President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#25,677
#25,677
marcusluvsvols said:
Yep. For the 1st time in modern history most Americans support the president and the direction the country is headed...so of course the dirtbag Liberal judges are conspiring to block as many of his actions as possible. Of course the Liberal media, which makes up the overwhelming majority of broadcast media (ABC, NBC. CBS, CNN, MSNBC, PBS, etc) oppose everything he says or does...despite the fact that their ratings are absolute garbage because the majority of Americans do not share their views. Of course the Dimwit Party has chosen to double down on their extremely unpopular ideas such as identitiy politics, trans nonsense, anti-gun rhetoric, boys in girls sports.

Makes perfect sense. Their Liberal "platform" if you can even call a lack of ideas or strategy a platform, was soundly rejected in November in the executive branch AND both houses of Congress...the majority of American people clearly support the opposite of their positions...so just keep parroting the same stupid lies and nonsense. The only REAL pushback most folks have on the current administration is that they havent deported ENOUGH people yet. They havent cut ENOUGH of the programs and theft that DOGE has revealed (which is on Congress, not Trump but people are ignorant) They havent cancelled ENOUGH of the DEI nonsense and trans related bullcrap. They havent undone ENOUGH of the damage that the Biden/Obama administrations did to this country.

How low do ratings have to go before TV idiots change their positions? How many Democrats have to lose elections before the party realizes they have been kidnapped by the Marxist and Globalist ideas that people in the US reject? How much failure and embarrassment will the remaining Dimwit voters accept before they demand change? People left that party in droves during the Biden administration because all he did was humiliate this country.

I hope the Leftist idiots continue to double down on the same stupid ideas. They will continue to lose elections and maybe, just maybe, we can have sane leadership instead of Tranny story hour in kindergarten at public schools. Absolutely ridiculous.
Click to expand...
You're really hung up on the tyranny stuff, stepping out of the closet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#25,678
#25,678
marcusluvsvols said:
Yep. For the 1st time in modern history most Americans support the president and the direction the country is headed.
Click to expand...
But of course, that is not true, unless you are only looking at cherry-picked, Republican-leaning pollsters such as Rasmussen Reports and Trafalgar/Insider Advantage. Here are the Real Clear Polling Averages, concerning Donald Trump's Job Approval Ratings, and the Direction of the Country :


Even when you include the 2 biased Republican-leaning Polling outliers, Rasmussen Reports and Trafalgar/Insider Advantage, Donald Trump's Real Clear Polling Average Job Approval Rating is at :

Approval ................ 47.8%
Disapproval ........... 49.7%

Spread ................... -1.9%


As for the Direction of the Country, Donald Trump's Real Clear Polling Averages are :

Right Direction ...... 43.7%
Wrong Direction .... 50.7%

Spread .................. -7.0%

marcusluvsvols said:
so of course the dirtbag Liberal judges are conspiring to block as many of his actions as possible.
Click to expand...
If you are talking about the 3 judge panel, who blocked the implementation of the Trump Administration's tariffs. They are comprised of:

1) Judge Jane Restani ........... Appointed by President Ronald Reagan
2) Judge Gary Katzmann ......... Appointed by President Barack Obama
3) Judge Timothy Reif ........... Appointed by President Donald Trump
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan, LouderVol and EasternVol
#25,679
#25,679
BowlBrother85 said:
That 3 judge panel is comprised of :

1) Judge Jane Restani - appointed by President Ronald Reagan

2) Judge Gary Katzmann - appointed by President Barack Obama

3) Judge Timothy Reif - appointed by President Donald Trump

Their vote was 3-0 to block the tariffs from being imposed.
Click to expand...
Point?

Appealed.

Overruled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#25,680
#25,680
Many of the Dems on here laughed at the notion that the FBI was involved in J6. Buckle up, looks like the truth is forthcoming.

"People have had questions about January 6th and whether or not there were FBI sources – not agents, sources – on the ground during January 6. And I told you I would get you the definitive answer to that. And we have, and we are in the process again of working with our partners to divulge that information, and it is coming," Patel said during a "Special Report" exclusive interview Wednesday.

Patel added the answer may "surprise and shock people because of what past FBI leaders have said about it."

Full Story: FBI's Kash Patel vows 'definitive answer' on top Jan 6 question is 'coming'
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
#25,681
#25,681
BowlBrother85 said:
But of course, that is not true, unless you are only looking at cherry-picked, Republican-leaning pollsters such as Rasmussen Reports and Trafalgar/Insider Advantage. Here are the Real Clear Polling Averages, concerning Donald Trump's Job Approval Ratings, and the Direction of the Country :


Even when you include the 2 biased Republican-leaning Polling outliers, Rasmussen Reports and Trafalgar/Insider Advantage, Donald Trump's Real Clear Polling Average Job Approval Rating is at :

Approval ................ 47.8%
Disapproval ........... 49.7%

Spread ................... -1.9%


As for the Direction of the Country, Donald Trump's Real Clear Polling Averages are :

