Buddy’s Bandit
Tennessean by the Grace of God
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2017
- Messages
- 5,625
- Likes
- 19,666
Picture hardly indicates they are “together” and “right next to each other”. It appears they are at an impromptu de event and are in a group.The Trump Administration employs such honest people .....
![]()
Mike Waltz Says He’s Never Met Jeffrey Goldberg. Here’s a Photo of Them Together
Trump’s national security adviser and The Atlantic editor provided conflicting accounts about whether or not they’ve met. A photo could help set the record straight.www.thedailybeast.com
If Mike Waltz isn't fired tomorrow, then Donald Trump simply doesn't care about national security or the integrity of his cabinet members. Mike Waltz is not only stupid. He is a flat-out liar. In that group photo, Jeffrey Goldberg and Mike Waltz are standing right next to each other.
You aren't being serious about the picture proving they met are you?The Trump Administration employs such honest people .....
![]()
Mike Waltz Says He’s Never Met Jeffrey Goldberg. Here’s a Photo of Them Together
Trump’s national security adviser and The Atlantic editor provided conflicting accounts about whether or not they’ve met. A photo could help set the record straight.www.thedailybeast.com
If Mike Waltz isn't fired tomorrow, then Donald Trump simply doesn't care about national security or the integrity of his cabinet members. Mike Waltz is not only stupid. He is a flat-out liar. In that group photo, Jeffrey Goldberg and Mike Waltz are standing right next to each other.
The picture is meaningless. Point #1 is valid. Point #2 doesn't do anything for me. I've met people in a business capacity I have no recollection of meeting.By itself? No.
.... but in conjunction with the other 2 things I mentioned ?
1) Waltz had Goldberg's contact information saved on his phone.
2) Goldberg said that they had met.
Absolutely I am.
All the more reason for Trump's cabinet members not to include the editor of The Atlantic in a group chat. Jeffrey Goldberg did not hack his way in. He was invited. You can not discredit this story by attacking The Atlantic and/or Jeffrey Goldberg. In fact, attacking Goldberg, only makes it harder to explain why he was invited into their group chat.
I find the inclusion more egregious than the use of Signal and the "war" details shared .All the more reason for Trump's cabinet members not to include the editor of The Atlantic in a group chat. Jeffrey Goldberg did not hack his way in. He was invited. You can not discredit this story by attacking The Atlantic and/or Jeffrey Goldberg. In fact, attacking Goldberg, only makes it harder to explain why he was invited into their group chat.
I can't decide which is worse ....Agreed. And it's my firm belief that his inclusion was no accident.
First I will acknowledge that Walz answer almost seemed to protest too much to knowing Goldberg. I think he definitely could be FOS.The Trump Administration employs such honest people .....
![]()
Mike Waltz Says He’s Never Met Jeffrey Goldberg. Here’s a Photo of Them Together
Trump’s national security adviser and The Atlantic editor provided conflicting accounts about whether or not they’ve met. A photo could help set the record straight.www.thedailybeast.com
If Mike Waltz isn't fired tomorrow, then Donald Trump simply doesn't care about national security or the integrity of his cabinet members. Mike Waltz is not only stupid. He is a flat-out liar. In that group photo, Jeffrey Goldberg and Mike Waltz are standing right next to each other.
I mean it could be his contacts were altered without his knowledge somehow but still doesn’t excuse it imo. Just makes the incompetence a little less glaringI can't decide which is worse ....
1) Being careless enough to do this by accident.
2) Being a mole, who wanted to give Goldberg access to this chat.
They are both bad. Mike Waltz is either a buffoon or incredibly dishonest. It pretty much has to be one or the other.
Well he works for the Gov so I'm going with......... Both.I can't decide which is worse ....
1) Being careless enough to do this by accident.
2) Being a mole, who wanted to give Goldberg access to this chat.
They are both bad. Mike Waltz is either a buffoon or incredibly dishonest. It pretty much has to be one or the other.
