McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 59,723
- Likes
- 127,101
52-48 will be enough to appoint some new Supreme Court justices. If this happens we might to keep our guns a little longer or at least live a little longer so we don’t have to die keeping them.Ah I got ya.
52-48 after election, but 50-50 after Collins & Murk vote with the Dems - which leaves Vance to break the tie.
Which Justice is going to be replaced in the next 4 years that will alter the balance?52-48 will be enough to appoint some new Supreme Court justices. If this happens we might to keep our guns a little longer or at least live a little longer so we don’t have to die keeping them.
I think it's a safe bet you will be keeping your guns regardless. Since that fear mongering narrative was started in the late 1990s, there's never been anything close to a move with legislation to do so. Now, I'm speaking to the idea all guns are going to be taken, which that narrative insinuates much like your post. Hell, Marsha spewed that narrative about Bredesen, who was literally a multi-gun owner and hunter52-48 will be enough to appoint some new Supreme Court justices. If this happens we might to keep our guns a little longer or at least live a little longer so we don’t have to die keeping them.
Which Justice is going to be replaced in the next 4 years that will alter the balance?
Sotomayor gonna keel over? She sure as hell ain’t gonna retire if Trump & GOP are in position to replace her.
Clarence Thomas will likely retire and be replaced with a younger model. Alito is a possibility too. It won't change the balance. It will lock in the current balance for a longer period of time.Which Justice is going to be replaced in the next 4 years that will alter the balance?
Sotomayor gonna keel over? She sure as hell ain’t gonna retire if Trump & GOP are in position to replace her.
what happens if you only a own a few guns, and they are all on that new banned list?I think it's a safe bet you will be keeping your guns regardless. Since that fear mongering narrative was started in the late 1990s, there's never been anything close to a move with legislation to do so. Now, I'm speaking to the idea all guns are going to be taken, which that narrative insinuates much like your post. Hell, Marsha spewed that narrative about Bredesen, who was literally a multi-gun owner and hunter
I figured it would be more of the 2019 proposal, any of the following would get your gun banned. but currently not banned.Which ones are those? They're already banned?