Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

You have a right to say what ever you want by the 1st amendment.

However in civil society you don't have a right to say what ever you want and have ideas that goes against civil society without consequences.

There for you don't have a right to go to school, hold a job or be accepted when you celebrate the murder of a good person.
Unless of course the hate speech is pro trump or pro whatever trump supports. You can salute Israel all day and keep your job right? Despite the fact they’ve killed tons of women and children. But say something about this clowns death? Oh that’s crossing the line. Give me a break
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
Last edited:
Unless of course the hate speech is pro trump or pro whatever trump supports. You can salute Israel all day and keep your job right? Despite the fact they’ve killed tons of women and children. But say something about this clowns death? Oh that’s crossing the line. Give me a break
So you think Charlie Kirk was a clown?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
I honestly don’t know how some democrats will be able to cope without their primary boogeyman.
For a decade now; he has been their white whale to their Captain Ahab obsession
they will do what the republicans did after Obama left. just claim the next Republican is really Trump's third term. that Trump is the power behind whomever.
 
thoughts are don't trust AI to make judgement calls.

using AI is relying on a false expert. we pretend it brings some level of credibility to random thoughts, it doesn't.
AI is huge in my industry. It can be superficially helpful for such things, but that's about it.
 
So you think Charlie Kirk was a clown?

Charlie Kirk has never said a hateful thing. Post one thing not clipped or out of context where he said something hateful to anyone.
When he got shot he was literally trying to correlate trans people with mass shootings. This is spreading hatred towards a group of people. This is no different than the left trying to label all white cops as killers of innocent black people. When the left tells people this, what do you say? You say not all cops are bad but some are. But the bad cops aren’t the majority right? And I agree. But this applies to the trans community too, some are bad but most are not. When the left jumps to calling all white cops racist I fight against that nonsense too.
 
thoughts are don't trust AI to make judgement calls.

using AI is relying on a false expert. we pretend it brings some level of credibility to random thoughts, it doesn't.

Yeah, that's a terrible use of an LLM.

Also, just apply Occam's razor. Is it more likely that the government is conspiring to fake texts (that can be validated through the courts/cell carriers) or that weird kids text weird things?
 
When he got shot he was literally trying to correlate trans people with mass shootings. This is spreading hatred towards a group of people. This is no different than the left trying to label all white cops as killers of innocent black people. When the left tells people this, what do you say? You say not all cops are bad but some are. But the bad cops aren’t the majority right? And I agree. But this applies to the trans community too, some are bad but most are not. When the left jumps to calling all white cops racist I fight against that nonsense too.
LOL Just because you think it's hateful doesn't mean it is.
 
LOL Just because you think it's hateful doesn't mean it is.
Whatever fits your narrative right? I just gave you 2 examples about both sides being wrong bc I’m not bias and you’re so brainwashed you’ll validate hate speech on one side but not the other. Keep bootlicking.
 
Yeah, that's a terrible use of an LLM.

Also, just apply Occam's razor. Is it more likely that the government is conspiring to fake texts (that can be validated through the courts/cell carriers) or that weird kids text weird things?
or just recognizing that's not the actual texts, its a transcript of boomer reading the texts. AI completely misses any context not directly included in the prompt.
 
Obama's cronies did those things at the very end of his second term. No reason to impeach him. Nixon's aides were doing it in his first term.
Obama signed off on it, encouraged it. He was in the middle of it. Does it really matter when it was done to condemn it? Or is it one of those "He got away with it" so it's ok? And I completely disagree, it is 100% a indicator of Marxism.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top