President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

Good news for law order ...

From the article:

U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi announced a slew of severe charges Thursday against several violent far-left arsonists who allegedly attacked separate Tesla sites across the country.

A trio of anti-Musk agitators are federally charged over the destruction of these Tesla properties. All three suspects will "face the full force of the law" for allegedly using Molotov cocktails to firebomb Tesla cars and charging stations, according to a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) press release.


 
Hate is meeting rationalization and justification in this thread.

Instead of doxing private citizens and setting cars ablaze, those so inclined should put on their big boy pants and attack the institutions of government. Attack its buildings. Attack its cars. But the little chickenshits won't do that. Wonder why?
Bares a striking resemblance to Hamas attacking a music festival in protest of the Israel government...these people are certified insane..we need insane asylums back pronto...Your watching TDS and EDS in realtime.
 
Bares a striking resemblance to Hamas attacking a music festival in protest of the Israel government...these people are certified insane..we need insane asylums back pronto...Your watching TDS and EDS in realtime.
I have accepted there are lunatics out there doing crazy stuff. I am just surprised that some are considering the actions as simple consequences to being an unlikable billionaire.
 
Are Tesla troops taxing Americans and oppressing them like the British back then?

How does that weird framing of it make a qualitative difference?

It's a protest of a company that is completely intertwined with government. They didn't like taxation without representation? Understandable. People don't like Musk buying his way into the most powerful bureaucratic position in the government. Understandable.
 
Tesla is a publicly traded company so attacking Tesla is an attack on thousands of innocent shareholders.

The BTP was an attack against the British government and nobility. I can’t believe that you can’t see the difference.

The public also had holdings in the EITC.

I swear, 90% of the things you guys claim differentiate the two events don't differentiate them at all.
 
I have accepted there are lunatics out there doing crazy stuff. I am just surprised that some are considering the actions as simple consequences to being an unlikable billionaire.
The funny thing is trying to equate it to the Boston Tea Party...that shows me a total lack of understanding and complete partisan hackery. And from a self proclaimed libratatian it shows a mental breakdown in progress...kinda sad to watch really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
How does that weird framing of it make a qualitative difference?

It's a protest of a company that is completely intertwined with government. They didn't like taxation without representation? Understandable. People don't like Musk buying his way into the most powerful bureaucratic position in the government. Understandable.
Telsa is not "completely intertwined" with the government. Musk maybe, but Tesla certainly isn't.
 
Ok. Remain on your page.

The poupose of retaliation is to hurt Elon?

I guess you'd have to ask the people doing it.

I would say somebody who is setting a Tesla dealership on fire (which is what I've been talking about the whole time) is a completely different person than someone vandalizing somebody's personal Tesla truck. The latter is a coward who probably just hates the archetype of a person he thinks would own a Tesla truck. I think that's a terrible person. Somebody who vandalizes a regular Tesla is likely hurting somebody who also hates Musk. This is just an insane person lashing out. But the first guy who is risking his personal freedom to directly go at what he sees as the evil empire has a different conviction, and his intent is probably to hurt Elon.
 
Telsa is not "completely intertwined" with the government. Musk maybe, but Tesla certainly isn't.

OK, IDK what words you want to define an entanglement where the CEO and largest shareholder is also the most powerful bureaucrat in Washington, DC. That's what's happening. I can't believe we gotta quibble over this semantic.
 
How does that weird framing of it make a qualitative difference?

It's a protest of a company that is completely intertwined with government. They didn't like taxation without representation? Understandable. People don't like Musk buying his way into the most powerful bureaucratic position in the government. Understandable.
The difference is that the British deserved it back then and Telsa doesn't today. The weird framing was brought into this because of your ridiculous comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I guess you'd have to ask the people doing it.

I would say somebody who is setting a Tesla dealership on fire (which is what I've been talking about the whole time) is a completely different person than someone vandalizing somebody's personal Tesla truck. The latter is a coward who probably just hates the archetype of a person he thinks would own a Tesla truck. I think that's a terrible person. Somebody who vandalizes a regular Tesla is likely hurting somebody who also hates Musk. This is just an insane person lashing out. But the first guy who is risking his personal freedom to directly go at what he sees as the evil empire has a different conviction, and his intent is probably to hurt Elon.
Still tracking with you.

I said the arson isnt hurting Elon.

You referenced stock price as a counterpoint.

Correct?
 
Advertisement





Back
Top