Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

If students wanted to form such a club they could. It's enforced groupthink when the state mandates the club be formed.
No, it's not. And you've been incapable of showing that it is.

It's stupid, and a likely waste of resources for TurningPoint to try to put chapters in schools where they would not be attended. It's likely an empty, meaningless thing since they can't force TPUSA to put a chapter in a school any more than they can force students to attend a chapter. We can all wholeheartedly agree that it is a stupid and vacuous political stunt.

But it is nowhere near forced groupthink. Come one, man. You're usually better than this.
 
No parents can opt out of the teaching of the bible in schools or tpusa...but everyone within town limits is forces to listen to the call to prayer..they don't get a choice to not hear the call to prayer...
Would you support a town playing Christian hymns or prayers all day long???
The town is not broadcasting the call to prayer. A mosque(s) is/are. Do you see the difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
The town is not broadcasting the call to prayer. A mosque(s) is/are. Do you see the difference?
In violation of noise ordinance. That's my only problem with it. You shouldn't allow a specific group to break an ordinance you enforce on everyone else. Either lift the ordinance or enforce it on everyone equally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
I have never once heard someone use that. The definition says it’s British?

Take it in the shorts
Take it on the chin

Those are idioms we would recognize.

Take it in the neck was intentional.

She doesn’t write her own stuff (she can barely read her own stuff), but she’s ultimately accountable for it. And it was pretty disgusting imo.
I hadn't heard it before either but I don't see what's disgusting about it.
 
Bc that’s what Ice Agents are dealing with. I don’t agree with masks but I also want the Ice Agents and families kept safe. I’m not sure what the answer is to this situation.
Was the shooter targeting only agents not wearing masks? I don't see a link. Even if something like that's a regular occurrence it wouldn't justify agents concealing their identity.
 
I mean to me, that is what doxxing actually meant. it was something actually carried out, whether it was getting them fired, suspended, arrested, swatted, killed whatever.

I didn't realize "doxxing" meant only giving out publicly accessible information. that is such an insanely low bar to be worried about that it doesn't even bare consideration. Paparazzi about to become terrorists.
LOL
Give us your name and address and we can then post it on the Internet IDing you as an Ice Agent. You can then deal with the ramifications from the "low bar".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
wide-eyes-ok.gif
some of us have jobs that require us to communicate directly with various government officials, including the feds.

Or, I guess you must be pretty young and are too intimidated to try and look someone up to call them. probably more of a email or Teams person I bet.
 
again, having a picture of someone does not make it appreciably easier to doxx someone if you already have their name and whatever identification number.

yall are accepting of far bigger/better pieces of information that leads to doxxing. but having a picture is too far? I don't even know what to compare this to. I guess its like the dems who focus on gun deaths, while ignoring all the other far more prevalent preventable deaths out there.
If the picture does not make it easier and brings no value, then why do they not want masks on the ICE agents so they can then take their picture?
 
LOL
Give us your name and address and we can then post it on the Internet IDing you as an Ice Agent. You can then deal with the ramifications from the "low bar".
my picture is on this website. should be really easy for you to ID me, there are multiple people who know me IRL and would be able to corroborate if you have the right guy.

if it makes you feel better just post my initials, it would still be enough to prove your point.

I get spam calls, almost daily. I guarantee you its not because of my picture.
 
my picture is on this website. should be really easy for you to ID me, there are multiple people who know me IRL and would be able to corroborate if you have the right guy.

if it makes you feel better just post my initials, it would still be enough to prove your point.

I get spam calls, almost daily. I guarantee you its not because of my picture.
What you would get being ID'd as an ICE agent is more than spam calls.
 
If the picture does not make it easier and brings no value, then why do they not want masks on the ICE agents so they can then take their picture?
I have to have justification for why the government shouldn't do something? Something that isn't in the Constitution?

my default is: if its called out in the Constitution, the government should do it. if it isn't called out in the Constitution, the government shouldn't do it.

masking of federal/government anybodies isn't one of the enumerated powers in the Constitution, therefor they shouldn't do it. sorry that bothers so many people.
 
In violation of noise ordinance. That's my only problem with it. You shouldn't allow a specific group to break an ordinance you enforce on everyone else. Either lift the ordinance or enforce it on everyone equally.
Which ordinance is being violated? If the town council allows it, is an ordinance which would prohibit it still valid?
 
Which ordinance is being violated? If the town council allows it, is an ordinance which would prohibit it still valid?
I'm not sure but from an article I read the call to prayer is exempt from noise ordinance but it's enforced otherwise. I could be wrong, it happened once, just ask my wife she'll tell you all about it
 
I'm not sure but from an article I read the call to prayer is exempt from noise ordinance but it's enforced otherwise. I could be wrong, it happened once, just ask my wife she'll tell you all about it
It should be, in my opinion, the same for every group. I'll try to see if I can find anything about an exemption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KB5252
I have to have justification for why the government shouldn't do something? Something that isn't in the Constitution?

my default is: if its called out in the Constitution, the government should do it. if it isn't called out in the Constitution, the government shouldn't do it.

masking of federal/government anybodies isn't one of the enumerated powers in the Constitution, therefor they shouldn't do it. sorry that bothers so many people.
Wanting ICE agents to go home to their families each and every night like all other citizens under the Constitution should not bother so many people as well.
 
some of us have jobs that require us to communicate directly with various government officials, including the feds.

Or, I guess you must be pretty young and are too intimidated to try and look someone up to call them. probably more of a email or Teams person I bet.
LOL.

I have enough common sense to know it would be easier to find someone when I have a photo and a last name rather than just one or the other.
 
Wanting ICE agents to go home to their families each and every night like all other citizens under the Constitution should not bother so many people as well.
Louder:

"Hey, I hate for him that they've killed him, his wife and children and burned his house down but at least the illegal immigrant got to see who took him into custody."
 
Advertisement

Back
Top