Notre Dame quarterback Steve Angeli

#27
#27
This is a slam dunk then.
For every Milton, Burrow, Hooker
there are 5 Harrison Bailey, Dormady, DJU, Riola, Radhada, Brock VandaGriff's.

I'm not saying even that he wouldn't or couldn't do well here, I'm just saying that I don't think he's getting in the portal because he's the guy at UT right now. I'm sure they're shooting higher.
Okay, I see your edit now. I’ll agree to that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cobb-Webb 1989
#30
#30
I disagree. Angeli has proven himself with the work he has done on the field.
Proven himself? Most of his playing time was mop up duty. He had a nice drive in a playoff game. That’s impressive, but doesn’t make him “proven”. Again, he could come in and do well, totally possible. Im just saying it’s far from a slam dunk, sure thing, etc and I can promise you he would be a second tier option if they miss on proven starters. Yes, guys get passed up one place and go elsewhere and do well, but it’s not the norm. It’s a low risk /high reward move if they miss in proven starters. I wouldn’t be against bringing him at all, but in no way should he be identified as “the guy” or a first tier option.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1497.jpeg
    IMG_1497.jpeg
    213.6 KB · Views: 10
#31
#31
Facts hurt my man
The fact is he was behind Sam Hartman and then Riley Leonard. The fact is he has a 10-1 TD-INT ratio. The fact is that he was in a damn good stable of QBs and couldn’t win the job and that’s no fault on his athletic abilities. He stuck it out for 3 years. Kid is a stub and would be a slam dunk for Hype.


We can all argue back and forth and it’s fun doing so but it seems some have set the bar too high for who they think will come here.
 
#32
#32
So every quarterback that gets relegated to 2nd or 3rd string is Milton, or Hooker, etc?

Also, my point was that that was the reason he was in the portal, and that UT wasn't the reason.
Oh how we would love to have a hooker this season!
 
#33
#33
Proven himself? Most of his playing time was mop up duty. He had a nice drive in a playoff game. That’s impressive, but doesn’t make him “proven”. Again, he could come in and do well, totally possible. Im just saying it’s far from a slam dunk, sure thing, etc and I can promise you he would be a second tier option if they miss on proven starters. Yes, guys get passed up one place and go elsewhere and do well, but it’s not the norm. It’s a low risk /high reward move if they miss in proven starters. I wouldn’t be against bringing him at all, but in no way should he be identified as “the guy” or a first tier option.
Forgot his game against Oregon state.
 
#34
#34
The fact is he was behind Sam Hartman and then Riley Leonard. The fact is he has a 10-1 TD-INT ratio. The fact is that he was in a damn good stable of QBs and couldn’t win the job and that’s no fault on his athletic abilities. He stuck it out for 3 years. Kid is a stub and would be a slam dunk for Hype.


We can all argue back and forth and it’s fun doing so but it seems some have set the bar too high for who they think will come here.
Nico was? I didn’t know that
 
#35
#35
Proven himself? Most of his playing time was mop up duty. He had a nice drive in a playoff game. That’s impressive, but doesn’t make him “proven”. Again, he could come in and do well, totally possible. Im just saying it’s far from a slam dunk, sure thing, etc and I can promise you he would be a second tier option if they miss on proven starters. Yes, guys get passed up one place and go elsewhere and do well, but it’s not the norm. It’s a low risk /high reward move if they miss in proven starters. I wouldn’t be against bringing him at all, but in no way should he be identified as “the guy” or a first tier option.
UT is looking at other options, but he is on their list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOL931 and Ratvol
#39
#39
You’re not following. You named a couple outliers and @Volfan_1999 asked you to name the laundry list of QB’s who got passed up on the depth chart who didn’t work out(because that’s what you were talking about) and you said Nico.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1498.jpeg
    IMG_1498.jpeg
    157.2 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
#40
#40
Oh, well boy is my face red! That one game against Oregon State. He’s so mischievous more proven that a sitting starting quarterback who has a season under his belt. Slam dunk. For sure.
15-19 232 yards 3 tds. Oregon state had a top 40 defense. But hey. The kids not proven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 89 VOLS grad
#41
#41
The fact is he was behind Sam Hartman and then Riley Leonard. The fact is he has a 10-1 TD-INT ratio. The fact is that he was in a damn good stable of QBs and couldn’t win the job and that’s no fault on his athletic abilities. He stuck it out for 3 years. Kid is a stub and would be a slam dunk for Hype.


We can all argue back and forth and it’s fun doing so but it seems some have set the bar too high for who they think will come here.
Cool, Im gonna go ahead and compile a list of backup and 3rd stringers at other schools so we can find other slam dunks.
 
#44
#44
15-19 232 yards 3 tds. Oregon state had a top 40 defense. But hey. The kids not proven.
One game is your definition of “proven”? If that’s the case , then yeah, I am setting the bar high. I could sit here and find a game or two other QB2’s or QB3’s had in their career. He was so proven he was passed up by two players in his team after that historic performance against that legendary Oregon State team.
 
#47
#47
You’re not following. You named a couple outliers and @Volfan_1999 asked you to name the laundry list of QB’s who got passed up on the forth chart who didn’t work out(because that’s what you were talking about) and you said Nico.
It’s was a jab dude. Outliers? Not many at QB.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top