President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#25,276
#25,276
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Click to expand...

I actually both like and respect Trey Gowdy. He was a great prosecutor in South Carolina. Practically a legend. If you have ever watched shows such as "Forensic Files," then you have probably seen cases involving him. He is a highly skilled and thorough investigator. He would have been a great choice for Attorney General in a Republican Party Administration. Unfortunately, it appears that Matt Gaetz received stronger consideration than Gowdy did for AG. That's Donald Trump for you

However, he is making incendiary rhetoric a partisan issue here, and it shouldn't be.


www.pbs.org

How some members of the Republican Party have normalized the use of violent rhetoric

The Jan. 6 panel recently presented new evidence on how former President Trump stoked violence leading up to the Capitol insurrection. But the escalation and normalization of violent rhetoric has extended beyond Trump, becoming a dangerous feature of Republican campaigns and party messaging...
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org


Many Republicans, as well as some posters on here, insisted that Donald Trump's post-2020 Presidential Election rhetoric was not in any way responsible for the riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, because words alone do not incite rational-thinking people to violence. Since the assassination attempts on Trump were made last summer, Republicans, as well as those posters here, have changed their tune on that belief .... but you can't have it both ways. If Democrats/liberals are capable of inciting violence with rhetoric, than so are Republins/conservatives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#25,278
#25,278
BowlBrother85 said:
Oh dear. An anonymous and politically tribal poster on a sub-forum of a college sports team's website.
Click to expand...
The point being that we've been seeing district judge overreach getting overturned left and right. Appeals to authority are a logical fallacy. Your self-description doesn't change that.
 
#25,279
#25,279
Orange_Crush said:
The point being that we've been seeing district judge overreach getting overturned left and right. Appeals to authority are a logical fallacy. Your self-description doesn't change that.
Click to expand...
Your complete lack of self-awareness doesn't change a damn thing either. If you think that you are less biased than a district judge or more qualified to interpret the United States Constitution than a district judge .... then you are every bit as delusional as I would have guessed.
 
#25,280
#25,280
BowlBrother85 said:
Your complete lack of self-awareness doesn't change a damn thing either. If you think that you are less biased than a district judge or more qualified to interpret the United States Constitution than a district judge .... then you are every bit as delusional as I would have guessed.
Click to expand...
Speaking of delusions... You seem to have made some things up. I never claimed any such thing, thus I haven't offered an opinion one way or the other.

Do better. It'll be for your own good.
 
#25,281
#25,281
Orange_Crush said:
Speaking of delusions... You seem to have made some things up. I never claimed any such thing, thus I haven't offered an opinion one way or the other.

Do better. It'll be for your own good.
Click to expand...
Take note of the words "If you think," in that post you just quoted.

Develop some better reading comprehension skills. It'll be for your own good. It's obviously a problem area for you.
 
#25,282
#25,282
BowlBrother85 said:
Take note of the words "If you think," in that post you just quoted.

Develop some better reading comprehension skills. It'll be for your own good. It's obviously a problem area for you.
Click to expand...
That's beyond weak and is basically a cowardly, intellectually dishonest reframe of the point you thought you'd made.

Like I said. Do better. It's for your own good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#25,283
#25,283
Orange_Crush said:
That's beyond weak and is basically a cowardly, intellectually dishonest reframe of the point you thought you'd made.

Like I said. Do better. It's for your own good.
Click to expand...
So, your reading comprehension skills suck, but that's okay, because you compensate for this shortcoming, with the power to read minds over an internet message board forum?

That might make sense to .... somebody.
 
#25,284
#25,284
BowlBrother85 said:
So, your reading comprehension skills suck, but that's okay, because you compensate for this shortcoming, with the power to read minds over an internet message board forum?

That might make sense to .... somebody.
Click to expand...
No. Actually, it's reading comprehension and a long history of watching you write checks and retreat with Luther-like form. Your assumptions were wrapped up in accusing me of a lack of self-awareness. You continued to follow from there. Trying to parse it in the way you are merely shows you to be behaving in an intellectually dishonest manner.

Stop making it worse. Do better. It's for your own good. Begin operating in good faith so that we can start taking you slightly more seriously than we currently do.
 
#25,287
#25,287
Orange_Crush said:
No. Actually, it's reading comprehension and a long history of watching you write checks and retreat with Luther-like form. Your assumptions were wrapped up in accusing me of a lack of self-awareness. You continued to follow from there. Trying to parse it in the way you are merely shows you to be behaving in an intellectually dishonest manner.

Stop making it worse. Do better. It's for your own good. Begin operating in good faith so that we can start taking you slightly more seriously than we currently do.
Click to expand...
You would be doing yourself some good, if you developed a capacity for self-awareness and learned how to read. Too much time is likely being spent with your hero-worship of Donald Trump.
 
#25,290
#25,290
BowlBrother85 said:
Your complete lack of self-awareness doesn't change a damn thing either. If you think that you are less biased than a district judge or more qualified to interpret the United States Constitution than a district judge .... then you are every bit as delusional as I would have guessed.
Click to expand...
lmao
 
#25,295
#25,295
#25,296
#25,296
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill and BowlBrother85
#25,297
#25,297
volbeast33 said:
Both Trump and the democrats were being idiots. Who cares?
Click to expand...
I'm just pointing out that the fact-checking of JD Vance's heritage is probably in retaliation for Donald Trump's attacks on Kamala Harris last July. I'm not saying that makes it right, but that's how politics are played nowadays.
 
#25,298
#25,298
utvolpj said:
Trump also made a big deal out of Obama and Warren.
Click to expand...
Indeed, he did. The ancestry of Democrats, seems to be quite a hang-up for Donald Trump.

In 2011, Donald Trump even claimed to have dispatched private investigators to Hawaii, in order to investigate whether or not Barack Obama was born in the United States. Donald Trump also said that those private investigators he had hired "can't believe what they're finding." Donald Trump then added that he would be calling a press conference in two weeks to reveal the findings of his private investigators.

However, no such press conference was ever held.
 
#25,299
#25,299
Orange_Crush said:
No. Actually, it's reading comprehension and a long history of watching you write checks and retreat with Luther-like form. Your assumptions were wrapped up in accusing me of a lack of self-awareness. You continued to follow from there. Trying to parse it in the way you are merely shows you to be behaving in an intellectually dishonest manner.

Stop making it worse. Do better. It's for your own good. Begin operating in good faith so that we can start taking you slightly more seriously than we currently do.
Click to expand...
Isnt he the oft fired bank teller ?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top