LegionnaireOfTheMiserable
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2024
- Messages
- 3,014
- Likes
- 4,481
“First he had to take out all home games”Sure it is.
Look at how carefully contrived this is.
First, he had to take out all home games. Because that wouldn't make the Vols look bad.
Then he had to take out all neutral site games, bowl games, and so on. Same reason.
Then he had to restrict it to Top 10 teams. Not Top 15, not Top 25, just Top 10.
That latter step is rather arbitrary. Why not Top 12? Why not Top 5? Or Top 3?
Because the person setting the conditions was looking for a result (to talk down the Vols) and selected the criteria that best allowed him to do that.
Not buying it.
Reality isn't really reality if it is a contrived subset of reality. Mark Twain famously pointed that out.
Go Vols!
p.s. Here's a litmus test to demonstrate just how janky this is.
Question 1: Have the Vols beaten Top 10 teams since Josh Heupel became our head coach?
Question 1: Have the Vols beaten Top 10 teams away from home since Josh Heupel became our head coach?
Question 2: Have the Vols beaten Top 10 teams on away games since Josh Heupel became our head coach?
The answer to the first two questions is, "yes." The answer to the last is "no." That's how carefully calibrated the criteria were.
“Top 10 is arbitrary.”
We are playing on the road, so that’s pretty relevant. People use Top 10 all the time. Media, fans, Sportscenter, David Letterman, etc. Neutral site games are not “away” games and are a totally different animal.
Unbelievable levels of delusion and spin from you. But in the off chance we win, you’ll be the first person talking about how massive it is to beat a top 10 Bama team on the road after trying to argue that beating Iowa in a meaningless bowl game is as good as any other win.


