I see some people making a lot of Jewel Spear comments about being undecided. I just read what she said and to be honest it does not make a lot of sense to me. The team gave her approval to be part of a leadership team. She and others shared their input with the AD. They made a change. If you announced as part of the leadership team you were returning after sharing your input, then why are you suddenly undecided. Sounds like one or two things. She is seeking to get a guarantee on her role as the go-to-player on this team from the new coach. Or she does not think this fits her style of play. Either one is fine because that’s her choice. I just feel they need to let her decide one way or the other then move on or move forward. That doesn’t sound like a decision she is making in the best interest of a team. This is a personal decision.
I think that is what most people in here are saying. If she can adapt from her sub patterns of every two minutes that she has had part of her system everywhere else she has went, then yes, that is great. If she has a player like ZZ and takes her out every two minutes, that isn’t a good thing.My pitch would be that "you can play as many minutes as your conditioning allows". If you are ZZ, yeah, you can play 35 minutes, most aren't.
I don’t mind the system, I’ve played that way on a few AAU teams but I also played most of the game as well, we wasn’t subbing every 2 mins. The subbing patterns is a concern for me, no elite player will sign up for that.I think that is what most people in here are saying. If she can adapt from her sub patterns of every two minutes that she has had part of her system everywhere else she has went, then yes, that is great. If she has a player like ZZ and takes her out every two minutes, that isn’t a good thing.
Yes, I’m all for pressing and turnovers. I thought Kellie’s defensive system was way too passive. I also like the idea of shooting a lot of 3s and lots more possessions. No problems with that. However, she will have a hard time trying to convince elite players who want the ball in their hands to come play a system where you only play a few minutes at a time. The system is great if it is adapted.I don’t mind the system, I’ve played that way on a few AAU teams but I also played most of the game as well, we wasn’t subbing every 2 mins. The subbing patterns is a concern for me, no elite player will sign up for that.
The boosters/donors did not have confidence in Harper. Donors told White that if he made a change they would support NIL for Lady Vols Basketball. White got that commitment before he made the move.I’m starting to believe that y’all don’t fully understand recruiting. And if he’s throwing out all this money then why didn’t he do it for Coach Harper? If what some of y’all have been saying is true then it sounds like he was being quite shady towards Harper. If the NIL money will be better for the new coach then why didn’t he do it for Harper?
Iowa played 6-7 players and played for a title.I think that is what most people in here are saying. If she can adapt from her sub patterns of every two minutes that she has had part of her system everywhere else she has went, then yes, that is great. If she has a player like ZZ and takes her out every two minutes, that isn’t a good thing.
If thus is the case, CKC will win here. If we get elite players, her system will win. I sure hope the donors come through.The boosters/donors did not have confidence in Harper. Donors told White that if he made a change they would support NIL for Lady Vols Basketball. White got that commitment before he made the move.
I’m talking about the nation, like maybe a 4-5 seed in the NCAA tournament, they won’t be picked to win a championship like they did with Reese.I think you stated middle of the pack buts that’s not a roster that will be middle of the pack either. As far as the SEC unless we’re able to bring in a great portal haul then it’s SC then LSU or Texas for top three.
Who is he??D.W.? Doesn't go N.I.L.I’m starting to believe that y’all don’t fully understand recruiting. And if he’s throwing out all this money then why didn’t he do it for Coach Harper? If what some of y’all have been saying is true then it sounds like he was being quite shady towards Harper. If the NIL money will be better for the new coach then why didn’t he do it for Harper?