I know you understand that ignoring the main point, even after it is expressly identified for you, is intellectually dishonest because I’ve explained that to you many times before and you’ve spent years being butthurt over the fact that you couldn’t get a mature response from me because you had shown yourself to he a fundamentally dishonest person.
So are you too stupid to understand the connection between consistency, sincerity, and credibility, or are you still being dishonest?
In the simplest terms I can fathom:
I didn’t call you out for not calling out others. I called you out for being insincere and questioned wtf you thought you were accomplishing as somebody who has no credibility to call out inflammatory rhetoric. The guy on this thread was just the latest, most immediate, post-shooting example of inconsistency.
A re-read of any thread about January 6 and probably the Paul Pelosi attack would show that you don’t actually care about inflammatory rhetoric and have refused to acknowledge any politically inconvenient events as being direct consequences of inflammatory rhetoric in the past.
Trying to now moralize about rhetoric appears insincere because you’re not consistent. If it’s not sincere and not consistent then it’s not persuasive.
If it’s not persuasive then what are you accomplishing by making these posts crying about Biden? You don’t need to explain yourself to me, hence the “be honest with yourself.” Although it seems even that little honesty is too much to ask of you.