The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#5,126
#5,126
BreatheUT said:
The nazi's got the media behind them to promote their propaganda before they could enforce their propaganda. The news turned into a state reporting arm instead of independent journalism and evenhandedness. Tell us how both parties are running the playbook? An example will do the trick. I appreciate your feedback.
Click to expand...
Why don't you try answering the question first because all you have done is provided an example of modern day politics in its finest hour. Not even close to an explanation, just simple jargon. News is a bought commodity in today's world and supports either side depending on those who support it and the stories that will keep viewers for advertising dollars.
 
#5,127
#5,127
It's funny to observe how conservatives react when another example of misconduct, corruption or law-breaking involving the gangster or his redneck supporters emerges. Like truffle hounds, they nose around for days or weeks, looking for some loophole or bit of minutiae that could justify his behavior. The country will watch extended videos of a poorly dressed, grimy mob attacking the Capitol, and Maga will jump through hoops trying to defend it--to the point of pretending that the FBI must have organized the attack. Oh, my--the insanity!

We see the same thing now with the documents case. He had classified records that he shouldn't have had, he was asked repeatedly, for months, to return them, and he refused. He lied, he obstructed attempts to retrieve the records, and eventually the government went and retrieved the records, and then later indicted the man for breaking the law. The audiotape of the gangster talking to the female assistant or campaign worker (or whoever she is) about one of the classified documents is a window into the gangster's puerile personality: He's bragging about the secret info he was privy to as president--and boasting about having the document in his possession at Mar-a-Lago. He's acting not like an ex-president but like a 14-year-old year old bragging to a buddy about his stash of dirty magazines or somesuch. He's 77 but has always been the teenage tyrant/bully who lives down the street, who is the source of a constant stream neighborhood problems and who reacts to criticism and law-enforcement reaction to his behavior by viciously lying and trying to blame everyone else. He properly belongs in prison with other chronic lawbreakers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#5,128
#5,128
turbovol said:
We see the same thing now with the documents case. He had classified records that he shouldn't have had, he was asked repeatedly, for months, to return them, and he refused. He lied, he obstructed attempts to retrieve the records, and eventually the government went and retrieved the records, and then later indicted the man for breaking the law. The audiotape of the gangster talking to the female assistant or campaign worker (or whoever she is) about one of the classified documents is a window into the gangster's puerile personality:
Click to expand...
... and this was after making the responsible handling of classified material a point of emphasis during his 2016 Presidential Campaign. At heart, Trump is a deeply insincere person.


 
#5,130
#5,130
turbovol said:
It's funny to observe how conservatives react when another example of misconduct, corruption or law-breaking involving the gangster or his redneck supporters emerges. Like truffle hounds, they nose around for days or weeks, looking for some loophole or bit of minutiae that could justify his behavior. The country will watch extended videos of a poorly dressed, grimy mob attacking the Capitol, and Maga will jump through hoops trying to defend it--to the point of pretending that the FBI must have organized the attack. Oh, my--the insanity!

We see the same thing now with the documents case. He had classified records that he shouldn't have had, he was asked repeatedly, for months, to return them, and he refused. He lied, he obstructed attempts to retrieve the records, and eventually the government went and retrieved the records, and then later indicted the man for breaking the law. The audiotape of the gangster talking to the female assistant or campaign worker (or whoever she is) about one of the classified documents is a window into the gangster's puerile personality: He's bragging about the secret info he was privy to as president--and boasting about having the document in his possession at Mar-a-Lago. He's acting not like an ex-president but like a 14-year-old year old bragging to a buddy about his stash of dirty magazines or somesuch. He's 77 but has always been the teenage tyrant/bully who lives down the street, who is the source of a constant stream neighborhood problems and who reacts to criticism and law-enforcement reaction to his behavior by viciously lying and trying to blame everyone else. He properly belongs in prison with other chronic lawbreakers.
Click to expand...
So he’s a politician in your view.
 
#5,133
#5,133
Majors said:
Based on your last few days of telling people they are wrong…don’t really need to meet. That takes and ego and pride without acknowledging your own wrongs.
Click to expand...
When I'm telling someone that they are wrong, I'm usually doing so with links to sources with verifiable information. That only requires having the facts on my side.
 
#5,135
#5,135
Majors said:
You pick and choose facts and which sources to link. Pride and ego. It’s cool, you’re like Trump.
Click to expand...
Right.

I pick the relevant facts, under discussion, and I link sources which confirm the points I'm making. I don't draw false equivalencies, and try to change the subject matter, in other words.
 
#5,138
#5,138
BreatheUT said:
All the biased links you source, you should stick to your day job.
Click to expand...
Majors said:
Ego and pride with your choice of slanted progressive/left leaning articles of choice. Picking and choosing facts.
Click to expand...
This just proves that you don't actually click on any of the links that I provide. Especially as it pertains to this thread, I have most frequently posted links to government sites, rather than media outlets. These government sites have no commentary. They simply define terms .... such as The Presidential Records Act of 1978 (below).

Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978

There is no bias to this. It simply states facts, which is what I try to do. Whenever I am posting links to media outlets, it will usually be in the form of a YouTube video ... or to one of the sites listed below :

Forbes
Fortune
The Wall Street Journal
Politico
The Hill
Business Insider
Newsweek
Time
Reuters
AP News
ABC News
CBS News
NBC News
The New York Times
USA Today
PBS
The New Yorker
BBC
The Independent

^^^ I will put the journalistic credibility of those sources up against what the Trump supporters / Republicans / Conservatives typically link here any time ... it's usually something like "Red Elephant", "Just the News", "The Gateway Pundit", "Breitbart", "The Federalist", "Leading Report", or a tweet from the likes of Paul Sperry.
 
Last edited:
#5,139
#5,139
BowlBrother85 said:
This just proves that you don't actually click on any of the links that I provide. Especially as it pertains to this thread, I have most frequently posted links to government sites, rather than media outlets. These government sites have no commentary. They simply define terms .... such as The Presidential Records Act of 1978 (below).

Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978

There is no bias to this. It simply states facts, which is what I try to do. Whenever I am posting links to media outlets, it will usually be in the form of a YouTube video ... or to one of the sites listed below :

Forbes
Fortune
The Wall Street Journal
Politico
The Hill
Business Insider
Newsweek
Time
ABC News
CBS News
NBC News
The New York Times
USA Today
PBS

^^^ I will put the journalistic credibility of those sources up against what the Trump supporters / Republicans / Conservatives typically link here any time ... it's usually something like "Red Elephant", "Just the News", "The Gateway Pundit", "Leading Report", or a tweet from Paul Sperry.
Click to expand...
I’ve stated as much long ago when you posted left leaning/progressives only. Acknowledged by your list of reference.

Remove any publication that ran Steele Dossier as truth or consistent coverage as truth and we can discuss integrity journalistic credibility.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and InVOLuntary
#5,140
#5,140
Majors said:
I’ve stated as much long ago when you posted left leaning/progressives only.

Remove any publication that ran Steele Dossier and we can discuss integrity journalistic credibility.
Click to expand...
I have never only posted left/leaning progressive content. I have mostly posted among the outlets which I listed above.

In an above post, you were critical of my linked sources in this thread ... which you are now admitting that you did not even bother to click on; much less take the time to read. You were making disingenuous claims formed by way of broad-based assumptions, rather than reality.
 
#5,141
#5,141
BowlBrother85 said:
I have never only posted left/leaning progressive content. I have mostly posted among the outlets which I listed above.

In an above post, you were critical of my linked sources in this thread ... which you are now admitting that you did not even bother to click on; much less take the time to read. You were making disingenuous claims formed by way of broad-based assumptions, rather than reality.
Click to expand...
Admitted that I stopped reading long ago your left leaning articles of choice from your “we got him now” days. Like I said, ego and pride is where you’re similar to Trump with a touch of narcissistic in how you use “I” often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and whodeycin85
#5,142
#5,142
Majors said:
Admitted that I stopped reading long ago your left leaning articles of choice from your “we got him now” days. Like I said, ego and pride is where you’re similar to Trump with a touch of narcissistic in how you use “I” often.
Click to expand...
You are not qualified to accurately assess the integrity of my sources. You have just admitted that you are in ignorance of them. You are being judgmental, and acting as false witness.
 
#5,143
#5,143
Majors said:
I’ve stated as much long ago when you posted left leaning/progressives only. Acknowledged by your list of reference.

Remove any publication that ran Steele Dossier as truth or consistent coverage as truth and we can discuss integrity journalistic credibility.
Click to expand...

Does this mean we can ignore any source you cite that said the 2020 election was stolen or rigged? I hope so because you would never be able to post another link again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#5,144
#5,144
BowlBrother85 said:
You are not qualified to accurately assess the integrity of my sources. You have just admitted that you are in ignorance of them. You are being judgmental, and acting as false witness.
Click to expand...
sure I am. I stated, take out any news publication that ran the Steele Dossier as fact and then we can discuss integrity. Which was why you choose those media outlets of reference.
 
#5,145
#5,145
TN Ribs said:
Does this mean we can ignore any source you cite that said the 2020 election was stolen or rigged? I hope so because you would never be able to post another link again.
Click to expand...
by all means please do so, good news is you won’t find it. I saved you the time. I’m more of a believe what you see not what you’re told kind of American.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,146
#5,146
Majors said:
sure I am. I stated, take out any news publication that ran the Steele Dossier as fact and then we can discuss integrity. Which was why you choose those media outlets of reference.
Click to expand...
Obviously, the government site wasn't reporting on anything having to do with the Steele Dossier. As a matter of fact, it doesn't report anything. You are a joke.
 
#5,147
#5,147
BowlBrother85 said:
Obviously, the government site wasn't reporting on anything having to do with the Steele Dossier. As a matter of fact, it doesn't report anything. You are a joke.
Click to expand...
So of the 10+ publications you stated you can’t find one that didn't retract the Steele Dossier? Believe the joke is on you but you knew that.
 
#5,149
#5,149
Majors said:
So of the 10+ publications you stated you can’t find one that didn't retract the Steele Dossier? Believe the joke is on you but you knew that.
Click to expand...
You are a joke. You don't click on links. You pass blanket judgment on major, well-established news sources and then look like the horse's a$$ that you are.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top