War in Ukraine

Absolutely we should not be spending more than we bring in. It’s great that you agree we shouldn’t be sending money we don’t have to Ukraine.

Because sending $66.2 billion to Ukraine, mostly in the form of already purchased military hardware, is responsible for a $1.375 trillion budget deficit?

1695753961413.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and BeardedVol
its responsible for 66.2 billion of it.

No. That's not correct.

Giving Ukraine old weapons does not result in any cash payment or affect our deficit one iota. In fact, EVERYTHING we've sent them thus far technically has not affected our debt position.

Now, when we give them cash or other cash-equivalent aid, that does count against the deficit... probably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeardedVol
No. That's not correct.

Giving Ukraine old weapons does not result in any cash payment or affect our deficit one iota. In fact, EVERYTHING we've sent them thus far technically has not affected our debt position.
sure its not part of the deficit, but it is part of the debt.

we paid 66.2 billion for that stuff, and we are getting zero in return for it, that is a net loss of.....66.2 billion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
What kind of goals did they set? Again with this nonsense? Putin clearly spelled it out in February 2022.

1. Demilitarization of Ukraine
2. Denazification
3. Protecting the Russian population in Donbas

The Denazification will likely last past 2025.if.. that will likely be a decade or more of Russia going in every rat hole, bunker and hideout until those vermin are defeated and their will to fight is broken.
Good Lord your delusion is only outmatched by your dedication to Russian propaganda.
 
even Putin had to admit that Russia didn't have as much support in Ukraine as they thought. its why their march on Kiev failed. its amazing how you guys get amnesia all the time.

So which was it? Kiev or Crimea? 2 totally different demographics. You understand that, right?
 
Advertisement





Back
Top