VolsSportsFan
Random
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 75,155
- Likes
- 49,114
What an ignorant take. You have no idea the amount of hours put in by the committee members over a period of many months, and they aren’t paid for it, it’s a volunteer position in addition to their day-to-day jobs running multi million dollar enterprises known as collegiate athletic departments.Lots of lazy, overpaid people on the committee who can’t be bothered to adapt a bracket to results from earlier in the day. Heaven forbid they work one Sunday for a few hours.
He was wrong about them being paid, but he’s 100% accurate on them being too lazy to take the results of the conference tournament into consideration for seeding. They could have set the brackets last night showing the SEC winner as a 1 seed and the runner up as a 2. No additional meetings or discussions would be required today. Just pure stupidity IMO.What an ignorant take. You have no idea the amount of hours put in by the committee members over a period of many months, and they aren’t paid for it, it’s a volunteer position in addition to their day-to-day jobs running multi million dollar enterprises known as collegiate athletic departments.
I guarantee you that’s what they’ve done. Otherwise Bubba Cunningham wouldn’t have said in a live interview yesterday, “there are six teams alive for #1 seeds.” This was before Alabama lost, so now there are five: Auburn, Duke, Houston, and I would surmise the winner of our game today. It’s easy to flip-flop two SEC teams in the bracket when you know where they’re going to definitively land for the opening rounds (us to Lexington and Florida to Raleigh, regardless of outcome) as well as the regions (winner gets #1 West, loser gets #2 Midwest).He was wrong about them being paid, but he’s 100% accurate on them being too lazy to take the results of the conference tournament into consideration for seeding. They could have set the brackets last night showing the SEC winner as a 1 seed and the runner up as a 2. No additional meetings or discussions would be required today. Just pure stupidity IMO.
ExactlyThis is why it's so important that Tennessee wins, to show the absurdity of it all yet again. If the committee doesn't give a 1 to a team thats on the brink of being on the 1ine after beating 2projected 1 seeds back to back, then they lose credibility forever. Either these games matter, or they don't. If you don't reward a team for beating 2 top 5 teams in 2 days just because the timing isn't convenient, then blow it all up.
I guarantee you that’s what they’ve done. Otherwise Bubba Cunningham wouldn’t have said in a live interview yesterday, “there are six teams alive for #1 seeds.” This was before Alabama lost, so now there are five: Auburn, Duke, Houston, and I would surmise the winner of our game today. It’s easy to flip-flop two SEC teams in the bracket when you know where they’re going to definitively land for the opening rounds (us to Lexington and Florida to Raleigh, regardless of outcome) as well as the regions (winner gets #1 West, loser gets #2 Midwest).
If we beat Florida and still end up a 2 seed, then the committee has lost all credibility from now on.
I guarantee you that’s what they’ve done. Otherwise Bubba Cunningham wouldn’t have said in a live interview yesterday, “there are six teams alive for #1 seeds.” This was before Alabama lost, so now there are five: Auburn, Duke, Houston, and I would surmise the winner of our game today. It’s easy to flip-flop two SEC teams in the bracket when you know where they’re going to definitively land for the opening rounds (us to Lexington and Florida to Raleigh, regardless of outcome) as well as the regions (winner gets #1 West, loser gets #2 Midwest).
What an ignorant take. You have no idea the amount of hours put in by the committee members over a period of many months, and they aren’t paid for it, it’s a volunteer position in addition to their day-to-day jobs running multi million dollar enterprises known as collegiate athletic departments.
I can’t. But he can when they ask him the question on-air after the bracket reveal.
Good points. It would be ridiculous not to get a 1 seed with our resume and beating Auburn and Florida on consecutive days on a neutral floor. But I have a feeling we won’t get one even if we win. Florida could make it a moot point anyway. Should be a fun game today.And not only that, they have essentially admitted that the conference tournaments are meaningless (with regard to the highest seeds) after a long, grinding season. I want UT to win to get these kids a trophy, but at what cost if they are robbed of a 1 seed and then come out flat in the NCAA's after a couple of tough, emotional wins?
So you’re sticking with Vols as a 1 with a win?I guarantee you that’s what they’ve done. Otherwise Bubba Cunningham wouldn’t have said in a live interview yesterday, “there are six teams alive for #1 seeds.” This was before Alabama lost, so now there are five: Auburn, Duke, Houston, and I would surmise the winner of our game today. It’s easy to flip-flop two SEC teams in the bracket when you know where they’re going to definitively land for the opening rounds (us to Lexington and Florida to Raleigh, regardless of outcome) as well as the regions (winner gets #1 West, loser gets #2 Midwest).
You might be right that it would move in that direction, but none of those other teams had players meeting in hotel rooms to plan going to the same team. Players being drafted or traded for is a bit different than organizing with free agents to form a superteam. James couldn't win a title organically, so he had to go out and form a team to win.
You’re 100% positive of that, huh? I’ll see you later if/when we win, then.And you would be wrong again. They have their bracket. Lunardi has made that clear and he’s the committee’s mouthpiece. Today is irrelevant which is sheer laziness on the committee’s part. Now in their defense, it’s a simple fix: move the championship game to Saturday.