Right Direction ...... 43.7%
Wrong Direction .... 50.7%

Spread .................. -7.0%


If you are talking about the 3 judge panel, who blocked the implementation of the Trump Administration's tariffs. They are comprised of:

1) Judge Jane Restani ........... Appointed by President Ronald Reagan
2) Judge Gary Katzmann ......... Appointed by President Barack Obama
3) Judge Timothy Reif ........... Appointed by President Donald Trump
Click to expand...
You just gonna ignore the extreme left leaning poll at -10 and -11. 3x more then margin of error...think that will slow the. Numbers. Bit vs 1 fighting leaning +10... Not mention the other one at -8 2x the margin..at least produce the I do for both side and stop be fundamentally dishonest about the polls.
 
#25,682
#25,682
whodeycin85 said:
Got proof of that claim?
Click to expand...
Yep. The White House was quick to say it wasn't..which means it was. The Trump White House is full of pure fickle stupidity and anyone with an iota of critical thinking ability can see it for what it is.

www.eonline.com

Was Barron Trump Rejected From Harvard? The White House Says…

Melania Trump’s team addressed rumors that her and Donald Trump’s son Barron Trump was rejected from Harvard, hours after the president moved to cut federal funding for the Ivy League school.
www.eonline.com www.eonline.com
 
#25,683
#25,683
BowlBrother85 said:
But of course, that is not true, unless you are only looking at cherry-picked, Republican-leaning pollsters such as Rasmussen Reports and Trafalgar/Insider Advantage. Here are the Real Clear Polling Averages, concerning Donald Trump's Job Approval Ratings, and the Direction of the Country :


Even when you include the 2 biased Republican-leaning Polling outliers, Rasmussen Reports and Trafalgar/Insider Advantage, Donald Trump's Real Clear Polling Average Job Approval Rating is at :

Approval ................ 47.8%
Disapproval ........... 49.7%

Spread ................... -1.9%


As for the Direction of the Country, Donald Trump's Real Clear Polling Averages are :

Right Direction ...... 43.7%
Wrong Direction .... 50.7%

Spread .................. -7.0%


If you are talking about the 3 judge panel, who blocked the implementation of the Trump Administration's tariffs. They are comprised of:

1) Judge Jane Restani ........... Appointed by President Ronald Reagan
2) Judge Gary Katzmann ......... Appointed by President Barack Obama
3) Judge Timothy Reif ........... Appointed by President Donald Trump
Click to expand...
Right. The main stream media polls have proved to be deadly accurate about the public’s perception about Trump. 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, StarRaider and TrumpedUpVol
#25,688
#25,688
FLVOL_79 said:
Yep. The White House was quick to say it wasn't..which means it was. The Trump White House is full of pure fickle stupidity and anyone with an iota of critical thinking ability can see it for what it is.

www.eonline.com

Was Barron Trump Rejected From Harvard? The White House Says…

Melania Trump’s team addressed rumors that her and Donald Trump’s son Barron Trump was rejected from Harvard, hours after the president moved to cut federal funding for the Ivy League school.
www.eonline.com www.eonline.com
Click to expand...
So your proof is that the people whom are said to have applied..said he did not....and Harvard whom can verify it has not responded...ever considered that Harvard hasn't responded because he didn't apply.

Logically if Harvard could prove that he applied, it's a basis to challenge what Trump is doing to them...they would have disclose anything other then he applied...that would be more proof then what you have..with a. Iota of critical thinking.
 
#25,689
#25,689
Orange_Crush said:
I haven't moved anything. I responded to this objective statement:


With, "Why?".

At which point you began telling me what "they" "will" do. (Hell, go reread. My first several posts were basically nothing but clarifying questions.)




It turns out your argument is strung together with category errors, slippery slope fallacies, personal incredulity (apparently as explanation of what "they will do").

Sprinkle in some assumptions that if (God forbid) "they" could legally imprison US citizens in foreign prisons, they couldn't/wouldn't negotiate a treaty of capabilities for the US gov't, which was a helluva red herring anyway, since the original quota was given strictly to immigration officials, and not the DoJ, who would be the ones dealing with citizen/prison. (That's another category error you've made--i.e. that immigration's capabilities per an El Salvadoran citizen in El Salvador will the same as a US citizen in El Salvador, likely with signed treaties per the US DoJ calling the shots in that business transaction.)

But to answer your objection, I freely admit they COULD attempt to do any of that, which is a FAR CRY from you telling us what they WILL do.
Click to expand...
you find it strange that my belief in quotas are bad is filled with my personal incredulity? How doesn't that make any sense to you? Its internally consistent. I have personal beliefs for thinking its bad, so I said its bad.

I started with the explanation of how quotas themselves are bad, so did several other people. but you kept asking questions that got further and further away from those points.

and again for some reason you just want to dismiss this country's history of being chitty to its citizens as "category errors" because this specific issue hasn't happened. you are the one making a bigger leap than I am with your faith in the government to do the right thing.
 
