Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

The problem is... they are saying or implying the opposite now. Its not a lack of resources, see we did nothing wrong. Well, okay, I believe you.... so slope roof? And what does a slope roof have to do with not identifying a guy on that roof and rolling Orange out there?

There are three witnesses to a sniper in the water tower as well.

No offense, I really dont trust those witnesses. There's enough administrative incompetence and negligence here to pursue. Dont chase the batshit crazy stuff....
 
  • Like
Reactions: tntar heel

Saw this story earlier. This crap gets crazier and crazier. They are tracking Iranian death threats against Trump, yet the SS allows a guy with a rifle into a perched position within 130 yards? SMDH. Can anyone think of a single Biden administration department that shows even a borderline level of competency?
 
No offense, I really dont trust those witnesses. There's enough administrative incompetence and negligence here to pursue. Dont chase the batshit crazy stuff....

Those witnesses were giving their account right at the event, I really don't think they are making stuff up. That doesn't mean there isn't an explanation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voltrapnbama
Batshit crazy like the roof was too steep?

Cheatle is covering up that the resources were spread too thin, her admin did not hire/retain enough agents, the overall risk assessment for DJT and RFK was flawed, and site plan were was flawed...

Hit those points. Cheatle put people at risk because of HER failures
 
Cheatle is covering up that the resources were spread too thin, her admin did not hire/retain enough agents, the overall risk assessment for DJT and RFK was flawed, and site plan were was flawed...

Hit those points. Cheatle put people at risk because of HER failures

Yes, no doubt and she's throwing crap against the wall hoping something sticks.
 
Cheatle is covering up that the resources were spread too thin, her admin did not hire/retain enough agents, the overall risk assessment for DJT and RFK was flawed, and site plan were was flawed...

Hit those points. Cheatle put people at risk because of HER failures

The problem is... she doesn't appear to have hit that language, imo.

There really is zero excuse for not getting Orange off stage, zero, that alone makes it appear intentional. All the strange cute stuff like slope, drones, resources, etc.... doesn't explain how 100% avoidable situation happened, and makes it look intentional in nature.
 
Cheatle is covering up that the resources were spread too thin, her admin did not hire/retain enough agents, the overall risk assessment for DJT and RFK was flawed, and site plan were was flawed...

Hit those points. Cheatle put people at risk because of HER failures
My boss: What happened?

Me: I had a terrible plan, executed it poorly, and misappropriated resources and it led to a disaster for us.

My boss: I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors
 
The sniper had eyes on him. He must've seen him train the gun. He should've never been able to shoulder the rifle, let alone fire between 3-9 shots.
There was a photo a few pages back from the vantage point behind Trump as he stood on stage. The shooter was on the roof of a building in the background. The building the snipers were on seemed to be behind trump, and to the right of the photo. There looked like there were some trees between the snipers and the shooter's roof.

Given that we have been told the shooter's building was a staging area for police, including sharpshooters, I wonder if there were any impediments to the agents/officers on overwatch behind trump - if they could clearly see the target on the rooftop to eliminate him as a "good guy."

I also think about the stories of an officer coming up over the roof edge, having the shooter point the rifle at him, falling/retreating, then the shooter shooting quickly. I wonder how that times up with the images of the overwatch snipers on target, then one of the counter snipers pulling up from the scope like, "WTH is going on?", then back down on his weapon and engaging with the shooter quickly.

It seems, without any overlapping timeline videos, that this was a magnificent cluster right before the shooting (leaving all the other questions aside right now): shooter on the roof, counter-snipers unable to ID, Officer coming over the roof ledge causing further confusion to snipers as shooter swings gun around on rooftop, sniper pulls off magnified scope to get a broader view of the scene, shooter shoots, counters engage. All in a matter of seconds.

The most potentially interesting piece of evidence to me would be a video shot from the sniper's scope, if it was set up to have that technology, which I doubt. That would at least help answer questions regarding the propriety of his actions.
 
Hit that Cheatle incompetently,negligently, or willfully put the former POTUS and Americans in harms way because there were not enough agents, the planning was flawed, and the overall risk assessment for DJT and RFK was abysmal.

The batshit crazy stuff about the SS trying to kill Trump on her orders is only going to neutralize the absolute incompetence shown here by her team...
 
Hit that Cheatle incompetently,negligently, or willfully put the former POTUS and Americans in harms way because there were not enough agents, the planning was flawed, and the overall risk assessment for DJT and RFK was abysmal.

The batshit crazy stuff about the SS trying to kill Trump on her orders is only going to neutralize the absolute incompetence shown here by her team...

Nothing is going to happen even if they admitted to it. You know its true.

Oh wow, we got one person fired.

Personally, I have no idea what happened exactly.... but yesterday I was more or less defending SS, now this is all bat **** crazy.

Not much of this makes sense.
 
Nothing is going to happen even if they admitted to it. You know its true.

Oh wow, we got one person fired.

Personally, I have no idea what happened exactly.... but yesterday I was more or less defending SS, now this is all bat **** crazy.

Not much of this makes sense.

My best guess:

You are going to find out this SS team was spread too thin, that they were too inexperienced, and they supplemented part of their inner perimeter with outside resources more than normal.

They delegated high risk areas to small town cops that did not have the comptence for it because the SS didnt have enough boots on the ground.

The communication was messed up because you had too many people in roles over their competence level or in new roles.

The pre event planning was flawed and the resources allocated did not reflect a proper risk assessment. You had an underresourced SS team executing a flawed plan based on a flawed risk analysis and relying on small town cops that are way beyond their competency.

Ultimately, this will get pinned on the locals with this being a huge $$$ grab for the SS...
 
Those witnesses were giving their account right at the event, I really don't think they are making stuff up. That doesn't mean there isn't an explanation.
I thought the original BBC interview was complete BS but that guy was spot on correct with literally everything he said. They want people to think these witnesses are crazy. And a lot of them seen what they saw…
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
Advertisement

Back
Top