Recruiting Forum Football Talk IX

#16,526
#16,526
Chas Nimrods will have more receiving yards and receptions in one year at South Florida then he had at Tennessee in 3 years. Yes, I know he probably RS his first season...
 
#16,534
#16,534
Ulysees E. McGill said:
And this is just one more reason to hate Dabo...this one is absolutely pathetic..it shows the whole world how small and pathetic that smarmy slimy little dweeb really is.

He has no honor, just a total fraud charlatan.
Click to expand...
I dunno...

1) Was it true?
2) Was it known/knowable publicly, without any special or secret investigation?
3) Was the rule twisted or lawyered at all to be applied to this situation?

I think, in this case, Clemson is only guilty of reminding the ruling authority to do the correct and usual thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hardy and drvenner
#16,541
#16,541
RandomUTfan said:
The problem with schools that are funded at the level of Wisconsin is if they actually do develop a stud OL he's going to transfer somewhere else who can afford to pay him more because the market for OL is robust. There's more demand than supply.
Click to expand...

2023 & 2024 they had a C drafted in the 2nd and 4th rounds. Most recent draft a T drafted in the 7th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52
#16,544
#16,544
HoleInTheRoof said:
My new fear is Florida fires Napier and hires Golesh.

I’m gonna have to root for Florida to win just enough games to keep Napier around
Click to expand...
I'm going to assuage your fears by explaining why I'm not afraid: Florida not only had to hire Napier (whom LSU evaluated and rejected) but they had to give him the sort of contract where it makes no financial sense to fire him early even if he disappoints considerably. And when they do fire him, they will be in a very similar situation as they were in previously. The UAA is a ridiculously corrupt organization with oversized power where the ex-AD Jeremy Foley is still pulling strings behind the scenes and the current AD is basically a figurehead who raises money and does little decision-making. No coach like Golesh or even Curt Cignetti would leave the situations they are in to coach at Florida. They don't even know who their president will be. A carefully selected appointee was rejected, I think by the State, and they are JUST trying to appoint an interim. I don't think anyone wants that job honestly. It's been empty since the Senator suddenly bolted amid corruption allegations.

The biggest detractor for decent coaches? Their NIL situation is still a mess and they have the stain of a current lawsuit naming the Head Coach as committing fraud promising a recruit money they knew they would never be able to pay him. DJ Lagway is getting big money from outside brands to play at Florida—not from their NIL Collective, and he's the only one with that sort of luxury. Every year Florida has lost guys they would have preferred to keep to the portal and disappointed fans with their portal haul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drvenner, UpstateVol613, OptimusPrimerib and 2 others
#16,545
#16,545
MoCo_Vol said:
There is a difference between some teams taking a chance on him and Florida firing Napier to hire him though.

South Florida was in a bad spot because Jeff Scott was bad, but it's a pretty good spot to land for a first time HC. Talent rich state in a great location playing in a shared stadium with a NFL team.

Just think folks might be overreacting a bit to blowing out a Boise State team that had a generational talent carrying them last season...they've only won 10 games twice since 2019 were overrated and Alex was ready.

USF now plays at Florida and then at Miami...if they win one of those then Alex might be picking his spot this off season.

He's a good coach and I wanna see him do well. But hasn't exactly established himself to be an elite HC or anything at this point.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. I was just thinking if he has an exceptional season this year I could see programs like Kentucky or Arkansas him a shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoCo_Vol
#16,550
#16,550
BruisedOrange said:
I dunno...

1) Was it true?
2) Was it known/knowable publicly, without any special or secret investigation?
3) Was the rule twisted or lawyered at all to be applied to this situation?

I think, in this case, Clemson is only guilty of reminding the ruling authority to do the correct and usual thing.
Click to expand...
You people love rats...😏
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BruisedOrange
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top