1982 team was probably better than the overall record. It was a fun team to watch, that was the beginning stages of a good run in the 80’s. 86 was a bit of a let down coming off the 85 success, and in 88 we were very young and lost our first 6 before winning the last 5. That set the tone for 89 where we went 11-1. The 85 and 89 squads were capable of beating everybody. GBO
The 1985 team was the best team in the country at the end of the season, hands down. If there had been a playoff, they would have won it. And if the schedule, which was a bear, had not been front-loaded, they would have anyway.
The defense was too soft and wore down in that first game against UCLA, which won the Pac-10 that year. They let UCLA score 16 points at the end and tie it, and then a couple of weeks later, they nearly did it again against Wake Forest, but after that they were lights-out. Florida beat us in Gainesville by a TD with the best team money could buy, but I think we'd have handled them anywhere late in the season.
Johnny wouldn't let Daryl Dickey play against a really good Georgia Tech team until it was almost too late, but Carlos Reveiz made a couple of long field goals and salvaged a tie. Then the D got even better. That was a better Tennessee defense than 1998 was. And we eventually won the SEC title outright because Ray Perkins played for a tie against LSU and took them both out of the running.
That is the one Tennessee team other than '98 in my lifetime that I think could have won it all under modern rules. The 1989 team only played one game like a national title contender, on the day they beat Auburn. I don't even want to think about what Nebraska would have done to us in '95; I'll happily take that #3 finish.