President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

No but I also believe that they will have minimal impact and what impact they do have will be short lived.

Because Trump will reverse them or do you have some other reasoning

Idk how you can directly raise the cost of goods and not feel a significant impact
 
Who is suggesting second amendment remedies

Not now. As with reference to the Kathy Griffin thing, which was outrageous, resort to Second Amendmebt remedies was a comment by a Tea Party congressional candidate Sharron Angle.

My point is, reference to second amendment remedies or cutting off heads seems much more vivid a description of death to a political opponents than is a number.

It feels like MAGAA folks want to try to drum up some kind of faux outrage at the number and are layering onto it way more interpretation than is justified.
 

I posted about this during his first term as well. It is comical how important a trivial individual accolade, such as the Nobel Peace Prize, is to Donald Trump. He is guided by a deep need for praise and adoration. It is textbook narcissism.


Really, who cares? As long as the killing stops and there is pease in war-torn regions he can have what he wants.

However, he will also deserve it. Unlike BO who was anointed a NPP. Which is worse?
 
Really, who cares? As long as the killing stops and there is pease in war-torn regions he can have what he wants.

However, he will also deserve it. Unlike BO who was anointed a NPP. Which is worse?
Trump obviously cares .... A LOT.

It is funny how important such a trivial matter is to him. Only someone who also prompts his cabinet members to kiss his butt during staged televised meetings would obsess over something this trite. Trump's ego has a life of it's own.

.... and Obama publicly acknowledged that he had not earned his Nobel Peace Prize. So, to answer your question : Trump's conduct is much worse.
 
Not now. As with reference to the Kathy Griffin thing, which was outrageous, resort to Second Amendmebt remedies was a comment by a Tea Party congressional candidate Sharron Angle.

My point is, reference to second amendment remedies or cutting off heads seems much more vivid a description of death to a political opponents than is a number.

It feels like MAGAA folks want to try to drum up some kind of faux outrage at the number and are layering onto it way more interpretation than is justified.

I agree. They’re reaching here
 
Advertisement

Back
Top