Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 50,541
- Likes
- 49,403
Did we have hard evidence in 2008 and 2012?
Why did Trump constantly defend Putin during his first term?![]()
Your need a rest period. Shake it off wherever you live in northeast TexasWhat hard evidence was there in 2016?
O no the scary ignorant conspiracy game. “I’m just asking questions”. “Why did Obama call the claim that Russia was an enemy 1980s foreign policy! Clearly he was compromised!”
Your second question is retarded
The witch hunt begins. I would leave the country if I were the Clinton's and the Obama's. Better to live to come back to help rebuild than die without providing meaningful resistance to trump.
If the right on the country cant see how they're being set up for failure when they've elected a felon and a rapist to be president, I have no idea what can be done make the right see the danger were all in.
The witch hunt begins. I would leave the country if I were the Clinton's and the Obama's. Better to live to come back to help rebuild than die without providing meaningful resistance to trump.
If the right on the country cant see how they're being set up for failure when they've elected a felon and a rapist to be president, I have no idea what can be done make the right see the danger were all in.
I'm not trying to justify anything. I don't care. I was only stating facts about Trump and the Senate Intelligence committee. It was a waste of time as far as I am concerned. There are are far more important matters to be dealing with than these silly investigations from both sidesOnly a retard would use that to justify an investigation into a president/presidential candidate.
I'm not trying to justify anything. I don't care. I was only stating facts about Trump and the Senate Intelligence committee. It was a waste of time as far as I am concerned. There are are far more important matters to be dealing with than these silly investigations from both sides
Ok. Your opinion, but chances are they will fack it up like they do everything elseIf the president orders the FBI to investigate the opposite party, that should 100% be investigated.
Especially given that emails between the DNC and Soros operatives seems to imply both that Hilary approved the plan and that they knew the FBI would soon “put more oil into the fire”.
That’s not a waste of time.
Good Lord. "Reminiscent of Hitler".Is it really crying wolf when it comes from Tulsi gabbard?
Do you think trump wont follow through if this Epstein stuff isn't cast aside? The taco mantle will only last so long.
Crying wolf would be more like pointing out that the current world situation seems to be a perfect inverse of wwii. With the russians frittering away their strength on Germany's east while the us seems to have elected some sort of autocrat in trump reminiscent of hitler. Germans are sort of identified with wolves and the fact that the germans seem poised to benefit at the moment and have a reputation for engineering skills, which would include social engineering the current global political moment, clearly shows that germany is finally set to fulfill its dreams of (wolfish) world domination.
I think that's the witch hunt. It's like some sort of perverse sports fan bias where the announcer is just stating happened, but because it didnt favor your team you think there must be bias involved, ie under obama the fbi was just doing its job. A wise person would recognize that trump actually is a threat to this country and that the reason everything seems to be against him is that he's undermining the country from above.You don’t believe the weaponization of the FBI under Obama against a Republican presidential candidate is worthy of investigating?
I think that's the witch hunt. It's like some sort of perverse sports fan bias where the announcer is just stating happened, but because it didnt favor your team you think there must be bias involved, ie under obama the fbi was just doing its job. A wise person would recognize that trump actually is a threat to this country and that the reason everything seems to be against him is that he's undermining the country from above.
The Dems weak immigration policies certainly had an effect. But running Kamala ultimately put him in. This country is not ready for a woman President let alone a liberal black woman (Yes I’ll go ahead and say it.)The left’s refusal to enforce border policy put him in