President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#19,977
#19,977
Orangeslice13 said:
I have a question……
And this can be for anyone.


So what?
Seriously, why is the “paid protestors” such a talking point.
For either side. The right says the left does it. The left tries to make it sound like a conspiracy theory. Meanwhile I’m thinking “meh” nobody in the middle gives a **** about protests”
It’s not like people who are Republicans would go and protest Trump for a few dollars. How is paying protesters any different than any other form of marketing?

The whole argument is stupidity
Click to expand...
I say the paid protesters should wear patches of their sponsors like NASCAR drivers.... score some pub.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, dovervolz, NorthDallas40 and 4 others
#19,980
#19,980
utvolpj said:
You shill like a dem protester except it's unlikely you're getting paid. You should look into that

This admin is falling all over itself and these helpful drastic measures you reference are simply not happening. Get your head up and look around a bit
Click to expand...
Provide instances where the Democratic Party in helping Americans (not handing out).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz and SpaceCoastVol
#19,983
#19,983
Buddy’s Bandit said:
Provide instances where the Democratic Party in helping Americans (not handing out).
Click to expand...
Why am I being tasked with something I've never claimed? Find someone else to play your dumb game

Both parties can be failures. That includes this current admin who seems to be making it up as they go after 4yrs of prep
 
#19,984
#19,984
LSU-SIU said:
What argument is that?
Click to expand...
evillawyer said:
You're not concerned the government can deport someone wrongly (he had legal protection against being reported to El Salvador - whether you agree with that or not), and just say "whoopsie, there's nothing we can do because this person is no longer in US custody and the US doesn't have jurisdiction over El Salvadorian authorities." Notice that nothing turns on his status - it's all about the US government saying there's nothing we can do for you if you're no longer in our custody and those who do have custody of you aren't subject to the jurisdiction of US courts. Doesn't that seem like something that can be abused over and over to disappear people, regardless of their legal status?
Click to expand...
 
#19,989
#19,989
@evillawyer

That appears to be two different things, meaning I think Americans should be concerned if justice is not served but that is a generalization. The second part seems to be an incorrect legal conclusion imo as if the courts can determine foreign affairs there is no bounds to their oversight even though they have no authority or jurisdiction. I would think someone would be equally or even more concern of the court overstepping their jurisdiction and authority as a generalization.

You have to remember the people you voted for, not only attempted to murder Americans overseas but were actually successful at it. It would seem if they lack jurisdiction there that this one is even simpler at this stage.

We'll see how this turns out but it seem like people should be concerned that non-elected judges are not only overstepping their authority but they seem to believe they are the ones to decided foreign policy or it could very easily get that way.

What next? The court orders the government to end world hunger?

In this case, I would say justice was mostly served based on the information in the public domain, maybe someone doesn't like the process but just on the face what is known... he most likely committed multiple crimes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#19,991
#19,991
Orangeslice13 said:
So in conclusion we asked, they said “nope, we’re keeping him” and that’s the end. No order was ignored
Click to expand...
It is kinda crazy to think there are those who believe out-sourcing Congressional authority to declare war to the Executive Branch is not enough. Now, they think we should give the Judicial Branch that same power. Just bonkers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#19,994
#19,994
Ritzwatch said:
It is kinda crazy to think there are those who believe out-sourcing Congressional authority to declare war to the Executive Branch is not enough. Now, they think we should give the Judicial Branch that same power. Just bonkers.
Click to expand...
It would appear that the district court judge is second to only G-d almighty in terms of power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ritzwatch and StarRaider
#19,997
#19,997
Vol8188 said:
I could defend high interest rates from my political perspective with 100% consistency.

I have no clue how you could from yours. Care to explain how you see high interest rates as a positive?
Click to expand...
I don't. But I also don't see trying to lower them through a quite-possible recession as a valid method. But a recession DOES achieve the goal of cheap borrowing and cheap labor. "buy the dip" but in labor.
 
#19,998
#19,998
evillawyer said:
Who had the CCP quoting Reagan back to Americans on their 2025 bingo card?

Click to expand...


So, what is your solution? If tariffs don't work, why do they work for all the countries you are protecting? What he is describing appears to be what has happened over the last 50-70 years, that is no longer sustainable.

Everything that happened over the last 80+/- years is in the process of reversing, the reverse will be 10 times faster though. Globalization is dead.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top