NEO
Eat at Joe's
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 19,282
- Likes
- 15,008
The ol' "are you better off today than you were two/four years ago?" question will be biting the trumpublican party in their fat arse.
Just hope the damage isn't catastrophic for to many.
Those who have experience in broad, supply chain management, banking and insurance all understand the shat storm the current policies will yield given the current state of our financial makeupI can 100 percent state the banking and insurance industries are prepping for a full collapse. In my 20 plus years in the industry I have never seen the actuaries freaking out like this. I was in the industry during the bush collapse and this eclipses that by 10 fold and I am only saying this because I’ve chatted with some of you for decades now and I’m personally nervous. I am not an economist nor gonna pretend to be one. This change occurred last spring prior to Trump and the tightening has gotten anaconda level at this point.
What about a little forethought and prudence before implementing any drastic policy changes? Far too much indecisiveness from day to day on economic issues
We are at 37 trillion in debt. That was created by both sides. Neither party has ever had any for thought. We got here because our politicians F’d us and I mean all of em.
Those who have experience in broad, supply chain management, banking and insurance all understand the shat storm the current policies will yield given the current state of our financial makeup
It doesn't need to be so available. The first couple of decades of my life were a time when saving money for the middle class could actually build wealth of some sort. It was also a time when saving a nice chunk was possible while still living a fairly comfortable life.Maybe, but these are largely personal decisions/choices wrt how consumers handle their personal finances that transcend administrations.
Agreed. Easy money for people with no financial discipline is trouble, but banks are counting on that and hoping they can get backstopped yet again. We’ve learned nothing, it seems.It doesn't need to be so available. The first couple of decades of my life were a time when saving money for the middle class could actually build wealth of some sort. It was also a time when saving a nice chunk was possible while still living a fairly comfortable life.
Fair enough. I should have said "most". There is some brand name I will buy, but overt leftist political activism will gather a big no from me. Nike, or AB will never see another of my dollarsCurious indeed. Jack Daniels is a brand name... you don't buy it because of their politics? I rarely think about / research a company's "politics" when buying their product. It's only when a firm overtly flaunts its political slant that I give pause. Tesla comes to mind.
Curious indeed. Jack Daniels is a brand name... you don't buy it because of their politics? I rarely think about / research a company's "politics" when buying their product. It's only when a firm overtly flaunts its political slant that I give pause. Tesla comes to mind.
If some investment bank would take the offer, some capital hedge fund would do a Michael Burry short on the car loan industryAgreed. Easy money for people with no financial discipline is trouble, but banks are counting on that and hoping they can get backstopped yet again. We’ve learned nothing, it seems.