So, there is a threat of possible attacks by....

#5
#5
gsvol said:
Building a reason for more gun control.

How many people think the Oklahoma City federal building bombing was the work of right wing extremists??
Click to expand...

If they do, their idiots. McVeigh was an atheist, thus eliminating him from the right wing because he has no affiliation with religion. Remember, according to most you have to believe in God to be considered a right winged extremist.
 
#6
#6
g8terh8ter_eric said:
If they do, their idiots. McVeigh was an atheist, thus eliminating him from the right wing because he has no affiliation with religion. Remember, according to most you have to believe in God to be considered a right winged extremist.
Click to expand...

Terry Nichols made numerous visits and hundreds of phone calls to the Philippines to contact high level muslim terrorists and learned his bomb making skills from them.

There were at least two mid eastern men involved in the operation in Oklahoma City, probably Iraqi intelligence agents.

No less than a former CIA director testified before congress to the veracity of the above statements.

Obama's attorney general was very instrumental in the squashing of the FBI investigation into the matter and the justice department, in which he was second in command was criminally guilty of the suppression of evidence in the case.

Now that same man is heading up this witch hunt!!!!

You don't have to believe in God according to this latest DHS memo, you only have to believe in the US Constitution and it's amendments to be a right wing extremist!!!
 
#7
#7
Not sure I approve of the terms "radicals" or "extremists". Do not think that helps, instead it divides. I would suggest the administration refer to them as "really enthusiastic politically minded people".
 
#8
#8
Any opposition to their irresponsible spending and selling our souls to other country's is labeled extreme.
 
#9
#9
during the Bush administration these lunatics were able to do whatever they wanted to in protest of the president, i mean look at shows like "lil bush" "thats my bush" etc, and lunatic film makers (micheal moore) now when its our turn its like we dont have the right. any obama cronie that says i cant have my opinions or that my POV is bad because im close minded can go eat a fishstick
 
#10
#10
GASOUTHERNVOL said:
during the Bush administration these lunatics were able to do whatever they wanted to in protest of the president, i mean look at shows like "lil bush" "thats my bush" etc, and lunatic film makers (micheal moore) now when its our turn its like we dont have the right. any obama cronie that says i cant have my opinions or that my POV is bad because im close minded can go eat a fishstick
Click to expand...
They want to make a race issue out of it to shut you up.
 
#12
#12
I'm pretty sure the working definition of "extremist" in this context is "anyone that acts in opposition to our goals".
 
#13
#13
Funny thing is, the folks doing this report came out with concerns about both left and right fringe elements. And they were commissioned to investigate by Bush.

So far, the only organized effort towards domestic terrorism that I can really remember is Oklahoma City. There are probably some smaller scale left wing versions of the same thing. I do believe that there are people in our society who get so marginalized that they resort to violence to express themselves. If there is reliable evidence that such a group, left or right, is getting organized, and if it espouses or contemplates violence, I don't see identifying and monitoring them as a First Amendment issue.
 
#14
#14
Someone at homeland security must be reading our politics forum.
 
#18
#18
lawgator1 said:
Funny thing is, the folks doing this report came out with concerns about both left and right fringe elements. And they were commissioned to investigate by Bush.

So far, the only organized effort towards domestic terrorism that I can really remember is Oklahoma City. There are probably some smaller scale left wing versions of the same thing. I do believe that there are people in our society who get so marginalized that they resort to violence to express themselves. If there is reliable evidence that such a group, left or right, is getting organized, and if it espouses or contemplates violence, I don't see identifying and monitoring them as a First Amendment issue.
Click to expand...

What was telling though about your assertions that there were investigations into left wing fringe groups is that when a spokesperson was asked about them he had no information or recollection of any investigation into them being done. In other words he was either briefed about the dangers of rightwing groups so the report could be properly represented to the press, while having no info on left wing groups to present......could it possibly be because there was an agenda there? Namely to discredit the tea party events and lump them with far right radicals? Another possibility as I see it is there was no such investigation into left wing radicals, at least to the scale they did with those on the right. Again, this would be agenda driven. The third and least likely possibility is that they did investigate and found no real threats from left wing radicals, as I said before very unlikely.
 
#19
#19
KB5252 said:
What was telling though about your assertions that there were investigations into left wing fringe groups is that when a spokesperson was asked about them he had no information or recollection of any investigation into them being done. In other words he was either briefed about the dangers of rightwing groups so the report could be properly represented to the press, while having no info on left wing groups to present......could it possibly be because there was an agenda there? Namely to discredit the tea party events and lump them with far right radicals? Another possibility as I see it is there was no such investigation into left wing radicals, at least to the scale they did with those on the right. Again, this would be agenda driven. The third and least likely possibility is that they did investigate and found no real threats from left wing radicals, as I said before very unlikely.
Click to expand...


The problem with your theory about the timing in terms of the tea parties is that it wasn't that the report was released and publicized -- its was the ultra-conservative Washington Times that found out about it and published a big story on it.
 
#20
#20
lawgator1 said:
The problem with your theory about the timing in terms of the tea parties is that it wasn't that the report was released and publicized -- its was the ultra-conservative Washington Times that found out about it and published a big story on it.
Click to expand...

Wow, a foundering newspaper selling papers...

Who would have ever known?

:blink:
 
#21
#21
lawgator1 said:
The problem with your theory about the timing in terms of the tea parties is that it wasn't that the report was released and publicized -- its was the ultra-conservative Washington Times that found out about it and published a big story on it.
Click to expand...
surely you're not so silly as to imply that it isn't newsworthy? This ridiculousness makes all of the grousing about the Patriot Act look downright stupid.
 
#22
#22
BigPapaVol said:
surely you're not so silly as to imply that it isn't newsworthy? This ridiculousness makes all of the grousing about the Patriot Act look downright stupid.
Click to expand...

LG finds it amusing that he can rile the toothless masses with his drivel.

The key is to play along and reaffirm his belief.

:hi:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top