W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 143,959
- Likes
- 384,073
Because it’s taking money from those who work and pay taxes to those who made a decision to sign up for large amounts of debt. It’s not on me to pay off someone else’s debt. If someone doesn’t want to pay the loans off then don’t get them in the first damn place.You still did not say why student loan forgiveness is a bad thing
You still did not say why student loan forgiveness is a bad thing
No free lunches. Individuals that sign loan papers.....whether it's for a car, home, business, or college.....are responsible for the cost of that loan. There is zero logical reason that taxpayers should be responsible for anyone's individual debt. That's not the way it works.
Are you talking PP loans or we discussing debt forgiveness…you went full what about side bar Trump. Just need to know the rules of where you tap out. Believe we found it but just checking.What about the PP loans tRump passed ? Whole lot more money involved. Of course those loans that required no repayment was designed for the wealthy, .not young people wanting to be scientists or Doctors.
What about the PP loans tRump passed ? Whole lot more money involved. Of course those loans that required no repayment was designed for the wealthy, .not young people wanting to be scientists or Doctors.
You mean like PPP loans. MTG made out pretty goodBecause it’s taking money from those who work and pay taxes to those who made a decision to sign up for large amounts of debt. It’s not on me to pay off someone else’s debt. If someone doesn’t want to pay the loans off then don’t get them in the first damn place.
And due to the pandemic, both houses of congress passed that crappy legislation and it was signed by the President. If student loan forgiveness had passed through those same channels, conservatives would be moaning that they shouldn’t pay someone else’s debt, but they wouldn’t be moaning that it was unconstitutional. And then the SC wouldn’t have gotten involved.T
The difference I see is helping the haves or the have not. Giving to the haves cost a ton more.
also highly inflationary to dump ANOTHER trillion dollars into the already out of control inflationary economy that this Biden Buffoon admin fueled with their partisan new green dealBecause it’s taking money from those who work and pay taxes to those who made a decision to sign up for large amounts of debt. It’s not on me to pay off someone else’s debt. If someone doesn’t want to pay the loans off then don’t get them in the first damn place.
California should make the wealthy pay more. 50% of the tax revenue from the 1% isn’t even close to their fair share.
California’s personal income tax collections are its largest revenue source and about half comes from the top 1% of earners. That leaves the budget especially susceptible to financial shocks impacting this small subset of taxpayers.
The Court struck it down because the Executive branch doesn’t have the power to unilaterally act.So you don't like student loan forgiveness, please tell me why, if you have a reason other than it was a democrat trying to pass it.
So that's why you don't like it?The Court struck it down because the Executive branch doesn’t have the power to unilaterally act.
Biden can absolutely sign a debt relief package for student loan borrowers - but it has to come from the Legislative branch.
Just like the PPP package did.
That’s the law. That’s how this works.