2024 Presidential Race

#11,555
#11,555
BowlBrother85 said:
Are you really so naive, as to believe that Putin's "endorsement" reflects a genuine desire to see Biden re-elected? Putin is simply helping the Trump Campaign advance their desired narrative.

The reality is that Trump is completely predictable when it comes to Russia. Whether it concerns the DNC hacking or the SolarWinds breach, Trump will argue against imposing sanctions against Russia and come to their defense.
Click to expand...

😂😂😂😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#11,556
#11,556
BowlBrother85 said:
www.bbc.com

Alabama IVF ruling: What does it mean for fertility patients?

The case stems from a lawsuit brought by three couples whose frozen embryos were lost at a clinic.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

Ultimately, the Alabama ruling will only lead to hospitals in Alabama declining to perform IVF treatment for couples who are unable to conceive. Who wants to assume the risk?

.... and off topic, but the Chief Justice Tom Parker quoted passages of scripture in his opinion. I haven't seen that done in a long time.
Click to expand...
This is a huge win handed to Democrats nationally by the Alabama Supreme Court. Agree, it only applies in Alabama, but its propaganda value is immense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737
#11,557
#11,557
GroverCleveland said:
This is a huge win handed to Democrats nationally by the Alabama Supreme Court. Agree, it only applies in Alabama, but its propaganda value is immense.
Click to expand...

Meh... not really. It didn't change much with regard to Abortion. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization already fired up the pro-Abortion crowd. This ruling has to do with handling and care of embryos at a fertility clinic. If anything, it will ensure stronger protection of embryos from being damaged.

It could be used to perhaps remind people of Dobbs but the actual court case has very little to do with abortion and didn't really change abortion laws.
 
#11,558
#11,558
BowlBrother85 said:
www.bbc.com

Alabama IVF ruling: What does it mean for fertility patients?

The case stems from a lawsuit brought by three couples whose frozen embryos were lost at a clinic.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

Ultimately, the Alabama ruling will only lead to hospitals in Alabama declining to perform IVF treatment for couples who are unable to conceive. Who wants to assume the risk?

.... and off topic, but the Chief Justice Tom Parker quoted passages of scripture in his opinion. I haven't seen that done in a long time.
Click to expand...
I think you are correct here, which will drive IVF candidates to other states and have their embryos stored there. I would like to know what Alabama considers "accidentally destroying" an embryo. Miscarriage after implantation?
 
#11,559
#11,559
BigOrangeMojo said:
Pretty much common knowledge that CPI is a lagging indicator....
Click to expand...
inflation had been under 2 percent before Biden took office. Inflation did not take off until the passage of biden's wastful spending programs along with his attack on oil driving gas prices up.

"Nope. It (inflation) was not there and started after the passage of the unnecessary American Rescue Plan, which was passed solely by Democrats in early 2021," Townhall editor Katie Pavlich tweeted.

"President @JoeBiden says he bears no responsibility for #inflation, despite signing off on massive spending in budget years 2021 and 2022. He is either lying or really dumb abt the causes of inflation," Reason's Nick Gillespie said."
www.foxnews.com

Biden busted for claiming high inflation 'was already there' when he took office: 'Dead wrong and he knows it'

President Joe Biden was slammed on Twitter Friday after he argued that inflation did not go up under his watch. Inflation reached forty-year highs in 2022.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#11,560
#11,560
evillawyer said:
Keep it up goobers. You're really winning the female vote with this stuff.

Click to expand...

I won't say anything about how it hurts female voters,but he's covering himself by saying"you all might disagree, but I'm right " He knows a big chunk of the congregation won't be there next week.
 
#11,561
#11,561
jmacvols1 said:
inflation had been under 2 percent before Biden took office. Inflation did not take off until the passage of biden's wastful spending programs along with his attack on oil driving gas prices up.

"Nope. It (inflation) was not there and started after the passage of the unnecessary American Rescue Plan, which was passed solely by Democrats in early 2021," Townhall editor Katie Pavlich tweeted.

"President @JoeBiden says he bears no responsibility for #inflation, despite signing off on massive spending in budget years 2021 and 2022. He is either lying or really dumb abt the causes of inflation," Reason's Nick Gillespie said."
www.foxnews.com

Biden busted for claiming high inflation 'was already there' when he took office: 'Dead wrong and he knows it'

President Joe Biden was slammed on Twitter Friday after he argued that inflation did not go up under his watch. Inflation reached forty-year highs in 2022.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...

Once again, CPI is a lagging indicator. By the time consumers see inflation on the shelves, it's been in the supply chain for months. Go back and listen to pretty much every retailer from late 2020/very early 2021 on their earnings release.

Here was a few comments from Wal Mart for quarter that overlapped end of Trump term and first couple of weeks of Biden's term.

"We'll navigate the supply chain challenges and inflationary pressures, whether that's in cogs or wages"

" Unprecedented shipping cost"

"Unprecedented cost inflation"

"Unprecedented supply chain stress"

"Managing margins in an inflationary environment"


By the time the retail customer (i.e. CPI) sees inflation, it's been throughout the chain for months.

