Orangeburst
Jesus-I am the light of the world. (John 8:12)
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 53,511
- Likes
- 129,378
I hope they do release the files. And if Trump is implicated I will instantly join you in demanding his immediate impeachment and removal from office and imprisonment.If he didn't do anything why not release the files ?
Theres only one, obvious answer.
I hope they do release the files. And if Trump is implicated I will instantly join you in demanding his immediate impeachment and removal from office and imprisonment.
I think you will find us in total agreement in this regard. I have zero tolerance for that regardless of party.
BTW, are you aware that an Obama appointed judge actually BLOCKED the release of the Epstein/Maxwell Grand Jury files today?
I think the Dems really don’t want the information released either. Which makes a thinking person go hmmmmm
![]()
Judge rejects Trump administration's request to unseal grand jury testimony in Ghislaine Maxwell case
A judge on Monday denied the Trump administration's motion to unseal grand jury testimony from the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell.abcnews.go.com
Its hard to know exactly what you want declared.So you’ve got……..nothing.
Slander the President (who is not just MY President but yours as well) all you want. Your contention that he exhibits guilty “behavior” would last about as long in court as a mayfield ice cream bar would last on my car’s dashboard in mid August.
And what does Trump even have to do with whether or not you can or cannot locate a single Democrat brave enough to oppose the LGBTQAEIEIO lobby. Not even ONE? Did you even try? (My bet is that you did try but couldn’t locate one since your preferred party is a literal cult).
So quit prevaricating around the shrubbery and provides an example so you can declare victory and shut me up.
I am offering you an undefended basket for a layup. Can you hit it?
I will unironically and sincerely declare you the winner if you can
There are actually multiple possible answers. I personally think TrumpIf he didn't do anything why not release the files ?
Theres only one, obvious answer.
Well, I have a school age female relative who has now been convinced the she is a male. And a very close friend (a democrat no less) recently pulled his daughter out of public school because teachers there were trying to pull exactly the same stunt.Its hard to know exactly what you want declared.
You started with Democrats grooming preschoolers to become Trans and now I'm not sure. I asked you to give me a list of any preschoolers so groomed. You can't.
I'm not into the transgender mindset, but I'm not I to pedophilia ether, which according to your metric, Republicans are. I'm not gay or Trans but live your life I'll live mine. Freedom and equality for all,even if you don't look like me or share my beliefs.
There are actually multiple possible answers. I personally think Trump
Is protecting someone other than himself. Someone who has something on him and everyone else in Washington.
Riddle me this. What frequent visitor to
Epstein Island owned the company whom made the software than ran virtually every government, corporate, and personal computer in the world for decades? Ever wonder what a gold mine of incriminating documentation such a company could accumulate. Believe me, neither party will EVER let the full Epstein files see the light of day.
Oh, as far as what I want declared, I think I have made that clear in multiple messages. All I want is the name of one single solitary nationally prominent democrat who has gone on the record opposing gender affirming care for minors.Its hard to know exactly what you want declared.
You started with Democrats grooming preschoolers to become Trans and now I'm not sure. I asked you to give me a list of any preschoolers so groomed. You can't.
I'm not into the transgender mindset, but I'm not I to pedophilia ether, which according to your metric, Republicans are. I'm not gay or Trans but live your life I'll live mine. Freedom and equality for all,even if you don't look like me or share my beliefs.
But that still doesn’t answer The question of why the democrats didn’t release it in the four years that Biden sat in the White House. Do you have a possible reason? Honest question because it stumps me.I might agree if it weren't for the fact that Trump is obsessed with his own image and if he wasn't incriminated would release it all in an instant to protect his image.
Not releasing it is simply and utterly inconsistent with any concept of actual innocence. Its just inescapable at this point that hes majorly implicated in something so bad he'd rather go through all these hoops to keep it secret.
But that still doesn’t answer The question of why the democrats didn’t release it in the four years that Biden sat in the White House. Do you have a possible reason? Honest question because it stumps me.
There are prominent Dems in there, too.
Exactly! You have hit the nail on the head. It is more than a coincidence that both parties claim they want the files released as long as they are out of power but suddenly find reasons not to as soon as they find themselves in a position to make it happen. This is one of those all too common scenarios in which neither side can claim that their excrement is not rather malodorous.There are prominent Dems in there, too.
And to emphasize my angle in the issue. Imagine that there was one person with records of everyone’s emails and browser search history who would have an incentive for the files to not be released; and that person isn’t even a politician.Let me elaborate.
We know that Clinton's ego was so massive he had an affair with a young intern in the oval office.
We know Trump views women as sex objects and has not hesitated in the past to engage in some tawdry conduct.
Wouldn't put it past either of them to have partaken in Epstein sponsored shenanigans with a 16 year old. I think everyone here would, in the end, say yup, figures.
lmao..you applauded every time Biden’s fake numbers were announced,so you should sit this one out.
There you go again..making assumptions. You are no better than Trump’s assumption.The recent controversy has educated a lot of us on how those numbers are arrived at. I don't think anybody disagrees that we need to update that system so that the fluctuations are reduced. But that doesn't mean that the last sets of numbers were politically motivated and it's just idiotic to replace the person who was running it with somebody who will definitely be partisan in their reporting.
You will clearly never shut up in defense of Epstein’s best bud.So you’ve got……..nothing.
Slander the President (who is not just MY President but yours as well) all you want. Your contention that he exhibits guilty “behavior” would last about as long in court as a mayfield ice cream bar would last on my car’s dashboard in mid August.
And what does Trump even have to do with whether or not you can or cannot locate a single Democrat brave enough to oppose the LGBTQAEIEIO lobby. Not even ONE? Did you even try? (My bet is that you did try but couldn’t locate one since your preferred party is a literal cult).
So quit prevaricating around the shrubbery and provides an example so you can declare victory and shut me up.
I am offering you an undefended basket for a layup. Can you hit it?
I will unironically and sincerely declare you the winner if you can
Kansas wheat farmers have lost their market since funding for USAID was cut. Many will loose their farms.
But it's what they voted for.
USAID bought $2 billion of American grains, Trump has made enemies of other trading partners leaving farmers with no markets.
Magas. Dumb as dirt