#25,690
#25,690
BeardedVol said:
Don't you know? Literally, anyone convicted of a crime, between 1/20/2021 and 1/20/2025 was railroaded, and is in fact innocent of all charges.
Click to expand...
Biden made everything not a (punishable) crime for a bunch of people for much longer than '21 to '25. but sure keep believing Trump is the problem.
 
#25,691
#25,691
LouderVol said:
you find it strange that my belief in quotas are bad is filled with my personal incredulity? How doesn't that make any sense to you? Its internally consistent. I have personal beliefs for thinking its bad, so I said its bad.

I started with the explanation of how quotas themselves are bad, so did several other people. but you kept asking questions that got further and further away from those points.

and again for some reason you just want to dismiss this country's history of being chitty to its citizens as "category errors" because this specific issue hasn't happened. you are the one making a bigger leap than I am with your faith in the government to do the right thing.
Click to expand...
If you say so.
 
#25,692
#25,692
whodeycin85 said:
So your proof is that the people whom are said to have applied..said he did not....and Harvard whom can verify it has not responded...ever considered that Harvard hasn't responded because he didn't apply.

Logically if Harvard could prove that he applied, it's a basis to challenge what Trump is doing to them...they would have disclose anything other then he applied...that would be more proof then what you have..with a. Iota of critical thinking.
Click to expand...
Lot of mental gymnastics here. Trump does not do ANYTHING unless he feels someone has wronged him or he has a grift/angle to work. Feel free to take a look at his EO's targeting law firms who went after him or that he felt went after him. That's all the proof you need to know the dudes a petty little b!tch and will lash out at anyone he feels wronged him. Presidential Actions Archives

So when the White House has to issue a statement on "rumors" (its a legal angle they are working to justify some action, in this case going after Harvard) you should immediately know they are FOS. This is no different than the Biden White House downplaying his mental health. In fact, its exactly the same propaganda op.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85 and swampfoxfan
#25,694
#25,694
BeardedVol said:
Don't you know? Literally, anyone convicted of a crime, between 1/20/2021 and 1/20/2025 was railroaded, and is in fact innocent of all charges.
Click to expand...
Especially if they committed any kind of fraud. Glad Trump is out there pardoning those white collar crimes!
 
#25,695
#25,695
Buddy’s Bandit said:
Many of the Dems on here laughed at the notion that the FBI was involved in J6. Buckle up, looks like the truth is forthcoming.

"People have had questions about January 6th and whether or not there were FBI sources – not agents, sources – on the ground during January 6. And I told you I would get you the definitive answer to that. And we have, and we are in the process again of working with our partners to divulge that information, and it is coming," Patel said during a "Special Report" exclusive interview Wednesday.

Patel added the answer may "surprise and shock people because of what past FBI leaders have said about it."

Full Story: FBI's Kash Patel vows 'definitive answer' on top Jan 6 question is 'coming'
Click to expand...
sounds like the system is going to be covering itself again. working with what partners? if it was an FBI issue, why does the FBI need to coordinate with anyone about divulging information?
 
#25,696
#25,696
Orange_Crush said:
If you say so.
Click to expand...

Quotas wouldn't make sense if the supply did not exist i.e. manufacturing supply. In this case, supply exists in huge amounts 30-60m. Nobody has to create supply. If there is a bottleneck in the process, than more people, resources or additional processes may be needed.

They're going to have to get up to 10,000-20,000 a day deportations by increasing the whole pipeline, I would expect to see more privatization. If 50m are ejected than the amount of deportations would have to decrease at some point but that is 10+ years out.... if ever.
 
#25,698
#25,698
Buddy’s Bandit said:
Many of the Dems on here laughed at the notion that the FBI was involved in J6. Buckle up, looks like the truth is forthcoming.

"People have had questions about January 6th and whether or not there were FBI sources – not agents, sources – on the ground during January 6. And I told you I would get you the definitive answer to that. And we have, and we are in the process again of working with our partners to divulge that information, and it is coming," Patel said during a "Special Report" exclusive interview Wednesday.

Patel added the answer may "surprise and shock people because of what past FBI leaders have said about it."

Full Story: FBI's Kash Patel vows 'definitive answer' on top Jan 6 question is 'coming'
Click to expand...
Agent provocateurs is what you are probably thinking about. 100% chance they had them on the ground.

That being said this is probably just like every other "bombshell" report previous administrations have dropped in the past few decades, aka nothingburgers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and LouderVol
#25,700
#25,700
Vol737 said:
I would have been surprised if Harvard hadn’t rejected him, only because of who he is.
Click to expand...
Seems Trump wants to be part of a certain elite crowd that he has never been able to infiltrate because of who he is and his background. And being unable to break into that inner circle, even as the most powerful person in the world, really grinds his gears. Guess money can't buy everything..
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top