The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#5,427
#5,427
turbovol said:
If not a conviction, then what....the uninformed, addled opinions of MAGA? Ha.....

There's fact and reality, and then there is the conspiracy nonsense that MAGA bathes in .
Click to expand...

Yes. There is fact and reality. And the facts and reality are that people have been wrongly convicted of crimes for thousands of years. So to state a conviction is the “ultimate proof of guilt” is naive to put it lightly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,428
#5,428
turbovol said:
If not a conviction, then what....the uninformed, addled opinions of MAGA? Ha.....

There's fact and reality, and then there is the conspiracy nonsense that MAGA bathes in .
Click to expand...
So then inyo and using your guilt logic...Trump who was accused (impeached) 2x and as not convicted on either charge is not guilty of those impeachments correct,??
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Orangeburst
#5,438
#5,438
turbovol said:
Am I supposed to care that MAGA don't like my posts? Oh, damn--there's that acronym again!
Click to expand...
No it makes you a hack devoid of any actual beliefs just parroting what your tribal leaders tell you. You’re exactly the same as the Trump supporters you complain about.

Let’s face it. Your tribe is the leader in labeling something they can’t debate against it a weak attempt to discredit it. For example “the black face of white supremacy “ for black people who have the audacity to think differently than how their white liberal overlords think they should think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, SpaceCoastVol, Vol since 77 and 1 other person
#5,444
#5,444
Can’t say I’m mad about the people who tried this **** getting prosecuted.

Voting is our first bulwark against tyranny because the up-front investment is low. So, whether or not to punish people who tried to subvert that process and whether to deter future efforts to circumvent elections isn’t a controversial issue, for me. I’m uncomfortable with the idea of prosecuting risk of persecuting a political figure, but not to a degree that I think we should ignore evidence of his personal involvement in those efforts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
#5,445
#5,445
RockyTop85 said:
Can’t say I’m mad about the people who tried this **** getting prosecuted.

Voting is our first bulwark against tyranny because the up-front investment is low. So, whether or not to punish people who tried to subvert that process and whether to deter future efforts to circumvent elections isn’t a controversial issue, for me. I’m uncomfortable with the idea of prosecuting risk of persecuting a political figure, but not to a degree that I think we should ignore evidence of his personal involvement in those efforts.
Click to expand...
Frivolity is a just reason for angst
 
#5,449
#5,449
evillawyer said:
Link to the guardian article
Click to expand...


You following Peter Strzok ...

200w.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, SpaceCoastVol, OrangeBoro and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top