W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 149,489
- Likes
- 399,136
You calling someone a cult member is beyond hilarious.You have proven yourself a cult member because of your unconditional support and defense of Donald Trump. You also label anyone who is critical of him as being the person who is truly at fault ... rather than addressing the merits of the criticism itself.
I think you and the rest of your cult are the ones in need of help.
Do you have a clue as to what nepotism means? If my father-in-law is driving us somewhere and I observe a BLM riot, did I gain riot experience because of nepotism? Think man!!! Think!!! The experience came from being there and observing it, not because of nepotism.Her limited experience, was not gained by the quality of her own merits. Of course, it was nepotism. You don't make any damn sense.
I thought I saw you at a BLM riot! You are one crazy mofo!!!Do you have a clue as to what nepotism means? If my father-in-law is driving us somewhere and I observe a BLM riot, did I gain riot experience because of nepotism? Think man!!! Think!!! The experience came from being there and observing it, not because of nepotism.
She gained experience because she was related to the man at the center of it. That is not nepotism! It is having a front row seat because of the relationship.
You're off your rocker. Plain English:
Nepotism: the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.
Getting the job with the RNC: yes, you moran, nepotism could be claimed in that case. Gaining experience in politics because a close family member ran for office and one chose to participate is not nepotism. It is because one was there in the front row.
LOL, OK.You have proven yourself a cult member because of your unconditional support and defense of Donald Trump. You also label anyone who is critical of him as being the person who is truly at fault ... rather than addressing the merits of the criticism itself.
I think you and the rest of your cult are the ones in need of help.
You grew up?LOL, OK.
I guess you aren't paying attention because he was not my choice as the R candidate, and I am not "defending" him. I want him to behave differently, this time around.
None of that changes the simple truth that there are two options as next POTUS. Why in God's Earth would I vote for the one that has destroyed the economy, killed our servicemen, continues to waste money on foreign wars that don't involve us, wants to take my Constitutional rights, allows illegal immigrants to flow like the Rio Grande into this country, and whose policies are almost all 180 degrees from my views?
Ok, you're right. Vote for a senile old man who literally represents almost everything I don't want for this country. Maybe I should behave like an adult and tamper-vote in the wrong Primary, next time.You grew up?
So are you saying that the Dems are against those things that they wouldnt support them,?If he was capable of doing any of these things in bold, then why didn't he when his party was in control of both chambers of Congress during his first two years in office? It's a fair question. Republicans will not have control of the House next year. That is close to being a certainty now.
And even tho the GOP had control didnt they fight him tooth and nail an just about everything?He definitely increased border security and made progress on the physical wall.
He fought fervently vs the ACA but was unable to get legislation through congress.
He repealed many of the climate change regulations
He definitely incentivized American industry and energy.
I believe the education platform is newer this go-round.
That is a ridiculous false equivalency.Do you have a clue as to what nepotism means? If my father-in-law is driving us somewhere and I observe a BLM riot, did I gain riot experience because of nepotism? Think man!!! Think!!! The experience came from being there and observing it, not because of nepotism.
She gained experience because she was related to the man at the center of it. That is not nepotism! It is having a front row seat because of the relationship.
You're off your rocker. Plain English:
Nepotism: the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.
Getting the job with the RNC: yes, you moran, nepotism could be claimed in that case. Gaining experience in politics because a close family member ran for office and one chose to participate is not nepotism. It is because one was there in the front row.
It's the brazenness of the act.
You have nepotism on top of a conflict of interest. Trump used his political clout to get his daughter-in-law a position she is completely unqualified for ... and this was done for the self-serving purpose of steering RNC donations towards his personal legal expenses. It is the act of an autocrat. It's highly unethical. Republicans complain about the ethics of the Biden's - when they don't even have their own house in order.
COVID destroyed the economy. Under Biden, there has been clear progress. What servicemen has he killed?LOL, OK.
I guess you aren't paying attention because he was not my choice as the R candidate, and I am not "defending" him. I want him to behave differently, this time around.
None of that changes the simple truth that there are two options as next POTUS. Why in God's Earth would I vote for the one that has destroyed the economy, killed our servicemen, continues to waste money on foreign wars that don't involve us, wants to take my Constitutional rights, allows illegal immigrants to flow like the Rio Grande into this country, and whose policies are almost all 180 degrees from my views?
There are loopholes around that. It's difficult to prove.You should be happy. If she diverts RNC donations to her FILs legal fees that would be a violation of campaign finance laws and fraud so she and others could be prosecuted. Plus if she isn’t qualified that will just help your tribe win elections. What are you bitching about? Don’t you want Trumps to be prosecuted and the Ds to win elections?
@UT_VOLS13 ....This country should feel a collective sense of shame for nominating these two major party candidates for the 2nd straight election cycle. Biden is too old, and he has always embodied the worst traits of a career politician. He is a brutally untalented person, who never even tried to accomplish anything in the private sector. Trump, on the other hand, is a loathsome individual, who appeals to the lowest common denominators of human behavior. He is egotistical to an extreme, and pathologically dishonest. He has no sense of self-awareness about him, and lacks intellectual curiosity.
Well, in a similar way i said to Luther, he is the candidate.It's probably not illegal. I have only referred to it as being unethical. I have already said why it matters. It's highly unethical ... and brazenly so. No person who would do this, has any business being the President of the United States or even being taken seriously as a candidate for that matter.
Nah, let ‘em leave it all on the field.Dang, after reading through the past several pages, you progressive liberal screechers that are so much smarter than everyone else really ought to consider pacing yourselves. You are unhinged in hysteria already, and it's barely even March.
It's going to be a long year, and you might want to save a little energy so you can pack and head out next year, as promised.