That's racist!

[allvol123]

According to my twitter timeline… this is the most racist thing that happened this weekend. Jimmy Kimmel’s birthday party. People need to get a f’ing life.

What is this? It is supposed to be racist?

 

[Majors]

What is this? It is supposed to be racist?

Hollywood privilege…I’m sure they made a donation to Heart of Los Angeles as a feel good deed. Good to see Jake Tapper mixing it up representing CNN.

 

[RDU VOL#14]

What is this? It is supposed to be racist?

Jimmy Kimmel had a dinner party with his close friends and apparently it wasn’t diverse enough for some.

 

[allvol123]

Jimmy Kimmel had a dinner party with his close friends and apparently it wasn’t diverse enough for some.

Just absurd if anyone is complaining.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Alabama senator Tommy Tuberville refused to define white nationalists as racist: 'Well, that's your opinion,' he told CNN host.

Definition of WHITE NATIONALIST

^^^^ Merriam-Webster ^^^^

WHITE NATIONALIST : noun .... one of a group of militant white people who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.

 

[hog88]

Alabama senator Tommy Tuberville refused to define white nationalists as racist: 'Well, that's your opinion,' he told CNN host.

Definition of WHITE NATIONALIST

^^^^ Merriam-Webster ^^^^

WHITE NATIONALIST : noun .... one of a group of militant white people who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.

Stupid definition.

 

[Orangeburst]

Alabama senator Tommy Tuberville refused to define white nationalists as racist: 'Well, that's your opinion,' he told CNN host.

Definition of WHITE NATIONALIST

^^^^ Merriam-Webster ^^^^

WHITE NATIONALIST : noun .... one of a group of militant white people who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.

Joe Biden worried in 1977 that certain de-segregation policies would cause his children to grow up 'in a racial jungle'

 

[BowlBrother85]

Stupid definition.

LOL .... because someone should respect your definition more than that of Merriam-Webster?

 

[hog88]

LOL .... because someone should respect your definition more than that of Merriam-Webster?

A person can be white and a nationalist and not be prejudiced, believe in white supremacy or segregation . Hence it's a stupid definition.

 

[BowlBrother85]

A person can be white and a nationalist and not be prejudiced, believe in white supremacy or segregation . Hence it's a stupid definition.

Are you seriously arguing with Merriam-Webster over how to define a term? LOL. This is great.

Seriously, who the hell do you think you are, that you get to tell Webster's how to define things?

 

[hog88]

Are you seriously arguing with Merriam-Webster over how to define a term? LOL. This is great.

I mean, seriously, who the hell do you think you are? Good lord.

Yes, they can be and are wrong.

Who do I think I am? I think I'm someone with more common sense than whoever wrote that definition for M-W. If it would be "Nationalist White Supremacist" I'd agree with the definition but since there are millions of exceptions to their definition it's inaccurate.

 

[C-south]

Alabama senator Tommy Tuberville refused to define white nationalists as racist: 'Well, that's your opinion,' he told CNN host.

Definition of WHITE NATIONALIST

^^^^ Merriam-Webster ^^^^

WHITE NATIONALIST : noun .... one of a group of militant white people who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.

Sounds like BLM or alphabets with one word changing it.

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

A person can be white and a nationalist and not be prejudiced, believe in white supremacy or segregation . Hence it's a stupid definition.

“Listen, just because a registered voter in my state believes their race is superior to all others, I’m not going to call that registered voter a racist.”

 

[hog88]

“Listen, just because a registered voter in my state believes their race is superior to all others, I’m not going to call that registered voter a racist.”

Why wouldn't you call that person a racist? Seems dumb not to since they believe their race is superior.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Yes, they can be and are wrong.

Who do I think I am? I think I'm someone with more common sense than whoever wrote that definition for M-W. If it would be "Nationalist White Supremacist" I'd agree with the definition but since there are millions of exceptions to their definition it's inaccurate.

It's very telling about your own state of mind, that you think your understanding of the meaning of a term deserves recognition over that of an established authority of close to 200 years (founded in 1831), such as Merriam-Webster.

 

[hog88]

It's very telling about your own state of mind, that you think your understanding of the meaning of a term deserves recognition over that of an established authority of close to 200 years (founded in 1831), such as Merriam-Webster.

I agree. It is telling (and quite surprising) that my mind is less cluttered and open to true meaning than such a venerable institution as M-W. But I'm also not politically compromised either so there's that.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I agree. It is telling (and quite surprising) that my mind is less cluttered and open to true meaning than such a venerable institution as M-W. But I'm also not politically compromised either so there's that.

LOL. You think you get to override Merriam-Webster, and define the "true meaning" of terms? This is rich.

 

[C-south]

LOL. You think you get to override Merriam-Webster, and define the "true meaning" of terms? This is rich.

It’s sad they’re going to s*** as well. Just use older versions for reference.

 

[BowlBrother85]

But I'm also not politically compromised either so there's that.

A boost in the self-awareness department wouldn't hurt you. You are accusing Merriam-Webster of a political bias .... because they don't define a term to your liking? Even for this forum, this is an especially ridiculous line of thinking.

 

[C-south]

A boost in the self-awareness department wouldn't hurt you. You are accusing Merriam-Webster of a political bias .... because they don't define a term to your liking? Even for this forum, this is an especially ridiculous line of thinking.

You support people who can’t define what a woman is. How does MW define it?

 

[whodeycin85]

You support people who can’t define what a woman is. How does MW define it?

The define women as a adult female....but when you look up female and girl they added gender identity to those definitions...so yes they are politically motivated

 

[UT_VOLS13]

Georgia Democrat defects to GOP after she says Dems 'crucified' and 'abandoned' her

 

[hog88]

LOL. You think you get to override Merriam-Webster, and define the "true meaning" of terms? This is rich.

Yep. When they’re wrong they’re wrong.

 

[hog88]

A boost in the self-awareness department wouldn't hurt you. You are accusing Merriam-Webster of a political bias .... because they don't define a term to your liking? Even for this forum, this is an especially ridiculous line of thinking.

Now if this isn’t the pot calling the kettle black.

 

[volfanhill]

LOL. You think you get to override Merriam-Webster, and define the "true meaning" of terms? This is rich.

I think he thinks he can have an opinion on the definition of something. What's really strange is this hill you want to be on that says Merriam - Webster can't be wrong. Weird.