85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 34,316
- Likes
- 68,200
I engaged directly and you are (hopefully pretending to be) still confused. Saying that pro-Palestinian protests at large quickly devolve into people yelling "gas the Jews" is insane, and "what about the worst thing I could find on the Internet?????" conversations mostly are stupidI apologize for assuming you were capable of honest engagement. Troll on.
I engaged directly and you are (hopefully pretending to be) still confused. Saying that pro-Palestinian protests at large quickly devolve into people yelling "gas the Jews" is insane, and "what about the worst thing I could find on the Internet?????" conversations mostly are stupid
I will say it more deliberately I guess“Pro-Palestinian protests” became “pro-Hamas, calling for terrorist attacks on the U.S. and screaming Death to America” in zero seconds in this thread
No, especially if the below is your basis for saying thatDo you agree the "pro-Palestinian" protests seem to quickly become that in real life too?
Which they are not, other than probably some anecdote that It "happened one time somewhere"When you're chanting "gas the Jews"
Which is not even remotely, a little bit, similar to the bolded aboveor "from the river to the sea"
OK. Hope that helps, it's hard to see those things as simply "pro-Palestinian".
Did he speak about targeting civilians? Like elementary schools?“In all wars there are some civilian victims. We are not responsible for them,” he said in an interview with Saudi Arabia-based television channel Al Arabiya on Friday. - Khaled Meshaal, director of Hamas’s diaspora operations and a chief spokesman for the group (Full article)
Ok, swell. The Ham-*ss talking head is acknowledging that there are bound to be civilian casualties, and they're not responsible for them. By that logic, the Israeli military should not be held responsible for civilian collateral damage either, right?
You have to admit, that the saying can only have 1 meaning though, right?I will say it more deliberately I guess
No, especially if the below is your basis for saying that
Which they are not, other than probably some anecdote that It "happened one time somewhere"
Which is not even remotely, a little bit, similar to the bolded above
OK. Hope that helps
It is wild to me what the people of Gaza continue to support.![]()
Polls Show Majority of Gazans Were Against Breaking Ceasefire; Hamas and Hezbollah Unpopular Among Key Arab Publics
Recent Washington Institute polls have tracked Gazans’ views on Hamas and the ceasefire with Israel, along with a wider regional decline in popularity for Hamas and Hezbollah.www.washingtoninstitute.org
Overall, 57% of Gazans express at least a somewhat positive opinion of Hamas—along with similar percentages of Palestinians in the West Bank (52%) and East Jerusalem (64%)—though Gazans who express this opinion of Hamas are fewer than the number of Gazans who have a positive view of Fatah (64%).
But it is organizations like Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and Lion’s Den that receive the most widespread popular support in Gaza. About three quarters of Gazans express support for both groups, including 40% who see the Lion’s Den in a “very positive” light
I will say it more deliberately I guess
No, especially if the below is your basis for saying that
Which they are not, other than probably some anecdote that It "happened one time somewhere"
Which is not even remotely, a little bit, similar to the bolded above
OK. Hope that helps
Did he speak about targeting civilians? Like elementary schools?
"The main question" is whether people should be kicked out of the country for participating in a pro-Palestinian protest. Unless you are saying that "from the river to the sea" should get someone kicked out of the country, I think you are confused about what the "strawman" isMore strawmen without ever answering the main question. Is chanting to the river to the sea, simply pro-Palestinian or is it is something closer to a call for genocide?