Recruiting Forum Football Talk IX

The responses I've seen to the announcement on Facebook are pitiful. It's wild to see how people get so attached to brands.
Some companies are absolutely wizards at manipulating customers into brand loyalty. They understand psychology and pull no punches in exploiting the way our brains work. Apple and Nike both put on a masterclass. They both sell a quality product but nowhere near the pedestal that they are able to create thru marketing. I make it a point to avoid as much as possible the companies that put that much emphasis on it. Customers pay more than the value they receive.
 

How Adidas could pay Tennessee athletes for NIL​

The change from Nike to Adidas could be a divisive decision among UT fans.

During the previous partnership, there were highs like the Vols wearing Adidas football jerseys during the 1998 national title season. And there were lows like the awkward uniform designs during sub-par football seasons late in the Adidas era.

But the lucrative Adidas contract will help fund UT’s revenue sharing pool to pay athletes.

Plus, Adidas prioritizes college sports, so it could open doors to national branding campaigns for elite UT athletes with signature NIL deals. At Nike, most of those opportunities were reserved for NFL and NBA players.

That’s a new concept in the NIL era, where schools can facilitate corporate contracts for their athletes. National campaigns then feature those college athletes in ways they couldn't do in the previous era.

“Obviously, we’ll always have the big school relationship. But it’s great to use different marketing campaigns in and around campus (featuring UT athletes)” said McGuire, an Adidas executive for the past 26 years.

“Some will go national, depending on who they are. Some will be regional campaigns. And if it’s a new football jersey or basketball jersey that needs to be sold, we’ll use athletes there on campus, and they’ll be compensated."
Schach spielen, nicht Dame.
 
This is absolutely worth a listen. I made some notes.

1. Adidas will be announced within hours. Hold off gnashing teeth as you'll look silly.

2. Merk is in trouble. GMac is coming quickly and Merk should have looked a lot better in that scrimmage than he did.

3. Merk took a while to complete a pass.

4. Aguilar made the 1st 1st down, but it came due to a penalty by the defense. Defense maybe could have shut them down more and didn't have their best day.

5. GMac's camp has been alerted he needs to apply extra focus on starting this year. Getting weight on his frame etc.

6. Line and RB's looked good even against a good/great D line. 3 backs drew praise because one is banged up, but all 4 look good. Apologies missed the name of who is banged up.

7. The offense looks worse than last year at this time. The silver lining is last year's offense never really got much better maybe this one can.

8. Recievers - it's what we've all discussed, but they cited that optimistic fans tired of hearing this should consider all teams have a glaring issue they are focused on. Ours may be here and obviously QB.
Presses go brrrrrrrr

 
As @MarcoVol said, only 12 of the 25 last year ended the year ranked. Thats not predictive of anything more than us on this board creating our own top 25
So then it is predictive out of 130+ teams. It also means last year only 13 unranked teams out of ~108 made their way into the rankings. Pretty bad odds.

But I'd say it's, again, correlative. If you're 15-25, odds aren't nearly as good as if you begin top 5. It's like recruiting rankings.

If you start out in the top-5, you have a ~75% chance of ending ranked and ~55% of finishing in the top 10, which means the playoffs these days.

It means something. People aren't just throwing darts at a board of 133 teams. Now, if people want to knock for not being "predictive enough" by all means. Purely subjective. Same as recruiting rankings, draft day experts. Nobody can tell the future, but that doesn't mean it's a completely random walk either.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top