Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

You conveniently left out the crazed liberals part of the post.


Like I said earlier what ever happens to these people is a them problem! He's been fired!
View attachment 659589View attachment 659590


I left it out because it's beside the point. Do you know what the point was? It wasn't about whether or not the guy did anything wrong.

I can't believe you're celebrating this level of cancel culture. It's kind of mind-boggling. We're canceling restaurant workers? What if it were a BLM type account canceling some old Home Depot worker for saying "Chinamen" or something along those lines?

I just can't believe we're to the point where the right-wing mob wants to punch down like this.
 
Why can't you guys call it what it is? Why do you have to lie about it? She's not just reposting. She's injecting her butthurt and literally giving outrage-fueled calls-to-action in her posts. What planet are you guys on?
Well this is why some won't let it die......... what a short memory we have.

Do you remember these?

 
Let me get this right than you also believe they didn't put personnel up on the roof because of slope.... because none of this makes sense. Its getting worse.

If someone would have just said, we F'd up here and there and here..... this and that. Okay maybe, but now they are going to shut it all down.
If this were true, then why were the other snipers allowed on the other buildings? They were sloped as well. It's really smelling rotten. I would think they would be trying to get in front of this story but is looks like they are more interested in covering things up. Not good.
 
If this were true, then why were the other snipers allowed on the other buildings? They were sloped as well. It's really smelling rotten. I would think they would be trying to get in front of this story but is looks like they are more interested in covering things up. Not good.

Well, even if the counter sniper team was up on the non-sloped sloped roof.... would they have bothered to shoot? Is anyone going to make the call to get Orange off stage?

tumblr_o19vhkmIbq1unwasno2_400.gif
 
His father told law enforcement he assumed his son had gone to the shooting range at the The Clairton Sportsmen's Club to practice with his rifle and would be back by 1pm on Saturday, CNN reported.

But as time went on he grew more concerned and phoned local law enforcement.

At around 3pm on Saturday, Crooks was spotted at the rally's security screening area and tried to pass through metal detectors with the rangefinder, which is used by shooters to measure distance.

The device, which looks like a small pair of binoculars, would not have prevented him getting into the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, but did put him on law enforcement's radar.

The Secret Service watched him but lost track of Crooks when he left the secure area.

He is then believed to have collected the rifle he used to shoot Trump, kill a rally attendee and wound others from his car, which also contained a bulletproof vest and two explosive devices.

Then, about 40 minutes before the shooting, Crooks was back on the Secret Service radar.

A photograph showing the sniper appearing to crawl on the ground while scouring the area was circulated to law enforcement as a suspicious sighting at 5:30pm.

Around 6:11pm, Crooks took up a position on a slanted roof and shot at Trump from a distance of around 165 yards, wounding him in the ear and killing retired fire chief Mr Comperatore.

A Secret Service counter-sniper team codenamed 'Hawkeye' also spotted him looking at their position through the rangefinder.

The latest bombshell developments raised more questions about the massive security failures that led to the attempted assassination of the former president.

1721242078660.png
The remote detonator is seen next to Thomas Crooks' cellphone

The gunman was also acting strangely around the metal detectors that attendees were forced to walk through before entering the event grounds. Witnesses said that Crooks was furiously checking his phone and operating a hunting range finder.

He attempted entry around this point but set the detector off and was refused, sources said.

 
The libsoftiktok bish trying to ruin a cook's life
Not just that, but also potentially making things difficult for that entire restaurant and the others who work there, many of whom probably don't even know what their colleague said and/or disagree with it.

She was better before Taylor Lorenz wrote the article revealing her identity. She practices a lot of what she claims to hate now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
Out of curiosity, what rationale do you have that it's her fault? Hers in particular.

I'm not saying people are wrong to demand answers and that it should be thoroughly reviewed to improve practices.

But it sure does seem like the politics of the situation are to blame some high up official just to have that rub off on the administration somehow.

She’s the HBIC the buck stops at her desk
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
I left it out because it's beside the point. Do you know what the point was? It wasn't about whether or not the guy did anything wrong.

I can't believe you're celebrating this level of cancel culture. It's kind of mind-boggling. We're canceling restaurant workers? What if it were a BLM type account canceling some old Home Depot worker for saying "Chinamen" or something along those lines?

I just can't believe we're to the point where the right-wing mob wants to punch down like this.

I agree that is punching down and petty. I hate cancel culture. However, the left wing mob started this cancel culture years ago. They can't be surprised when it;s eventually used against them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Rightists, just like Leftists have a long and proud history of cancel culture. The Dixie Chicks had a great fall even before ubiquitous social media.
Dixie Chicks cancelled themselves. They insulted their own audience. You can't blame the right for the DCs being stupid.
 
You conveniently left out the crazed liberals part of the post.


Like I said earlier what ever happens to these people is a them problem! He's been fired!
View attachment 659589View attachment 659590

Based on the very little information given, it appears the employer acted correctly and in the best interest of the business. As long as the company stays within the law, that is its primary goal, to stay in business. Suspended, HR investigation, action with company policy, resolution - what is in best interest of company.

The employee had every right to say that with no fear of governmental punitive action. The employee did not have the right to stay employed. Freedom of Speech refers to government inhibiting speech, it does not free someone from the legal consequences of that someone’s actions as to employment.

He is free to apply for employment elsewhere, any certifications/licenses etc. should not be affected, he can move to another location, whatever he wants to do or attempt to do. If another employer chooses not to hire him due to his actions on this subject - that is not a protected class. It is a business’s prerogative to make legal decisions in the company’s best interest. That’s the purpose of management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL and 825VOL
It will be glorious watching this incompetent DEI boob taken to the woodshed assuming she doesn’t resign beforehand.
Most likely nothing is going to happen to anyone... not really. Whatever does happen is very low cost, very low risk.... high reward. (They basically have it down pat)
 

VN Store



Back
Top