hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 121,150
- Likes
- 178,973
I do think it was a good exchange and presented opposing viewpoints in a coherent fashion for discussion. We never reached consensus but honestly I think that’s a unicorn on thus topic.I just realized, we have geeked out and nerded all over this thread for almost 4 pages.
The usual posters here are waiting for us to stop LARPING in their park before they return to play games and have fun.
Honestly there is no wrong answer here. Now that you’ve read the 16 page document in it’s entirety you can see very little is actually specified.You're forcing me to side with hog. You know what icky that makes me feel?
I can. But I can also see where you have read into it more than it contains. I don't fault your judgement on how you came to your conclusions. I have simply reached different, and therefore, much better conclusions.Honestly there is no wrong answer here. Now that you’ve read the 16 page document in it’s entirety you can see very little is actually specified.
Right now I’m in the lab with my feet kicked up so I can indulge myself some more.
I can. But I can also see where you have read into it more than it contains. I don't fault your judgement on how you came to your conclusions. I have simply reached different, and therefore, much better conclusions.
Men would live in a brier patch if it put them in close proximity to food and sex. And you know he is married to a spicy latina so he must be where she dictates.I fault his judgement, he lives in Texas by choice. Proof positive of faulty judgement.
Lol. Based on what is actually defined I think inference is required to reach any conclusion on what is specified. Again… horrible documentI can. But I can also see where you have read into it more than it contains. I don't fault your judgement on how you came to your conclusions. I have simply reached different, and therefore, much better conclusions.