volsarelife1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2017
- Messages
- 14,427
- Likes
- 18,406
I loved playing 18 division games every year. Made rivalries that much better.
Now We play the Mets and Phillies less so we can play a series against The A's and Royals.![]()
I’m definitely not one against change but this has been horrible.
I thought 19 division games was too much especially if you had two bad teams in the division, but there needs to be more balance in terms of games and when they are scheduled. The fact we haven't played the Mets yet and won't until late May is ridiculous.
Man the Rockies are REALLLYY bad. Even their Pythagorean W-L record is only 7-21. Glad we took game 1 with Elder against their "Ace."
For the rest of the series, pitch around Beck and Goodman every opportunity that you can. The rest of their lineup is trash.
There are poorly run franchises among the big 3 sports that have more of a spotlight on them, but I'm not sure there is a more poorly-run franchise in professional sports than the Rockies. Maybe the Charlotte Hornets?Man the Rockies are REALLLYY bad. Even their Pythagorean W-L record is only 7-21. Glad we took game 1 with Elder against their "Ace."
For the rest of the series, pitch around Beck and Goodman every opportunity that you can. The rest of their lineup is trash.
There are poorly run franchises among the big 3 sports that have more of a spotlight on them, but I'm not sure there is a more poorly-run franchise in professional sports than the Rockies. Maybe the Charlotte Hornets?
The thing about the Rockies is that they operate with exactly zero sense of direction. At least a team like the Browns, even though they make terrible decisions, seem to have some kind of plan. It's usually a dumb plan, but at least it's a plan. The Rockies do stuff like not wanting to pay Nolan Arenado and trading him and letting Trevor Story walk, then signing a washed Kris Bryant for $182m. They operate like an 8-year-old playing GM mode in MLB The Show.
There are poorly run franchises among the big 3 sports that have more of a spotlight on them, but I'm not sure there is a more poorly-run franchise in professional sports than the Rockies. Maybe the Charlotte Hornets?
The thing about the Rockies is that they operate with exactly zero sense of direction. At least a team like the Browns, even though they make terrible decisions, seem to have some kind of plan. It's usually a dumb plan, but at least it's a plan. The Rockies do stuff like not wanting to pay Nolan Arenado and trading him and letting Trevor Story walk, then signing a washed Kris Bryant for $182m. They operate like an 8-year-old playing GM mode in MLB The Show.
The Angels are bad but having Trout + Ohtani and never managing a winning season or making the playoffs is also a function of baseball being a different game than basketball or football.The Angels have to be on that list as well. At least the Rockies can develop their own stars at a semi decent rate. If I recall correctly, after drafting Trout, the player with the most career WAR that the Angels have produced from their own farm system is Kole Calhoun with 14.7 bWAR. I mean this is a team that constantly drafts inside the top 10 and they never produce any quality Major league talent. Although, it looks like Zach Neto might be bucking that trend.
Not only that, but they had the 2 best players, bar none, in all of baseball together for 6 years and they couldn't manage even ONE winning season. That takes a really special level of ineptitude. Granted, some time was missed due to injury, but there is zero reason they should have been as bad as they have been given their resources.
The whole Jack Eichel/Sam Reinhart ordeal with Buffalo is still mindblowing.Hornets just changed ownership group in the last two years. My top 5 would be Sabres, Rockies, Athletics, Browns and Kings in some order. Raiders is pretty close as well.
The Angels are bad but having Trout + Ohtani and never managing a winning season or making the playoffs is also a function of baseball being a different game than basketball or football.
If they had 2 players of that caliber in an NBA lineup, they would not only be making the playoffs but probably would have been making playoff runs. In football, they might have at least been a playoff team if they had a guy at QB of Trout or Ohtani's caliber? In baseball it's hard...Ohtani was the SP 20% of the time, and you can pitch around 2 guys in a 9-person batting order.