President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

The Trump Administration employs such honest people .....


If Mike Waltz isn't fired tomorrow, then Donald Trump simply doesn't care about national security or the integrity of his cabinet members. Mike Waltz is not only stupid. He is a flat-out liar. In that group photo, Jeffrey Goldberg and Mike Waltz are standing right next to each other.
Picture hardly indicates they are “together” and “right next to each other”. It appears they are at an impromptu de event and are in a group.

If this is the type stuff you all plan on running on for the mid-terms, keep it up!! As a conservative, I cannot wait!
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
The Trump Administration employs such honest people .....


If Mike Waltz isn't fired tomorrow, then Donald Trump simply doesn't care about national security or the integrity of his cabinet members. Mike Waltz is not only stupid. He is a flat-out liar. In that group photo, Jeffrey Goldberg and Mike Waltz are standing right next to each other.
You aren't being serious about the picture proving they met are you?
 
Y'all gonna buy you some of that there Stablecoin the Trump family is hawking most recently ? Sounds like it can't miss!
I am good friends with a legit Bitcoin multi millionaire. McRib bought some Etherium a few years ago.

That's the extent of my crypto experience.
 
This is unreal….our FBI Director just indicated there are jurisdictions in this country who are NOT cooperating with Secuirty officials to help take down MS13 drug dealers, rapist and murders.

I sincerely hope this does not negatively impact anyone on this board, but I fear, if it hasn’t already, it will eventually.

Liberals are trying to destroy this country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
I am good friends with a legit Bitcoin multi millionaire. McRib bought some Etherium a few years ago.

That's the extent of my crypto experience.


Yes, bitcoin has been the one tulip to pay off. So far. And those thay got in early have done well. Almost irrationally so.
 
You aren't being serious about the picture proving they met are you?
By itself? No.

.... but in conjunction with the other 2 things I mentioned ?

1) Waltz had Goldberg's contact information saved on his phone.
2) Goldberg said that they had met.

Absolutely I am.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Picture hardly indicates they are “together” and “right next to each other”. It appears they are at an impromptu de event and are in a group.

If this is the type stuff you all plan on running on for the mid-terms, keep it up!! As a conservative, I cannot wait!
See post #18,736 up above.
 

All the more reason for Trump's cabinet members not to include the editor of The Atlantic in a group chat. Jeffrey Goldberg did not hack his way in. He was invited. You can not discredit this story by attacking The Atlantic and/or Jeffrey Goldberg. In fact, attacking Goldberg, only makes it harder to explain why he was invited into their group chat.
 
By itself? No.

.... but in conjunction with the other 2 things I mentioned ?

1) Waltz had Goldberg's contact information saved on his phone.
2) Goldberg said that they had met.

Absolutely I am.
The picture is meaningless. Point #1 is valid. Point #2 doesn't do anything for me. I've met people in a business capacity I have no recollection of meeting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
All the more reason for Trump's cabinet members not to include the editor of The Atlantic in a group chat. Jeffrey Goldberg did not hack his way in. He was invited. You can not discredit this story by attacking The Atlantic and/or Jeffrey Goldberg. In fact, attacking Goldberg, only makes it harder to explain why he was invited into their group chat.

Agreed. And it's my firm belief that his inclusion was no accident.
 
All the more reason for Trump's cabinet members not to include the editor of The Atlantic in a group chat. Jeffrey Goldberg did not hack his way in. He was invited. You can not discredit this story by attacking The Atlantic and/or Jeffrey Goldberg. In fact, attacking Goldberg, only makes it harder to explain why he was invited into their group chat.
I find the inclusion more egregious than the use of Signal and the "war" details shared .
 
Agreed. And it's my firm belief that his inclusion was no accident.
I can't decide which is worse ....

1) Being careless enough to do this by accident.
2) Being a mole, who wanted to give Goldberg access to this chat.

They are both bad. Mike Waltz is either a buffoon or incredibly dishonest. It pretty much has to be one or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
The Trump Administration employs such honest people .....


If Mike Waltz isn't fired tomorrow, then Donald Trump simply doesn't care about national security or the integrity of his cabinet members. Mike Waltz is not only stupid. He is a flat-out liar. In that group photo, Jeffrey Goldberg and Mike Waltz are standing right next to each other.
First I will acknowledge that Walz answer almost seemed to protest too much to knowing Goldberg. I think he definitely could be FOS.

But a photo with him at some function isn’t really “knowing” him. I’ve been photographed with people at conventions or group functions couldn’t tell you who the hell they were. Heck I’ve probably been introduced to several people by name and couldn’t tell you after a couple of years who they were either. Waltz seems full of it but this doesn’t really prove anything to me.
 
I can't decide which is worse ....

1) Being careless enough to do this by accident.
2) Being a mole, who wanted to give Goldberg access to this chat.

They are both bad. Mike Waltz is either a buffoon or incredibly dishonest. It pretty much has to be one or the other.
I mean it could be his contacts were altered without his knowledge somehow but still doesn’t excuse it imo. Just makes the incompetence a little less glaring
 
I can't decide which is worse ....

1) Being careless enough to do this by accident.
2) Being a mole, who wanted to give Goldberg access to this chat.

They are both bad. Mike Waltz is either a buffoon or incredibly dishonest. It pretty much has to be one or the other.
Well he works for the Gov so I'm going with......... Both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
Advertisement





Back
Top