But, on the other hand, he is white and male and hates black and brown people and foreigners, which is what 3/4 of this board really cares about.
I am confused about this. the tweet says here are 50 valid reasons, and then gives you 72 in the text. so are they admitting that 22 of the opinions they gave are invalid?
never could get it to zoom in far enough to read the main body of the text, but in the section titles I read such hard hitters as:
-A group of just personal attacks on Trump:
Liar
horrible human
Laughing Stock
Heartless
Cruel
Loser
Evil
Coward
Moron
Bully
Lazy
-Then some stuff that just seems straight up made up, or stretched beyond reality, and don't make sense. maybe the text gives some context
Pedophile (interested to see this one backed up)
Epstein
-They offer some political points that again I would be really curious to see how they are justified.
GOP
Maga
Hitler and Nazis are two separate sections, I find that to be strange.
Gun Violence (I find this funny since he passed an unconstitutional ban on gun parts)
the founding fathers and the federalist society, maybe the text gives more context
steve bannon
Dr Fauci
-there are some valid critiques on there, but in general I bet there isn't anyone offering anything substantially different:
deficit
Iran
accountability
the constitution
china
Palestine
just seems like liberal woman yelling memery.
