President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

That ignorance is shared by most Republicans. It was liberals who supported Ceasars Chavez in lifting ag wages for fruit pickers. Most growers are Republicans.
Harvesters aren't paid by the hour, but rather by production, that's why you see them moving so fast. Many make $150 +/day. Same jobs are open to anyone,no matter thier race. You or any of your friends or family can apply. Pays much better than burger King .
And every person he hired was here legally??? If not then he is breaking the law.
 
That he was involved with Epstein? There are dozens of photos and videos of him partying with Epstein. There's plenty of proof they were buddies. I have no idea whether or not Trump had sex with underage girls, but Trump absolutely knew that stuff was happening
You made sense right up until the end. My wife and I knew another married couple for years. We were around the enough that I'm sure there are photos of us with them. They were heavily involved in the church, were well respected in the community. Dude got picked up in a sting trying to meet up with a minor. I can promise you that we had absolutely no idea he was like that and judging from the reaction of his wife, she didn't have a clue either.
 
You made sense right up until the end. My wife and I knew another married couple for years. We were around the enough that I'm sure there are photos of us with them. They were heavily involved in the church, were well respected in the community. Dude got picked up in a sting trying to meet up with a minor. I can promise you that we had absolutely no idea he was like that and judging from the reaction of his wife, she didn't have a clue either.
HUge difference. Didn't Trump claim Epstein stole an employee from him that was a teenager?
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
That he was involved with Epstein? There are dozens of photos and videos of him partying with Epstein. There's plenty of proof they were buddies. I have no idea whether or not Trump had sex with underage girls, but Trump absolutely knew that stuff was happening
When did this happen? Trump threw him out of MarLarGo (because of the way he was treating an teenager) around 2000. Has not seen much of him since then.

Sounds like Hillary and Bill need to Lawyer up as they have been subpoenaed for the Epstein hearing. He said he has never been to the island and others say he had been there over 20 times. Time will tell…
 
When did this happen? Trump threw him out of MarLarGo around 2000. Has not seen much of him since then.

It is before then that is the issue.

Sounds like Hillary and Bill need to Lawyer up as they have been subpoenaed for the Epstein hearing. He said he has never been to the island and others say he had been there over 20 times. Time will tell…

If they did something wrong they should be held to account. As should Trump. Subpoenaing them by the House seems designed to turn the spotlight off of Trump and on to favorite MAGA targets. Not fooling anyone who is not in MAGA. We will see how consistent those within MAGA remain on demanding full disclosure, even if it hurts Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy’s Bandit
It is before then that is the issue.



If they did something wrong they should be held to account. As should Trump. Subpoenaing them by the House seems designed to turn the spotlight off of Trump and on to favorite MAGA targets. Not fooling anyone who is not in MAGA. We will see how consistent those within MAGA remain on demanding full disclosure, even if it hurts Trump.
Will you agree too if the current “Russia Gate” investigation proves improprieties occurred then they should be held accountable?
 
It is before then that is the issue.



If they did something wrong they should be held to account. As should Trump. Subpoenaing them by the House seems designed to turn the spotlight off of Trump and on to favorite MAGA targets. Not fooling anyone who is not in MAGA. We will see how consistent those within MAGA remain on demanding full disclosure, even if it hurts Trump.
Nothing is going to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Nothing is going to happen.


I suspect you may be right. And I think that the economy come next summer will mean more in the mid-terms than this.

But there are two wild cards. 1) the effect this will have on voter turnout when particularly social conservative MAGA voters are reminded of it over and over next year; and 2) whether a Trump victim emerges and is willing to go on record saying he engaged in bad conduct.

Right now, they'd be afraid to, and I understand that given the wrath of Trump that would surely follow such a disclosure. But as time wears on ... who knows?
 
I suspect you may be right. And I think that the economy come next summer will mean more in the mid-terms than this.

But there are two wild cards. 1) the effect this will have on voter turnout when particularly social conservative MAGA voters are reminded of it over and over next year; and 2) whether a Trump victim emerges and is willing to go on record saying he engaged in bad conduct.

Right now, they'd be afraid to, and I understand that given the wrath of Trump that would surely follow such a disclosure. But as time wears on ... who knows?
Will you agree too if the current “Russia Gate” investigation proves improprieties occurred then they should be held accountable?
 
Will you agree too if the current “Russia Gate” investigation proves improprieties occurred then they should be held accountable?


"Improprieties" is a bit vague. If someone committed a criminal offense I am sure that the Trump DOJ will prosecute them, no matter its severity. If for example there was evidence someone fabricated a document, sure, that should be prosecuted.

But if by "impropriety" you mean that someone, or someones, made a judgment based on the intelligence that 7 years later turned out to be wrong, I'd probably not agree.

In the end, we all know that this is for show and that the GOP House committee members and others will feign shock and dismay at what they say they are finding, and it won't amount to anything real. And it will cost the taxpayers $10 or $20 million to generate sound bites for Newsmax and Fox.

I personally grow weary of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
"Improprieties" is a bit vague. If someone committed a criminal offense I am sure that the Trump DOJ will prosecute them, no matter its severity. If for example there was evidence someone fabricated a document, sure, that should be prosecuted.

But if by "impropriety" you mean that someone, or someones, made a judgment based on the intelligence that 7 years later turned out to be wrong, I'd probably not agree.

In the end, we all know that this is for show and that the GOP House committee members and others will feign shock and dismay at what they say they are finding, and it won't amount to anything real. And it will cost the taxpayers $10 or $20 million to generate sound bites for Newsmax and Fox.

I personally grow weary of it.

The fact this could be the largest criminal act on our government has me wanting to get to the bottom of this . Any idea what the Russia Hoax cost our country? And the time Trump used in his first term when he could have been doing other things.

The evidence is clear Obama did not get what he wanted out of the report and had them change the narrative to indict Trump (I have provided that already) . Additionally the evidence is clear that many where in on the cover-up of this act. Time will tell….

I grew weary of the Russiagate Hoax initially. Now it’s time to spend the time to make it right. It iis that important that this never happens again.
 

VN Store



Back
Top