President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#34,127
#34,127
hog88 said:
Completely agree with you on this. Maybe (doubtful) that will be on next years agenda before the midterms.
Click to expand...
both are going to stay.

they may throw the people a carrot and act like its good thing by reducing income taxes by some token amount. or maybe they drop some underperforming tax or something. some type of theatre to say "see look we are being a benevolent government".
 
#34,128
#34,128
LouderVol said:
both are going to stay.

they may throw the people a carrot and act like its good thing by reducing income taxes by some token amount. or maybe they drop some underperforming tax or something. some type of theatre to say "see look we are being a benevolent government".
Click to expand...

No doubt. Not to mention that the tariffs will stay even when the other party eventually takes over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan and LouderVol
#34,129
#34,129
swampfoxfan said:
Trump called George Clooney a Hollywood elite.
Clooney grew up in Kentucky, sold shoes and tended bar. Bought oversize suits at goodwill cutting off the trousers to make ties so he could dress for job interviews. Now a director Clooney overseas a couple hundred employees and deals with 7 trade unions.

Trump lives in a golden tower and shi5s on a golden toilet. His company has 12 employees

Clooney says fu## you trump
Click to expand...
Where are you getting 12 employees? The number I see is over 22,000. He has more than 12 employees working just on the grounds crew at one of his golf courses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#34,132
#34,132
Grand Vol said:
SSC and I are in a slight discussion over new vehicles (the Mustang just isn't it any longer) and I'm leaning towards a truck to replace both the Stang and the Dakota...

Yeah, marked Ford, Ram and Chevy off the ****ing list up front. Between the interest rates and the absurd price, I'm going foreign this time... maybe Nissan.
Click to expand...
I love my Dark Horse.
 
#34,133
#34,133
Orangeburst said:
one would think this will lead nowhere, but seeing how Trump’s home was raided, and all the prosections he has faced, I wouldnt discount anything..new ballgame
Click to expand...
The one thing you can absolutely discount is that anything whatsoever will happen to Barack Hussein Soetoro
 
#34,136
#34,136
hog88 said:
No doubt. Not to mention that the tariffs will stay even when the other party eventually takes over.
Click to expand...
That is indeed what happened on the Trump/Biden transition. We went from “trade war trade war!” to quiet as a church mouse over inauguration night.
 
#34,138
#34,138
hog88 said:
Completely agree with you on this. Maybe (doubtful) that will be on next years agenda before the midterms.
Click to expand...
Trump has said he wants to eliminate income tax on those I der 150k...I believe he wants to use that to springboard to getting rid of all income tax..but has to do incrementally in order to create pressure from the upper class to eliminate it since they would still be paying...downside is the impact on productivity..it'll drop as people tru to stay below the threshold of 150k.
 
#34,139
#34,139
hog88 said:
The same place he gets most of his information.
Click to expand...
A guy here that is super against the Google datacenter coming in (for "environmental" reasons) told me the center would use 8 million gallons of water each and every day, or about 3 billion gallons a year, which is like a quarter of one of the local reservoirs.

I asked him where that number came from, he gave some garbled garbage about local news. A 30-second search online shows that Google's largest US datacenter (maybe in the world) uses 2.6 million gallons a year, and all of their datacenter assets combined use 6 billion. So I'm supposed to believe that Google is going to have a single, relatively normal rural-Virginia datacenter add 3 billion gallons of water expenses (+50%) to their portfolio.

Totally making up numbers is par for the course for a certain subset of whiners in this country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and hog88
#34,141
#34,141
whodeycin85 said:
Trump has said he wants to eliminate income tax on those I der 150k...I believe he wants to use that to springboard to getting rid of all income tax..but has to do incrementally in order to create pressure from the upper class to eliminate it since they would still be paying...downside is the impact on productivity..it'll drop as people tru to stay below the threshold of 150k.
Click to expand...
If you make $170, you wouldn't be paying on the entire amount. I highly doubt anyone around that income is going to stop working so as to avoid a $4500 tax bill
 
#34,145
#34,145
swampfoxfan said:
Are you sure the evidence exists and is it credible?

Would the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity not shield Obama?
Click to expand...
Initial thought is that it would. His legacy will be demolished if this is found to be true. Others, Clapper, Brennon Comey and others had better be “lawyering up”. If you read everything Tulsi has released, it certainly is compelling. Additionally, whistleblowers (wanting immunity) are coming out.

Russiagate was proven to be a lie.

My question is, who manufactured it?

Evidence is certainly point directly to Obama.
 
#34,149
#34,149
Buddy’s Bandit said:
Initial thought is that it would. His legacy will be demolished if this is found to be true. Others, Clapper, Brennon Comey and others had better be “lawyering up”. If you read everything Tulsi has released, it certainly is compelling. Additionally, whistleblowers (wanting immunity) are coming out.

Russiagate was proven to be a lie.

My question is, who manufactured it?

Evidence is certainly point directly to Obama.
Click to expand...
If Russiagate was a lie, and I don't believe it was proven, then certainly Obama would be responsible. He May not have been aware of it being false, yet it happened under his watch.
I agree others should be layering up, and if they start doing so now, that's the evidence I need to believe the vlai.s true.

Hope it gets cleared up. It's time for all Americans to work together. I think you agree with that
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top