President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#15,538
#15,538
McDad said:
Lol.
Guilt by juxtaposition?
Click to expand...
Next attack on deck

“Did you know there was this guy recently convicted of raping and physically abusing children. Come to find out several years ago he and Marco Rubio were seen eating at the same restaurant in Florida. Not together, but in the same section. These are the people Trump chose for his Cabinet!!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, BreatheUT, InVOLuntary and 2 others
#15,541
#15,541
Pepe_Silvia said:
"Sitting near" an alleged sex offender at an athletic event with hundreds (if not thousands) of attendees is now an indictment.
Click to expand...

Keyword...alleged.

I personally dont like Tate because hes a misogynist muslim loudmouth. To my knowledge he has only been charged with those crimes and not convicted...and they seem awful sketchy as far as the allegations. Which are also in Europe, not here where any American would have jurisdiction, both the charges and the location of the alleged crimes. Sounds like a cash grab to me by the female in question, along with a government very quick to prosecute Tate because of his conservative political stances in a very Leftist and Globalist country.

Aside from the preposterous nature of trying to discredit someone based on who happened to buy tickets in the same general area of a coliseum...which is insane by itself...as usual the the Liberal idiots are lying and slandering Tate by calling him names pertaining to crimes he has not been convicted of committing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#15,542
#15,542
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Bitch & gripe. That's all democrats do. Why not come up w/a plan to move forward.
Anybody can sit on the sideline & complain/bitch all day but voters want change.
Al Green was asked nicely to sit down & show some respect to the Office of POTUS.
Green wants to be like a MLK type where you show a resistance & fight but not there.
Click to expand...

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows this isn’t the case. Lateefa is just spewing BS racist propaganda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and marcusluvsvols
#15,545
#15,545
85SugarVol said:
I was thinking of the big story a few years back at Harvard - but that was the school rescinding admission over speech, so not exactly the same thing.

I want to say I remember this girl at Alabama, but I may be conflating her with another white sorority girl that went bananas on social.

Loading…

thehill.com
Click to expand...
Wow…..I’m a white 57 year old and I’ve never personally known anyone as racially vile as this young lady.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary, marcusluvsvols and 2 others
#15,547
#15,547
whodeycin85 said:
You do realize this is just speaking to biological anonimalies and not natural science...if this article is legit..there should be provable biological of the human species naturally changing there dna from male to female or vice versa. Hell natural selection would do that over time if it was beneficial to the spieces.
Click to expand...
The cited article appeared in Scientific American which is frequently shelved with other authoritative journals like Rolling Stone, People, Mad Magazine, National Enquirer and so on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#15,548
#15,548
NCFisher said:
Your article fails to point out that in the U.S. population of 340 million, for example, a ratio of 1 in 80K - or about 4250 persons - have Swyers Syndrome. Of those, 15-20% exhibit presence of the SRY gene, or about 850 total persons. As correctly pointed out, these are biological chromosomal abnormalities. There are treatments to mitigate - to normalize - these biological deviancies to avoid infertility (a pretty necessary component of species propagation) and high-risk of osteoporosis.

In other words, these are maladies to be treated and researched to prevent. SA's attempt to harumph recognition of these chromosomal abnormalities as transphobia is simply advocacy agenda, not science. It is literally saying 'you don't understand sexual biology' when correctly asserting 339,995,750 of Americans are chromosomally normative. SA might as well say that acknowledging those with Symbrachydactyly (a congenital deformity or absence of fingers) present in 1 of 32K people, is as normal as those without the condition. That is, unless you're an activist scientist, you simply don't understand what normal fingers are.

You should read - or attempt to critically understand - your own links.
Click to expand...
And that's what a smack-down looks like.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top