Type Orange+
Nulla misericordia
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
- Messages
- 4,309
- Likes
- 16,308
Not intended to be a belligerent answer, but you would have to ask them that.
There is no longer a governing body in college athletics. The NCAA is now a toothless tiger and it has left a void.
And that’s where the issues lie, because it’s a double edged sword with getting a wr for depth vs a wr that may push mm/stayley out. Personally, I would look for a 1-2 year guy that could be a 4th or someone to roll with Brazzell/mm, then get an extra wr or two in the ‘26 to build the depth and then we can keep the guys we have because of seniorityYou’ve seen Staley in a lot of practices?
Unproven does not mean bad.
I hear you on the depth. So what do you want? A guy that will push either MM or Staley to the portal or a depth piece from the portal that doesn’t exist?
If I remember correctly, that mrpeabody that ppl claim is an insider said something along that lines, as did people on twitter who supposedly, ik it’s a tifwiw source, have connections, said similar as well. Ik those aren’t reliable sources, but it does make sense. If ur an upperclassman who already has the chemistry with the team, you wouldn’t want to go to a team that returns 444 receiving yards in total, it could damage said qb’s career. So I do understand it, and on the small chance that one of Nico’s terms was help at wr, I could also see that. Although im not sure how reliable those rumors wereWho besides TB?
Nice.View attachment 737723
My onions, they can't wait for tater cakes.
Until college players can be paid to play, rather than being paid for their NIL, this will continue to be the goat rodeo it currently is. When it is legal to pay them to play, binding contracts and commitments related to their play at a specific school can happen. NIL (real NIL) will then drop to a fraction of what it is now, and with it the silliness diminishes. I assume this is possible now, but prohibited by the NCAA, so congress may be getting involved to pry the NCAA's dying hands off of it.To what end?
The market is working itself out - see Nico.
The WR's and O-line was not the problem last year. It wasn't the WR's or the line that killed these drives.
Whomever the next QB is he will be completely set up for success.
The government angle is the idea that Congress could be persuaded or bribed to pass an exemption from US antitrust law for college football. The NCAA and university presidents, etc., haven't been able to make a deal with Congress. Pate yesterday (I think) said that the TV networks are accustomed to getting what they want from the government and are entities much bigger (wealthier) than college sports, as big as that is, and networks would be the ones who could obtain exemption from the law for the schools.To what end?
The market is working itself out - see Nico.