I will absolutely agree with you that Biden's energy policy and continued wasteful spending turbocharged inflation. But it was there...


 
 
#11,562
#11,562
BigOrangeMojo said:
Once again, CPI is a lagging indicator. By the time consumers see inflation on the shelves, it's been in the supply chain for months. Go back and listen to pretty much every retailer from late 2020/very early 2021 on their earnings release.

Here was a few comments from Wal Mart for quarter that overlapped end of Trump term and first couple of weeks of Biden's term.

"We'll navigate the supply chain challenges and inflationary pressures, whether that's in cogs or wages"

" Unprecedented shipping cost"

"Unprecedented cost inflation"

"Unprecedented supply chain stress"

"Managing margins in an inflationary environment"


By the time the retail customer (i.e. CPI) sees inflation, it's been throughout the chain for months.

I will absolutely agree with you that Biden's energy policy and continued wasteful spending turbocharged inflation. But it was there...


 
Click to expand...
Was it there in 2019, 2018 cuz Trump excess spending should have shown some kinda indicator??
 
#11,563
#11,563
jmacvols1 said:
inflation had been under 2 percent before Biden took office. Inflation did not take off until the passage of biden's wastful spending programs along with his attack on oil driving gas prices up.

"Nope. It (inflation) was not there and started after the passage of the unnecessary American Rescue Plan, which was passed solely by Democrats in early 2021," Townhall editor Katie Pavlich tweeted.

"President @JoeBiden says he bears no responsibility for #inflation, despite signing off on massive spending in budget years 2021 and 2022. He is either lying or really dumb abt the causes of inflation," Reason's Nick Gillespie said."
www.foxnews.com

Biden busted for claiming high inflation 'was already there' when he took office: 'Dead wrong and he knows it'

President Joe Biden was slammed on Twitter Friday after he argued that inflation did not go up under his watch. Inflation reached forty-year highs in 2022.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
Inflationary pressures were already there .... it was just a matter of time.
 
#11,564
#11,564
BigOrangeMojo said:
Once again, CPI is a lagging indicator. By the time consumers see inflation on the shelves, it's been in the supply chain for months. Go back and listen to pretty much every retailer from late 2020/very early 2021 on their earnings release.

Here was a few comments from Wal Mart for quarter that overlapped end of Trump term and first couple of weeks of Biden's term.

"We'll navigate the supply chain challenges and inflationary pressures, whether that's in cogs or wages"

" Unprecedented shipping cost"

"Unprecedented cost inflation"

"Unprecedented supply chain stress"

"Managing margins in an inflationary environment"


By the time the retail customer (i.e. CPI) sees inflation, it's been throughout the chain for months.

I will absolutely agree with you that Biden's energy policy and continued wasteful spending turbocharged inflation. But it was there...


 
Click to expand...
the numbers do not match what you say. Inflation was under 2 percent annually and only increased AFTER Biden's war on oil and wastful spending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#11,565
#11,565
whodeycin85 said:
Was it there in 2019, 2018 cuz Trump excess spending should have shown some kinda indicator??
Click to expand...

It was actually slowly increasing towards end of 2019 (remember Trump got pissed at Powell cutting rates) but it crashed in March 2020 and reversed/climbed from there for the past 3.5 yrs
 
#11,567
#11,567
jmacvols1 said:
the numbers do not match what you say. Inflation was under 2 percent annually and only increased AFTER Biden's war on oil and wastful spending.
Click to expand...

No, you do not understand that CPI inflation lags several months and that the nation's largest retailer was publicly saying it's coming....

When shipping container costs increased by 1500% from China in late 2020....

I agree, it became parabolic when Biden spent more and declared war of energy. It was also an issue when Powell didn't have the balls to raise interest rates in late 2020..
 
#11,569
#11,569
GroverCleveland said:
This is a huge win handed to Democrats nationally by the Alabama Supreme Court. Agree, it only applies in Alabama, but its propaganda value is immense.
Click to expand...
Treating an embryo as an unborn child, while it is still in the culture step of the IVF process, is a new one. Republicans have overreached .... and it will hurt them with women voters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbovol
#11,570
#11,570
BowlBrother85 said:
Treating an embryo as an unborn child, while it is still in the culture step of the IVF process, is a new one. Republicans have overreached .... and it will hurt them with women voters.
Click to expand...

A male christian crazy leads the Aler-bamy Supreme Court. Who would have thought! Alabama being Alabama.....
 
#11,573
#11,573
volbound1700 said:
Meh... not really. It didn't change much with regard to Abortion. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization already fired up the pro-Abortion crowd. This ruling has to do with handling and care of embryos at a fertility clinic. If anything, it will ensure stronger protection of embryos from being damaged.

It could be used to perhaps remind people of Dobbs but the actual court case has very little to do with abortion and didn't really change abortion laws.
Click to expand...
Agree with the legal ramifications and that Alabama is perfectly well within its rights to do this. But thinking this is not a propaganda win for dimwits to be used nationally is naive I believe. Flipped onto a couple of channels this morning of leftist news media and they were harping on it already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement


Back
Top