President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

1000005352.png

giphy.gif
 
i would focus on anyone who has broken our lies or laws in another country, gang/terrorist affiliated, anyone with a previous deportation order, and anyone that is receiving taxpayer funded living/food.
If they have brown skin, white s Africans are ok to live of the taxpayer tit
 
Are we at the find out stage yet? All Republicans can do is break the economy and give their buddies tax breaks. That's it. Then a Dem has to come in and fix it, just so Republicans can b!tch and whine (while sailing on their yacht) that their taxes are too high and they're being robbed blind by migrants (that they're likely paying off the books at $4/hour).


You slurped and posted fake jobs numbers that the prior administration put out for months on end.

Do we think these are real, or should we wait for the “revision” that always followed the last guy’s?
 

BREAKING NEWS: Trump signs bombshell Travel Ban restricting people from 19 countries from entering the US​

President Donald Trump has banned visitors from 12 countries from entering the United States and partially restricted travelers from seven other nations.

The move is the latest in Trump's efforts to secure America's borders after a Colorado terror attack in which an Egyptian national who overstayed his visa allegedly set people alight at a pro-Israel demonstration.

Nationals of Afghanistan, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be barred from entering the United States under the new proclamation.

Further to that ban, citizens of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted from traveling.

Mohamed Soliman, who had overstayed his visa and was residing in the US illegally, is now in custody accused of firebombing a group as they gathered to honor the hostages still trapped in Gaza by Hamas militants.

During his first term in office, Trump announced a ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TrumpedUpVol
No; but the democrats seem pathologically drawn to the immigrants who are 😂
They keep choosing the absolute worst possible cases to highlight.
Worst cases? Oh you mean health care for seniors, food for infants and equality of all ethnicities. And don't leave out education.
 
If my wife was being deported, my kids and I would be going with her.

You have the perspective of a privileged person, and you don't understand what it's like to be in their shoes. Throughout history, people on the bottom have separated their families for opportunity. I imagine you think your kids should go through hard things for their greater good. You think maybe if you were from a 3rd world country, you would rather have your kids remain in the US as citizens? They are Americans. They don't know Mexico. It's not that easy to just say, "oh yeah, we're all going with Mom because being together is the only thing that matters."

People who can't swim will risk their lives to cross a river to get here illegally, and you and I know nothing about that life.
 
Last edited:

Took a look at Wal-Marts earnings release and yeah, I believe that your post has merit. Too early to form an opinion on one number in time but I wouldn't be shocked if you see revisions or smoothing.

In short, Wal Marts actual inflation for GAAP purposes was greater than CPI they used for tax purposes. Either Wal Mart forgot how to purchase product (highly unlikely) or the CPI has some issues with it.

The only other time in history they had this phenomenon was when the Biden admin was blatantly reporting erroneous crap inflation figures in 21-22...
 
I'm really looking forward to the FOI requests for these essay question answers.

Typical of most liberal news rags, the title of that story, "New federal employees must now write essays praising Trump's policies", is a lie. Reading through the list of essay questions, not a single one of them requires applicants to praise Trump's policies. They ask applicants to explain how they would support and advance the administration's policy priorities if hired for the position.

Imagine that! The Trump administration has the nerve to institute hiring policies to try to weed out backstabbing liberals that would do nothing but attempt to undermine the administration's goals.

From the Article:

The essay questions are as follows:

1. How has your commitment to the Constitution and the founding principles of the United States inspired you to pursue this role within the Federal government? Provide a concrete example from professional, academic, or personal experience.

2. In this role, how would you use your skills and experience to improve government efficiency and effectiveness? Provide specific examples where you improved processes, reduced costs, or improved outcomes.

3. How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.

4. How has a strong work ethic contributed to your professional, academic or personal achievements? Provide one or two specific examples, and explain how those qualities would enable you to serve effectively in this position.

The plan, as outlined in the memo, would also decrease hiring time for new candidates to under 80 days; implement a skills-based hiring approach that would reduce the need for "unnecessary degree requirements"; and end the use of diversity, equity and inclusion programs in hiring and recruitment, which the memo described as "racial discrimination."
 
Last edited:
Typical of most liberal news rags, the title of that story, "New federal employees must now write essays praising Trump's policies" is a lie. Reading through the list of essay questions, not a single one of them requires applicants to praise Trump's policies. They ask applicants to explain how they would support and advance the administration's policy priorities if hired for the position.

Imagine that! The Trump administration has the nerve to institute hiring policies to try to weed out backstabbing liberals that would do nothing but attempt to undermine the administration's goals.

From the Article:

The essay questions are as follows:

1. How has your commitment to the Constitution and the founding principles of the United States inspired you to pursue this role within the Federal government? Provide a concrete example from professional, academic, or personal experience.

2. In this role, how would you use your skills and experience to improve government efficiency and effectiveness? Provide specific examples where you improved processes, reduced costs, or improved outcomes.

3. How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.

4. How has a strong work ethic contributed to your professional, academic or personal achievements? Provide one or two specific examples, and explain how those qualities would enable you to serve effectively in this position.

The plan, as outlined in the memo, would also decrease hiring time for new candidates to under 80 days; implement a skills-based hiring approach that would reduce the need for "unnecessary degree requirements"; and end the use of diversity, equity and inclusion programs in hiring and recruitment, which the memo described as "racial discrimination."
Trump fails question one.
 
Typical of most liberal news rags, the Title of that story, "New federal employees must now write essays praising Trump's policies" is a lie. Reading through the list of essay questions, not a single one of them requires applicants to praise Trump's policies. They ask applicants to explain how they would support and advance the administration's policy priorities if hired for the position.

Imagine that! The Trump administration has the nerve to institute hiring policies to try to weed out backstabbing liberals that would do nothing but attempt to undermine the administration's goals.
Lol, you didn't actually read it, did you?

1000005353.png

So you need to identify which EOs are personally significant for you, and how you will help implement those EOs.

I really hope someone compiles all of these into a monument of sycophancy.
 
Lol, you didn't actually read it, did you?

View attachment 746569

So you need to identify which EOs are personally significant for you, and how you will help implement those EOs.

I really hope someone compiles all of these into a monument of sycophancy.
Obviously you have no reading comprehension skills. Nowhere does that say anything about praising Trump’s policies. An EO could be “significant” to somebody for many reasons. In your case, they’re all significant to you because you have TDS, and you despise them all. In order to land a job in the Trump administration, though, you’d have to explain how you will help implement those policies. As I said before, the administration has the nerve to institute hiring policies to try to weed out backstabbing liberals that would do nothing but attempt to undermine the administration's goals. What a radical concept!
 
OK, I played.

I assume you mean LBGQT community.

If any group is breaking the law by using vengeance against our community, then I have no problem with them being locked up (spite?).

Is this what you are referencing? Be forthright …..
Be forthright? Are you a kindergarten teacher?
Read my post again. It's not about alphabet people. It's about Trump's mindset.
 
Last edited:
Yep the US started doing just that...
Ended USAID

It had been such a huge success in the almost 70 years it’s existed. Definitely not wasteful and full of fraud at all. Those trannie comic books, dei programs, feeding al-quaeda, etc were all definitely detrimental to helping develop sh**hole countries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33
It had been such a huge success in the almost 70 years it’s existed. Definitely not wasteful and full of fraud at all. Those trannie comic books, dei programs, feeding al-quaeda, etc were all definitely detrimental to helping develop sh**hole countries.
The bad's been a small part of the whole. USAID's been a tool for a tremendous amount of good through the years. Shutting it down is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
Advertisement

Back
Top