bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 75,644
- Likes
- 56,542
I think Scott is a high ceiling largely potential type, he’s 6’8” easy maybe pushing 6’9” and very well may not be done growing. He’s very thin and probably at least a year or 2 away from being ready to contribute a bunch unless he has a monster next 6 months. Green physically is much more ready to roll, he’s a bit like Amari Evans in that he’s a plus defender, but has a developed 3pt shot from what I’ve gathered, I think physically he’s ready to contribute at the college level. I think both guys could be 3/4 at the college level, depending on quickness and shot maybe Green could play some 2 as I think he could guard it.Without having seen Green play, what are the primary differences in him and Scott, in your opinion? Based solely on body types, they seem redundant.