President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

EXCLUSIVE: ICE Barbie Kristi Noem is backing Insane Reality TV Show where Immigrants Compete For fast-tracked citizenship​


She's been called 'ICE Barbie' for treating her Cabinet position like a TV production, but now Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is pushing for an actual reality show pitting immigrants against each other 'for the honor of fast-tracking their way to U.S. citizenship'.

It may sound like a joke, but the idea is for real and is outlined in a 35-page program pitch put together in coordination with the DHS secretary, DailyMail.com can exclusively reveal.

Noem is even offering up officials from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to tally votes for the made-for-TV contest.

The proposed series is called The American, named after the train that contestants would ride around the country, competing in regionally specific 'cultural' contests such as rolling logs in Wisconsin.

It would lead to a grand finale with the winner getting sworn in on the steps of the U.S. Capitol.

1747334910886.png
She was seen flaunting a $50,000 Rolex last month while touring the hellhole El Salvador prison where the President has exiled plane-loads of Venezuelan gangsters

 
  • Like
Reactions: TrumpedUpVol
It’s correcting to his whining.
His "whining" triggers you? It's not correcting. It's boasting. You doing it is great thing all by itself. No need to acknowledge it unless you have have an incessant need to make it personal against him. You could have simply stated you give back in that specificity. You aren't covering for him in any manner. It's practically a "donation" of some sort. The best feeling in the world is to give to a worthy cause and no one knowing you're doing it. It's easy to do it that way, but most importantly, it doesn't make you more worthy than someone who can't do it as you do. Are you suggesting it's a toil for you to do it? Of course not, or you shouldn't be doing it
 
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argued House Republicans’ plans to reduce spending on Medicaid weren’t real cuts to the program during two hearings in front of lawmakers Wednesday.

“I don’t know if you understand this, or whether you’re just mouthing the Democratic talking points,” he told Rep. Josh Harder, D-Calif., during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on the HHS budget. “The cuts to Medicaid are for fraud, waste and abuse.”


“Dont trust the billionaires”. I don’t either and that is what these cuts are doing - taking money from the crooks in congress.
Right, the unqualified doofus that holds a job he is unqualified to hold that he got by being ideologically and morally flexible… HE said it was cool? Well alright then. You can trust him, I choose not to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
Yes! Great programs to help those in need, I’m sure all those bills were introduced, expanded, and supported by conservatives all the way from inception to today.


You’re moving the goal posts to an extreme degree. You said we don’t feed the children here.

I gave you multiple programs where we do feed the children
 
You’re moving the goal posts to an extreme degree. You said we don’t feed the children here.

I gave you multiple programs where we do feed the children
There is no goal, there are no posts, it’s called a discussion, it evolves. If you limit your discussions to one train of thought, they must get really boring, really quickly.

Yes, you gave me a bunch of great progressive programs that have been in place for decades. I agreed they are great, good thing the liberals prevailed in getting those programs passed. Do you agree with DOGE cutting hundreds of millions from them?
 
There is no goal, there are no posts, it’s called a discussion, it evolves. If you limit your discussions to one train of thought, they must get really boring, really quickly.

Yes, you gave me a bunch of great progressive programs that have been in place for decades. I agreed they are great, good thing the liberals prevailed in getting those programs passed. Do you agree with DOGE cutting hundreds of millions from them?

Absolutely!
 
His "whining" triggers you? It's not correcting. It's boasting. You doing it is great thing all by itself. No need to acknowledge it unless you have have an incessant need to make it personal against him. You could have simply stated you give back in that specificity. You aren't covering for him in any manner. It's practically a "donation" of some sort. The best feeling in the world is to give to a worthy cause and no one knowing you're doing it. It's easy to do it that way, but most importantly, it doesn't make you more worthy than someone who can't do it as you do. Are you suggesting it's a toil for you to do it? Of course not, or you shouldn't be doing it
His whining needed correcting.
 
Did I see where the nominee for surgeon general doesn't have a medical degree? Or did I imagine it? With RFK Jr heading the FDA, it wouldn't be a surprise given Trump's inauguration speech on awarding positions based on meritocracy! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
Did I see where the nominee for surgeon general doesn't have a medical degree? Or did I imagine it? With RFK Jr heading the FDA, it wouldn't be a surprise given Trump's inauguration speech on awarding positions based on meritocracy! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I believe she has a degree but can't practice. Could probably sell you some great supplements though
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
His whining needed correcting.
Why? It shouldn't have any sort of an adverse effect upon you. Being proud of your deed is fine. The need to make it a competition of some sort is petty, immature and self self serving. Do you give your time or money to a cause for selfish reasons? So you can use it to confront someone who may disagree with you? Again, of course not. You don't do it for that reason. No need to make it look like that, AFTER the fact
 
Why? It shouldn't have any sort of an adverse effect upon you. Being proud of your deed is fine. The need to make it a competition of some sort is petty, immature and self self serving. Do you give your time or money to a cause for selfish reasons? So you can use it to confront someone who may disagree with you? Again, of course not. You don't do it for that reason. No need to make it look like that, AFTER the fact
He said “we”.
We are doing our part to help our fellow neighbor. There is no we, there is a you. Some of us don’t need the government to do our part.
 
He said “we”.
We are doing our part to help our fellow neighbor. There is no we, there is a you. Some of us don’t need the government to do our part.
It is "we". We need the government to help facilitate giving from a personal perspective. I know I do anyway. What if whatever entity of yours gives didn't get tax relief for doing so? Guess who provides that tax relief?
 
It is "we". We need the government to help facilitate giving from a personal perspective. I know I do anyway. What if whatever entity of yours gives didn't get tax relief for doing so? Guess who provides that tax relief?
Like I said, that’s a you problem, not a we problem.
 
There is no goal, there are no posts, it’s called a discussion, it evolves. If you limit your discussions to one train of thought, they must get really boring, really quickly.

Yes, you gave me a bunch of great progressive programs that have been in place for decades. I agreed they are great, good thing the liberals prevailed in getting those programs passed. Do you agree with DOGE cutting hundreds of millions from them?
yes, 100%
 
Advertisement

Back
Top