President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#38,651
#38,651
BigOrangeMojo said:
Im a very strong fiscal conservative. Tiny fed govt. Efficient. Limited duties. Little to no regulations. Im probably as consistent of a fiscal conservative as there is here. Im not like a lot of the "conservavtives" here who will bend their beliefs to be in alignment with Trump 100% of the time. My beliefs are more important than an undying devotion to a morally deviant politician.

Socially, Im probably left of center. Once again, limited govt influence. Let people make their choices. Not opposed to gay marriage. Not for abortion bans in first 20 weeks or so. For all the exceptions in abortion. I just dont want the govt paying for it or supporting PP.
Click to expand...
Ok you called him morally deviant politician but think it’s ok to kill a baby up to 20 weeks which is 4 and half months.

Most people vote on social issues this day and age than how much money the government is spending it seems because both parties spend like crazy.
 
#38,652
#38,652
appvol said:
Ok you called him morally deviant politician but think it’s ok to kill a baby up to 20 weeks which is 4 and half months.

Most people vote on social issues this day and age than how much money the government is spending it seems because both parties spend like crazy.
Click to expand...

I am personally oppossed to abortion except for the exceptions (which includes statutory rape). However, I am not for the govt being involved in that decision. The only time where I might be for govt intervention after 22-24 weeks when fetus can survive outside body. But 3rd trimester abortions for non medical reasons is
rare so unsure of need to legislate that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: appvol
#38,653
#38,653
Buddy’s Bandit said:
I am totally against Illeagal immagration. Look at the lives that have been wasted ( California Truck Driver is the latest example) and the tax money that has been spent on this.

Regarding the Trans issue….follow your own policy. They need to do their thing and leave me alone. Do not try to infiltrate your beliefs and morals on me and my kids/grandkids.
Click to expand...
Keep this in mind when conversing with some here .

Correcting someone's grammar in an online forum, especially when paired with an insult, often signals a weak argument. It suggests the person is focusing on superficial errors rather than engaging with the substance of the discussion. Grammar corrections can be a distraction tactic, used to undermine the opponent’s credibility instead of addressing their points directly. This is particularly true if the correction is irrelevant to the argument’s logic or evidence. Insulting someone alongside the correction further weakens the arguer’s position, as it shows an inability to stay composed or rely on reasoned rebuttals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
#38,654
#38,654
BigOrangeMojo said:
I am personally oppossed to abortion except for the exceptions (which includes statutory rape). However, I am not for the govt being involved in that decision. The only time where I might be for govt intervention after 22-24 weeks when fetus can survive outside body. But 3rd trimester abortions for non medical reasons is
rare so unsure of need to legislate that.
Click to expand...
I baby can survive at 20 weeks also. I’m more willing to agree in the 1st few weeks.
 
#38,656
#38,656
swampfoxfan said:
I'm not ok with killing ,you (I think) are better than that.
I'm also not ok with demonizing a population due to actions of a very small percentage of others. I can turn this around and charge you with giving support to Americans murdering Americans.

Illegal immigrants are here to earn a living and support family. They do all they can to not attract attention. Gang members are not,but not all immigrants are not here to harm you as you suggest.

Tell me one instance that an illegal immigrants has harmed you or a family member.
Click to expand...
This is unreal….let’s start with this. Are you OK with your tax $’s going to Illeagal immigration? It is unsustainable!!

This is the US not El USA. They are Illeagal!!

I do agree the majority are here to earn a living, BUT those that are here with ill intent are one too many. To date, I have not been directly harmed but what if it does happen tomorrow? Is that OK? Why does that matter??? By the way, I do know some friends who have been impacted by II.

Have this discussion with the family who last their family in Florida or Laken Riley’s family. I think your thoughts would change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
#38,657
#38,657
whodeycin85 said:
Keep this in mind when conversing with some here .

Correcting someone's grammar in an online forum, especially when paired with an insult, often signals a weak argument. It suggests the person is focusing on superficial errors rather than engaging with the substance of the discussion. Grammar corrections can be a distraction tactic, used to undermine the opponent’s credibility instead of addressing their points directly. This is particularly true if the correction is irrelevant to the argument’s logic or evidence. Insulting someone alongside the correction further weakens the arguer’s position, as it shows an inability to stay composed or rely on reasoned rebuttals.
Click to expand...
OK but I don't think I was correcting grammar.

If anyone needs help with that, it’s me!
 
#38,659
#38,659
Buddy’s Bandit said:
This is unreal….let’s start with this. Are you OK with your tax $’s going to Illeagal immigration? It is unsustainable!!

This is the US not El USA. They are Illeagal!!

I do agree the majority are here to earn a living, BUT those that are here with ill intent are one too many. To date, I have not been directly harmed but what if it does happen tomorrow? Is that OK? Why does that matter??? By the way, I do know some friends who have been impacted by II.

Have this discussion with the family who last their family in Florida or Laken Riley’s family. I think your thoughts would change.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how much of my tax dollars are going to illegal immigrants. I'm a little more aware of how much food prices are increasing. I'm not sure how many of my tax dollars are going to support Israel killing children in gaza,but I oppose it.
 
#38,668
#38,668
Buddy’s Bandit said:
See…..you all only attack our solutions. YOu never do the hard work of coming up with solutions AND implementing them. This is the Democratic Party biggest issue. Attack, attack, attack, Republicans solutions without providing a thoughtful solution of your own And then IMPLEMENTING the solution.

I am not for the military being used in every city where we have crime but I am also not for Democrats sitting there doing nothing other than manufacturing numbers to improve their standing with the electorate.

Trump has legal standing to provide military in DC and he has done it. It has worked. He is saving lives and reducing crime. I don’t see anything wrong with that and , based on the interviews I have seen, neither do the citizens of DC Particularly when the mayor is vacationing in Martha’s Vineyard. IN fact, they welcome it.

Now, PROVIDE YOUR SOLUTION. I welcome your thoughts.
Click to expand...

You can't speak for people who live in a city you've only read about.

You can't claim this as "your" solution. Trump could pinch off a steaming turd in the middle of Pennsylvania Ave in the name of lowering crime and you'd agree with it. That's the problem.

DC's crime late was the lowest it had been in 30 years. Fact. Deploying the NG is not the only solution to lowering crime. Fact. There are cities with higher crime rates where he won't deploy the NG. Fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and BernardKingGOAT
#38,669
#38,669
whodeycin85 said:
Keep this in mind when conversing with some here .

Correcting someone's grammar in an online forum, especially when paired with an insult, often signals a weak argument. It suggests the person is focusing on superficial errors rather than engaging with the substance of the discussion. Grammar corrections can be a distraction tactic, used to undermine the opponent’s credibility instead of addressing their points directly. This is particularly true if the correction is irrelevant to the argument’s logic or evidence. Insulting someone alongside the correction further weakens the arguer’s position, as it shows an inability to stay composed or rely on reasoned rebuttals.
Click to expand...

Ten million VN bucks says ChatGPT wrote this response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol and BernardKingGOAT
#38,671
#38,671
DinkinFlicka said:
You can't speak for people who live in a city you've only read about.

You can't claim this as "your" solution. Trump could pinch off a steaming turd in the middle of Pennsylvania Ave in the name of lowering crime and you'd agree with it. That's the problem.

DC's crime late was the lowest it had been in 30 years. Fact. Deploying the NG is not the only solution to lowering crime. Fact. There are cities with higher crime rates where he won't deploy the NG. Fact.
Click to expand...

I don't see the problem.

You can't speak for people who live in a city you've only read about.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Would that apply to you as well?

I don't see the big deal to be honest, either it will help/assist some or it won't.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top