McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 61,782
- Likes
- 133,004
For the people desperately wanting Reuters to be a leftist Trump hating propaganda house
![]()
Reuters - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion ormediabiasfactcheck.com
View attachment 724215
I think this is a simple way of looking at it. i am not sure it would work that way in application.
agree with much of what you shared, though.
Yea.they wanted to eliminate ICEThe people that were happy that Biden was willfully not enforcing immigration law are the same people that are upset Trump wants to get rid of agencies. The difference is, I would say he claimed he was enforcing the law, while the other is saying these agencies are not required because of fraud, waste, abuse and in some cases criminal activity. (as a generalization)
In application, the President runs the show, Congress writes the law and check, and the Judiciary has oversight on most activity by the government.
People don't realize that Congress can shut the whole ************ down as well either through lack of funding, or just getting rid of agencies and courts..... same thing really.
For the people desperately wanting Reuters to be a leftist Trump hating propaganda house
![]()
Reuters - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion ormediabiasfactcheck.com
View attachment 724215
I actually haven’t read the Reuters piece in question. It might be a trash piece I have no idea. But to just dismiss Reuters as left propaganda is laughable. Now AP is a shell of its former self and contains a bunch of trash nowadays. But not Reuters from what I’ve seen. Not in a significant amount of content. Trash pieces can get by any editorial review I’d guess. Hopefully they are largely prefaced with Op-Ed. That is a big gripe I have with CNN. They routinely attempt to pass off obvious Op-Ed’s as “Analysis”. If it isn’t just “news” on any of the sites the first question should be why is it here?in b4 @jmacvols1 accuses your source of being left wing.
I don't know how many times I've read on forums where people post..."name the source or it's not true". Why don't Reuters name their sources?in b4 @jmacvols1 accuses your source of being left wing.
I don't know how many times I've read on forums where people post..."name the source or it's not true". Why don't Reuters name their sources?
Musk owes Ukraine NOTHING. When the war first started Starlink was used some but Musk did not want his technology used in wars..and he has that right. Where do people get the idea the world owes Ukraine everything.
And don't forget all the people AROUND Puddinhead that LIED about his condition; most of them being unelected and anonymous bureaucrats. Yeah. The leftists screaming at the top of their lungs were strangely quiet then weren't they?where's your proof Musk lied?
You seem to have no problem that Biden lied about everything...and stole an election..and had dementia...and wrecked the economy...and killed people by letting illegals in...
I agree that is what the liberal judiciary attempts to do. However, there is no legitimate constitutional basis for that. The judicial branch only has constitutional authority to interpret laws. Theyrhink tgey havethe ability to create lawout of thin air and to tell the Executive branch how to do its job.In application, the President runs the show, Congress writes the law and check, and the Judiciary has oversight on most activity by the government.
No we do not lol, if your friends act like him you should find new onesI guarantee you have and I don't think you are a bad person for saying it. I think you are silly to mock people for these opinion heavy statements when we all do it. Don't throw rocks when you live in a glass house.
We basically all do the same thing as Elon Musk.
It would help considerably if we actually nominated a decent candidate. Kari Lake isn't. She was convinced she could win major elected offices because people knew her from her many years of reading the news on TV. As it turns out, most people don't think that qualfies her for high level elected offices.It's hard for a Republican to win in Arizona these days. The left has done to it what it wants to do to Texas.