictators or No Tyrants protests, is a series of demonstrations, largely in the United States, against what the organizers describe as authoritarian policies of Donald Trump and corruption in his administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#532
#532
McDad said:
Not surprisingly Luther's thoughts are a figment of imagination. I searched for:
+ No Kings protest purpose.
+ No Kings protest meaning.
+ No Kings protest intent.

Every hit was about Trump and Trump Admin. It's hard to reconcile the protest to voting more moderately especially because DJT isn't running again.

Google summary:
The No Kings protests, also known internationally as the No Dictators or No Tyrants protests, is a series of demonstrations, largely in the United States, against what the organizers describe as authoritarian policies of Donald Trump and corruption in his administration.
Click to expand...

No King is where you support elected officials that work with foreign governments/agents to swing an election against a party Presidential candidate, a Presidential elect and secretly undermine a sitting President using information you know is false and criminal nature.

Luther's problem is his own behavior, meaning supporting these people and they keep doing the same thing over and over. Than he complains because people vote for Trump when all he did was support insane loser candidates. Here in a few years they're going to give him another loser and he is going to complain about Vancism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peradox1K and InVOLuntary
#533
#533
BernardKingGOAT said:
Someone was making fun of it in an extremely ignorant manner in another thread. It's as if these Trump humpers have no idea or concept of how and why the USA was founded. Sadly they are more patriotic to a President putting himself ahead of the country than they are for the country itself.
Click to expand...

You support a party that completely subverted the vote of the people and forced the sitting POTUS to back out of the Presidential race in favor of a candidate that did not receive a single vote from the American public.

But sure.... no kings!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, HammondB3Vol, SpaceCoastVol and 3 others
#534
#534
Vol737 said:
How is what going to work? Sure there is a pendulum. Just stated how there is. I’m just saying with each changing of the guard in the executive and judicial branch, you will see each party push their agenda further left or right. And no, I don’t see any new party on the horizon with enough influence to push things to the center.
Click to expand...
You know when that pendulum swings hard enough it spins all the way around to hit someone in the ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and Vol737
#535
#535
LouderVol said:
again if you read the actual article it covers that. it notes that the Republicans divorce mostly after the kids have moved out. maintaining a two parent household for the family. only divorcing after the kids move out. seems pretty "family value" to me.
Click to expand...
It also doesn't break down urban vs suburban..it the same sad argument they try and make with crime in red states...if a logic fallacy and manipulation tatic
 
#536
#536
Carp said:
You support a party that completely subverted the vote of the people and forced the sitting POTUS to back out of the Presidential race in favor of a candidate that did not receive a single vote from the American public.

But sure.... no kings!!!!!!
Click to expand...
I didn't support the Democratic party in any form or fashion. I do appreciate your extremely ignorant assumption though. Nice, dumbass
 
#537
#537
The Original Fade said:
As a conservative I have to say I’ve never heard of a “Jews will not replace us” movement or protest, nor would I participate in such nonsense
Click to expand...
At a rally called "Unite the Right," which was held in Charlottesville, Virginia in August of 2017, white nationalists who were protesting the removal of Confederate statues, repeated the "Jews will not replace us" chant while marching with torches.

It was big news at the time. I can post a YouTube video of it, if you want?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey123
#538
#538
McDad said:
Not surprisingly Luther's thoughts are a figment of imagination. I searched for:
+ No Kings protest purpose.
+ No Kings protest meaning.
+ No Kings protest intent.

Every hit was about Trump and Trump Admin. It's hard to reconcile the protest to voting more moderately especially because DJT isn't running again.

Google summary:
The No Kings protests, also known internationally as the No Dictators or No Tyrants protests, is a series of demonstrations, largely in the United States, against what the organizers describe as authoritarian policies of Donald Trump and corruption in his administration.
Click to expand...
Sometimes it helps to read between the lines.
trump would not have authoritarian policies, rampant corruption in his administration, nor be a tyrant if people elected more moderate candidates.

Actually, we never would have had trump.
 
#540
#540
luthervol said:
Sometimes it helps to read between the lines.
trump would not have authoritarian policies, rampant corruption in his administration, nor be a tyrant if people elected more moderate candidates.

Actually, we never would have had trump.
Click to expand...
Never would have Trump if Ds ran better candidates. I mean, Joe B couldn't get out of primaries if his life depended on it won. Think about how the public saw Hills and Kamala for them to lose while Joe won.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peradox1K, LouderVol and Carp
#541
#541
luthervol said:
Sometimes it helps to read between the lines.
trump would not have authoritarian policies, rampant corruption in his administration, nor be a tyrant if people elected more moderate candidates.

Actually, we never would have had trump.
Click to expand...

