That's racist!

Lmao. "Right on queue" should have been an indicator of intelligence as well

Just imagine being the type of person to judge a SB act on their nationality, and then put that shiz out there with on the web with your name on it. Not at all like saying a blockade justifies 58 years of war crimes on an anonymous message board 😆 , which I hope people would have the good sense not to put their name on or say to anybody IRL.
 
Guess which sports media company he works for? Hasn't deleted the tweet. Hasn't admitted wrong. Hasn't apologized.


View attachment 779894

So because he is employed by Fox, you're attempting to label the network and those who watch it as supporters of their "racist propaganda"?

Similar to how the Cincinnati city official posted a statement, more or less saying whitey got what they deserved. Was she reprimanded in anyway? Don't think so.
 
So because he is employed by Fox, you're attempting to label the network and those who watch it as supporters of their "racist propaganda"?

Similar to how the Cincinnati city official posted a statement, more or less saying whitey got what they deserved. Was she reprimanded in anyway? Don't think so.

Where did you get all that? Wth
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
View attachment 781545

they found 19 "problematic" "texts" amongst 28,000+ posts across 2900 different threads from teenagers. and one of those problematic texts was "Yooooooo" with no context. I am surprised its that little, or these are the worst. I would be interested in seeing the context, the article doesn't offer any and I couldn't find a link to more.


go mining on the internet for terrible things and you will find them. this author must not spend any time on the internet.
 
they found 19 "problematic" "texts" amongst 28,000+ posts across 2900 different threads from teenagers. and one of those problematic texts was "Yooooooo" with no context. I am surprised its that little, or these are the worst. I would be interested in seeing the context, the article doesn't offer any and I couldn't find a link to more.


go mining on the internet for terrible things and you will find them. this author must not spend any time on the internet.

What is an acceptable number messages praising Hitler, talking about gasing people?

I'm guessing for you it's greater than 19?
 
What is an acceptable number messages praising Hitler, talking about gasing people?

I'm guessing for you it's greater than 19?

I guess you've never been in the Israel/hamas thread. Theres 3 or 4 posters over there that are Lefties like you who might as well get "Death to Israel" tattooed on their foreheads. They believe every single word uttered by a garbage terrorist group that kidnapped, raped, and sexually mutilated over 1200 people mostly old women and children. They hate the Jews. Dont waste any effort hiding that, which I can at least respect that. No need to pretend to be something you aren't.

The Democrats/Lefties/Marxists are OPENLY antisemitic, anti Israel and against Jews on many college campuses across this nation. There is open and shameless Jew hate online everywhere from the Left these days. To try and pin that crap on the Right leaning folks is just plain ridiculous. Its not just myopic , it is intentionally deceptive and plain old FOS. Your ilk made their bed...let them sleep in it. If any Jew in this country votes for the party of Hamas and intifada then they deserve the consequences of that cognitive dissonance. Its like gays being pro-Hamas...when those worthless goathumpers would execute both the gays and Jews given the opportunity. Its like chickens stumping for KFC. Brilliant.
 
What is an acceptable number messages praising Hitler, talking about gasing people?

I'm guessing for you it's greater than 19?
none are "acceptable". and it wasn't 19 praising Hitler. it was 19 bad messages, one of which was "yoooooo", only 6 were pro Hitler/gas chamber. regardless, at most 0.4%, or 0.02%, of the possible messages were bad, and the author wants to claim that represents the totality of what this group represents. without any context.

I will repeat it again because I know its a concept you struggle with, I am not defending those specific messages, I am just pointing out its a crap argument. you dig thru 28k young democratic messages I am willing to bet you can find 6 that praise the bad actions of stalin/mao or some other communist leader. does it mean that group as a whole are problematic extremists?

this is just a classic case of one side claiming the extremes of the other represent the majority of the other.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top