Iran

#5,277
#5,277
NashVol11 said:
Well you just implied that your degree wouldn't give you the ability to delete the part of the tweet where Loomer is kissing Trump's ass (or to attribute it to her initially), so I would stop digging if I were you lol
Click to expand...
You’re struggling with this. Sorry my guy, no need to edit someone else’s words. No need to manipulate it because you got busted and having to fight your way out of embarrassment. There you go again with lol and no punctuation.
 
#5,278
#5,278
Majors said:
You’re struggling with this. Sorry my guy, no need to edit someone else’s words. No need to manipulate it because you got busted and having to fight your way out of embarrassment. There you go again with lol and no punctuation.
Click to expand...
You can say this all you want, but you tried to pass someone else's words off as your own, and then when I pointed out that some of those words were embarrassing for a grown man, you magically found the ability to attribute them to the person who actually said them lol
 
#5,279
#5,279
NashVol11 said:
To be clear, this sarcastic attitude is one you're taking toward our own intel. You saying "right" to our intelligence operatives? You think they're stupid and got it wrong because a VN poster knows better?
Click to expand...

Has 0 to do with intel. They’ve openly admitted to 60% enriched uranium
 
#5,282
#5,282
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
No country has ever used a nuclear bomb unprovoked except us in the 80 or so years nukes have been in existence. Why would Iran suddenly buck the trend? Nations get nukes for defensive posture. It's to deter others from attacking you with nukes.

What evidence do you have Iran would use a nuclear bomb unprovoked outside of your bigotry towards them?
Click to expand...
Unprovoked? 🤦🏼‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: turdherder11, NorthDallas40 and volfanhill
#5,283
#5,283
lawgator1 said:
We haven't even seen such an attack and you are prepping for the blame shifting already. Pretty transparent.
Click to expand...

Puuuuuleeese. If there are terrorist attacks within the US Biden, his sycophants, his handlers and supporters own it.
 
#5,284
#5,284
Vol8188 said:
Has 0 to do with intel. They’ve openly admitted to 60% enriched uranium
Click to expand...
And you think our intelligence operatives didn't know that when they determined that Iran is not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon? They actually are, because you know better?
 
#5,285
#5,285
NashVol11 said:
You can say this all you want, but you tried to pass someone else's words off as your own, and then when I pointed out that some of those words were embarrassing for a grown man, you magically found the ability to attribute them to the person who actually said them lol
Click to expand...
No not really but nice try tough. Thats why I posted it ole boy. Post the full quote as a copy or a tweet that’s cut off. But you did get backed down and called out for your assumption and bad use of a** kissing.

Go put you nose in the corner.
 
#5,286
#5,286
NashVol11 said:
And you think our intelligence operatives didn't know that when they determined that Iran is not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon? They actually are, because you know better?
Click to expand...

So the only country on the planet with 60% enriched uranium and you believe they’re doing it for fun?

I’m not saying I know better. What I’m saying is the intelligence report is simply saying they’ve not officially made the move yet.

But there’s no valid reason to put billions of dollars into enriching uranium to that degree other than to produce nuclear weapons.

Can you give me any?
 
#5,287
#5,287
Majors said:
No not really but nice try tough. Thats why I posted it ole boy. Post the full quote as a copy or a tweet that’s cut off. But you did get backed down and called out for your assumption and bad use of a** kissing.
Click to expand...
Huh? All you did was immediately go "that embarrassing ass kissing wasn't actually me" followed by deflecting to grammar lol. Enjoy your alternate reality, see you next time you invent a phrase like "out of the shoot" and are dumb enough to spend several posts arguing that it's correct
 
#5,288
#5,288
NashVol11 said:
Huh? All you did was immediately go "that embarrassing ass kissing wasn't actually me" followed by deflecting to grammar lol. Enjoy your alternate reality, see you next time you invent a phrase like "out of the shoot" and are dumb enough to spend several posts arguing that it's correct (period goes here)
Click to expand...
It wasn’t. But it’s awesome that you believed it was and got corrected and has been struggling since. Still missing a period.
 
#5,290
#5,290


Just ran to the store and this was on the radio when I jumped in the car LMAO.

Still hear this hook half the time when I read the thread title. Coincidence? I think not....
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh
#5,294
#5,294
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
Iran isn't Arab by the way.
Click to expand...
Correct. Persians are not arab.
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
And if you think we aren't the cause, then what started this beef with Iran?
Click to expand...
I'd say the present beef is a continuation of hostilities that's been going on since at least the late 70's.

To narrow it down to this weeks bombings specifically, I'd say it's primarily due to Iran's unwillingness to come to terms on a nuclear deal combined with the IAEA reporting and Iran's admittance of being close to weaponizing their nuclear capabilities. *

*I've recently become aware I may have been brainwashed by an Israeli/neo-con pysop that's causing me to believe the IAEA and take threats serious from a terrorist regime.
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
What happened before us and the British installed the Shah that made Iran worthy of regime change.
Click to expand...
The USSR under Stalin occupied Iran until western pressure (primarily the U.S.) forced them to withdraw in 46.

Did the regime change or did we re-empower the Shah?
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
What did they do to us that was so bad we had to topple their secular democratically elected government to install a dictator?
Click to expand...
Of course I can't claim we were morally in the right in 53. I can claim they ended up with a better deal due to our involvement than they would have had we let Britain handle it alone. Britain was giving them the sh!t end of the stick, but trying to nationalize the oil industry wasn't tenable.

I'm assuming 53 is what you mean by installing a dictator. A dictator that pretty much operated within the constraints of the same secular democratically elected government and constitution they'd had since the early 1906.

Clearly, it's all our fault Iran was taken over by radical Islamic fundamentalists 25 years later. Iran's hostilities since 1978 are due to our actions during the post WW2 years. Iran's hostilities over the next 40 years will be due our actions this weekend.
 
#5,295
#5,295
volfanhill said:
We are so stupid

Click to expand...

I'm not sure why this matters. The point of an attack shouldn't have been destroying the uranium. If that was the goal, massive bombings were a terrible way to go about it.

The point was(and maybe this is giving Trump and Co too much credit) to keep Iran from any further refinement. If the mullahs have a bunch of uranium with no refinement capacity, then they might as well have no uranium.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, Volsdeep4 and Vol8188
#5,298
#5,298
NashVol11 said:
Alright. I can probably agree they "don't follow through" whatever that means, but I haven't seen LGBTQ treatment used from the left as a justification for bombing other countries
Click to expand...
Ya, they side with the people who outlaw homosexuality and execute the homosexuals.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top