So, the problem is people don't vote for the candidates which you endorse which are responsible for working with foreign governments to overthrow candidates and the government here. And if people would just listen to you, none of that would have had to happen?

How is this strategy working out?
 
#542
#542
Carp said:
You support a party that completely subverted the vote of the people and forced the sitting POTUS to back out of the Presidential race in favor of a candidate that did not receive a single vote from the American public.

But sure.... no kings!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Isn't that what Donald Trump tried to do after losing the 2020 Presidential Election?

Donald Trump devised a "fake elector" scheme and publicly pressured his Vice President to cast aside electoral college votes, during the formal process of certification, from swing states that they had lost. Was that showing respect for the democratic system of elections in the United States?

The Republican Party has absolutely no moral high ground on which to stand, when it comes to subverting the vote of the American people in a Presidential election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#543
#543
luthervol said:
Sometimes it helps to read between the lines.
trump would not have authoritarian policies, rampant corruption in his administration, nor be a tyrant if people elected more moderate candidates.

Actually, we never would have had trump.
Click to expand...
But you voted for Biden, and Harris. neither of those were very moderate.

and I am willing to bet you had the exact same argument going back before Trump. you have probably never really supported a moderate option, you have probably always supported the party line. because whomever on the right was too extreme. and you HAD to get this election right, so that the next time you could actually vote for that moderate, but that next time never comes.

don't worry, its the same on the right. they voted for Bush, Cheney, Romney just so Kerry/Obama didn't get elected.

YOU are responsible for the very thing you claim to be against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, BreatheUT, Vol since 77 and 2 others
#544
#544
BowlBrother85 said:
Isn't that what Donald Trump tried to do after losing the 2020 Presidential Election?

Donald Trump devised a "fake elector" scheme and publicly pressured his Vice President to cast aside electoral college votes, during the formal process of certification, from swing states that they had lost. Was that showing respect for the democratic system of elections in the United States?
Click to expand...

If the blue cities had been working lawfully, but that is a big IF, no? I mean, you act like this all alien but the truth of the matter is that is exactly what happened in 2016 at the federal level.

The bigger problem in 2016 is that is was treason with foreign governments and their agents.

Regardless, is this strategy working out?
 
#547
#547
BowlBrother85 said:
Isn't that what Donald Trump tried to do after losing the 2020 Presidential Election?

Donald Trump devised a "fake elector" scheme and publicly pressured his Vice President to cast aside electoral college votes, during the formal process of certification, from swing states that they had lost. Was that showing respect for the democratic system of elections in the United States?

The Republican Party has absolutely no moral high ground on which to stand, when it comes to subverting the vote of the American people in a Presidential election.
Click to expand...

Even if I agreed that is what he tried to do, he clearly didn't succeed. The Democrats 100% subverted the vote of the people last election. It's not even a discussion.
 
#548
#548
BowlBrother85 said:
Isn't that what Donald Trump tried to do after losing the 2020 Presidential Election?

Donald Trump devised a "fake elector" scheme and publicly pressured his Vice President to cast aside electoral college votes, during the formal process of certification, from swing states that they had lost. Was that showing respect for the democratic system of elections in the United States?

The Republican Party has absolutely no moral high ground on which to stand, when it comes to subverting the vote of the American people in a Presidential election.
Click to expand...
It was dismissed ...

www.yahoo.com

Accused Michigan fake electors charges dismissed

LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — District Court Judge Kristen Simmons has announced that 15 Republicans, accused of acting as fake electors during the 2020 presidential election, will not stand trial and all of the charges are now dismissed. The 15 people faced several criminal charges filed by Michigan...
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
 
#549
#549
Matt2496 said:
Click to expand...

I looked for a thread to discuss a sidebar I am about to introduce. I don't want to derail this thread but Matt's post serves as a good launching point.

As part of protected speech I can burn a flag, hang an effigy of a politician, shred a copy of the Constitution, hold a plastic or rubber severed head of a politician.

Here's my question: Can I shoot an effigy of the president with a hunting rifle in a manner that a sniper would do it? Do you think that is an expression of free speech on the same level as the other examples?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, Peradox1K and InVOLuntary
#550
#550
LouderVol said:
But you voted for Biden, and Harris. neither of those were very moderate.

and I am willing to bet you had the exact same argument going back before Trump. you have probably never really supported a moderate option, you have probably always supported the party line. because whomever on the right was too extreme. and you HAD to get this election right, so that the next time you could actually vote for that moderate, but that next time never comes.

don't worry, its the same on the right. they voted for Bush, Cheney, Romney just so Kerry/Obama didn't get elected.

YOU are responsible for the very thing you claim to be against.
Click to expand...

He doesn't want to take responsibility. Its always someone else's fault.

If you don't vote for his criminal corrupt candidate, you must be a Nazi sympathizer. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and Peradox1K
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top